Labeling by type
-
Alain Rouveret
Abstract
The primary goal of this article is to take advantage of some recent theoretical innovations in syntactic theorizing to propose a novel characterization of some of the basic word-order types isolated by typological research. In the minimalist framework, a necessary condition for a derivation to converge is that the structure it generates should be appropriately labeled. This requirement in particular holds for the major syntactic structures displayed by the various linguistic types. It will be argued that labeling theory, combined with phase theory and the variable syntax of inflectional and discourse features, offers contrasting characterizations of these structures and, as such, provides a window on how exactly SVO, V1 and V2 grammatical systems differ: they differ precisely in the strategy that each type selects in order for neutral declarative root clauses to satisfy the labeling requirement. It will also be