The interaction between modality and negation in Turkish

References

Aksu Koç, Ayhan. 1988. The acquisition of aspect and modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554353Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1985. The Mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3). 373–415.Search in Google Scholar

Baturay Meral, Semra. 2022. Kiplik yaklaşımları üzerine genel bir bakış [A general discussion on approaches to modality]. Turkish Studies - Language and Literature 17(4). 1159–1179. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.63709.Search in Google Scholar

Breitbarth, Anne. 2011. Modality and negation in the history of Low German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30(2). 131–167. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2011.007.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Jonny. 2003. A Minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113. 967–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(02)00146-8.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2001. A note on mood, modality, T and aspect affixes in Turkish. In Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.), The verb in Turkish, 47–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.44.03cinSearch in Google Scholar

Corcu, Demet. 2003. A linguistic analysis of necessity as a part of the modal system in Turkish. MA Thesis. Mersin: Mersin University.Search in Google Scholar

Corcu, Demet. 2005. Zorunluluk kipliği belirtisi: –mAlI’nın anlamsal iç yapısı [Necessity modal: the internal structure of -mAlI]. Dilbilim Araştırmaları [Linguistic Investigations] 16. 33–45.Search in Google Scholar

Corcu Gül, Demet. 2010. Tanıtsallığın durum anlambilimsel sunumu: Türkçede tanıt türleri [The semantic presentation of evidentiality: Evidential typology in Turkish]. Ankara: Ankara University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Cormack, Annabel & Neil Smith. 2002. Modals and negation in English. In Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Modality and its interaction with the verbal system, 133–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.47.08corSearch in Google Scholar

de Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The interaction of modality and negation: A typological study. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Erguvanlı Taylan, Eser. 1986. Some aspects of negation in Turkish. In Ayhan Aksu Koç & Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (eds.), Modern studies in Turkish linguistics: Proceeding of the 2nd international conference on Turkish linguistics, 159–179. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Erguvanlı Taylan, Eser. 1996. The parameter of aspect in Turkish. In Ahmet Konrot (ed.), Modern studies in Turkish linguistics: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Turkish linguistics, 153–168. Eskişehir: Anadolu University.Search in Google Scholar

Erguvanlı Taylan, Eser. 2000. Semi-grammaticalized modality in Turkish. In Aslı Göksel & Celia Kerslake (eds.), Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages, 133–143. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Erguvanlı Taylan, Eser. 2001. On the relation between temporal/aspectual adverbs and the verb form in Turkish. In Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.), The verb in Turkish, 97–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.44.05taySearch in Google Scholar

Erguvanlı Taylan, Eser. 2018. Türkçede dilbilgisel kiplikte olasılık ve gereklilik [Possibility and necessity in grammatical modality in Turkish]. Mersin Üniversitesi Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi [Mersin University language and literature journal] 15(2). 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Erguvanlı Taylan, Eser & A. Sumru Özsoy. 1993. Türkçede bazı kiplik biçimlerinin öğretimi üzerine [On the education of some modal markers in Turkish]. In Kamile İmer & N. Engin Uzun (eds.), 7. dilbilim kurultayı bildirileri [Proceedings of 7th linguistics conference], 1–13. Ankara: Ankara University Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Erk Emeksiz, Zeynep. 2008a. Türkçede kiplik anlamının belirsizliği ve anlamsal roller [Modal indeterminacy and sematic roles in Turkish]. Dil Dergisi [Language journal] 141. 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000098.Search in Google Scholar

Erk Emeksiz, Zeynep. 2008b. Deontic modality in Turkish: Pragmatic and semantic constraints. In Ryosuke Shibagaki & Reiko Vermeulen (eds.), MIT working Papers in linguistics 58. Boston: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, Naomi & Sabine Iatridou. 2020. Modals and negation. In Viviane Déprez & M. Teresa Espinal (eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation, 285–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.16Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203340769Search in Google Scholar

Girigoraş, Sözen Özkan. 2020. Word Order and information Structure in Turkish. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Görgülü, Emrah. 2018. Negative polarity, scope of negation and negative phrases in Turkish. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14(4). 136–149. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/945/426 (accessed 12 June 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Gül, Demet. 2012. Semantic operators and the modal meanings of the suffix –Ar. Dilbilim Araştırmaları [Linguistic investigations] 23. 25–40.Search in Google Scholar

Gürer, Aslı. 2015. Semantic, prosodic, and syntactic marking of information structural units in Turkish. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Güven, Mine. 2001. Türkçede -Abil eki ve kiplik belirteçleri üzerine [On the suffix -Abil and modal adverbs in Turkish]. In Ömer Demircan & Aybars Erözden (eds.), 15. Dilbilim kurultayı bildirileri [Proceedings of the 15th linguistics conference], 79–87. Istanbul: Yıldız Technical University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hojatollah Taleghani, Azita. 2006. The interaction of modality, aspect and negation in Persian. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Homer, Vincent. 2015. Neg-raising and positive polarity: The view from modals. Semantics and Pragmatics 8. 1–88. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.8.4.Search in Google Scholar

Iatridou, Sabine & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2009. On the scopal interaction of negation and deontic modals. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.), Pre-proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2009. Amsterdam: ILLC. http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000978 (accessed 22 June 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Iatridou, Sabine & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2013. Negation, polarity and deontic modals. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 529–568. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00138.Search in Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2009. Modals in Turkic. In Björn Hansen & Ferdinand de Haan (eds.), Modals in the languages of Europe, 487–510. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219210.3.487Search in Google Scholar

Kayabaşı, Demet & Murat Özgen. 2018. A phase-based account of NPI-licensing in Turkish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 54. 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2018-0003.Search in Google Scholar

Kelepir, Meltem. 2001. Topics in Turkish syntax: Clausal structure and scope. Boston: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kerimoğlu, Caner. 2010. On the epistemic modality markers in Turkey Turkish: Uncertainty. Turkish Studies 5(4). 434–478.10.7827/TurkishStudies.1836Search in Google Scholar

Kerimoğlu, Caner & Cansu Aksu. 2015. {-DIr} biçimbiriminin sözlü söylemdeki kiplik alanları ve kullanımları [Modality domains and usages of {-Dır} morpheme in Turkish spoken discourse]. Dil Araştırmaları [Language researches] 9(17). 73–94. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1531460 (accessed 20 June 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Kerslake, Celia. 1990. The semantics of possibility in Turkish. In Bengisu Rona (ed.), Current issues in Turkish linguistics, 85–104. Ankara: Hitit Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kocaman, Ahmet. 1988. Modality in the Turkish discourse. In Sabri Koç (ed.), Studies on Turkish linguistics, 463–468. Ankara: METU Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kocaman, Ahmet. 1990. The necessitive mood in Turkish. In Bengisu Rona (ed.), Current issues in Turkish linguistics, 104–111. Ankara: Hitit Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Hans J. Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics, 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110126969.7.639Search in Google Scholar

Kuram, Kadri. 2015. The Organization of functional Heads and tense/aspect/mood Interpretation in Turkish. Newcastle: Newcastle University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Hui-Chi. 2014. The modal system in Hainan Min. Language and Linguistics 15(6). 825–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X14544622.Search in Google Scholar

Linebarger, Marcia Christine. 1980. The grammar of negative polarity. Boston: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

McKenzie, Andrew. 2006. Fixing the scope of negation in Turkish. Ms: University of Massachusetts. https://people.umass.edu/partee/Gen_Neg/_docs/fixingscope.pdf (accessed 10 July 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Meral, Hasan Mesut. 2020. Discourse negation via the ne … –sI structures in Turkish. In Deniz Zeyrek & Umut Özge (eds.), Discourse meaning: The view from Turkish, 23–56. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110686654-002Search in Google Scholar

Moscati, Vincenzo. 2006. The scope of negation. Siena: Università di Siena dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Oikonomou, Despina. 2016. Imperatives are existential modals: Deriving the strong reading as an implicature. In Mary Moroney, Carol-Rose Little, Jacob Collard & Dan Burgdorf (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and linguistic theory conference (SALT), Vol. 26, 1043–1062. Washington: Linguistic Society of America.10.3765/salt.v26i0.3949Search in Google Scholar

Ouhalla, Jamal. 1990. Sentential negation, relativised minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review 7. 183–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1990.7.2.183.Search in Google Scholar

Özgen, Murat. 2021. Stage-level/individual-level predicates and –DIr in Turkish. In A. Selmin Söylemez & Alper Kumcu (eds.), Synergy II: Linguistics: Contemporary studies on Turkish linguistics, 101–132. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Ozil, Şeyda. 1994. Temel tümcelerde ve ortaçlı yapılarda kip anlatımı [Modality in main and relative clauses]. Dilbilim Araştırmaları [Linguistic Investigations] 5. 112–127.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167178Search in Google Scholar

Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585474199Search in Google Scholar

Picallo, M. 1990. Modal verbs in Catalan. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 8(2). 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00208525.Search in Google Scholar

Portner, Paul. 2004. The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Kazuha Watanabe & Robert B. Young (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 14, 235–252. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.10.3765/salt.v14i0.2907Search in Google Scholar

Puskás, Genoveva. 2018. To wish or not to wish: Modality and (metalinguistic) negation. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 125. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.412.Search in Google Scholar

Ruhi, Şükriye, Deniz Zeyrek & Necdet Osam. 1996. Türkçe’de kiplik belirteçleri ve çekim ekleri ilişkisi üzerine bazı gözlemler [Some observations on Turkish modal adverbs and their relations to inflectional suffixes]. IX. Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri [Proceedings of the 9th linguistics conference], 307–315. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal University Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sansa Tura, Sabahat. 1981. “Yes, He Hasn’t” and a few other not’s in Turkish. Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 7. 317–327. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v7i0.2098.Search in Google Scholar

Sansa Tura, Sabahat. 1986. -DIr in modern Turkish. In Ayhan Aksu Koç & Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (eds.), Modern studies in Turkish linguistics: Proceeding of the 2nd international conference on Turkish linguistics, 145–158. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Savaşır, İskender. 1986. Habits and abilities in Turkish. In Dan Slobin & Karl Zimmer (eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics, 137–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.8.08savSearch in Google Scholar

Sebzecioğlu, Turgay. 2004. Türkçede kip kategorisi ve -Yor biçimbiriminin kipsel değeri [Mood category in Turkish and -Yor as a modal morpheme]. Dil Dergisi [Language journal] 124. 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000013.Search in Google Scholar

Sezer, Engin. 2001. Finite inflection in Turkish. In Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.), The verb in Turkish, 1–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.44.02sezSearch in Google Scholar

Thomas, Rose. 2012. The interaction of modality and negation in Finnish. Journal of Linguistics 48(3). 653–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000035.Search in Google Scholar

Tosun, Gülşat. 1999. Split infl hypothesis in Turkish. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Uzun, Nadir Engin. 1998. Türkçede görünüş/kip/zaman üçlüsü [Tense aspect modality in Turkish]. Dil Dergisi [Language journal] 68. 5–22.Search in Google Scholar

Uzun, Nadir Engin. 2000. Anaçizgileriyle evrensel dilbilgisi ve Türkçe [Universal grammar and Turkish]. Istanbul: Multilingual.Search in Google Scholar

Uzun, Leyla & Zeynep Erk Emeksiz. 2002. Türkçede –Ar biçimbiriminin sözdizimsel ve anlambilimsel yapısı üzerine [On the semantic and syntactic structure of -Ar in Turkish]. In Güray König, Nalan Büyükkantarcıoğlu & Firdevs Karahan (eds.), 16. dilbilim kurultayı bildirileri [Proceedings of the 16th linguistics conference], 129–145. Ankara: Hacettepe University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2001. On the typology of negative modals. In Jack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Victor Sánchez-Valencia & Ton van der Wouden (eds.). Perspectives on negation and polarity items, 23–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.40.03auwSearch in Google Scholar

van Schaaik, Gerjan. 2001. The Bosphorus papers: Studies in Turkish grammar, 1996-1999. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Search in Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai. 2006. Modality and language. In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy, 2nd edn. Detroit: MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai & Sabine Iatridou. 2007. Anatomy of a modal construction. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3). 445–483. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.445.Search in Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai & Sabine Iatridou. 2017. A modest proposal for the meaning of imperatives. In Ana Arregui, María Luisa Rivero & Andrés Salanova (eds.), Modality across syntactic categories, 288–319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Yavaş, Feryal. 1980. The Turkish future marker. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 5(1). 139–149. https://doi.org/10.17161/KWPL.1808.540.Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Amsterdam: LOT Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Zidani-Eroğlu, Leyla. 1997. Indefinite noun phrases in Turkish. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison dissertation.Search in Google Scholar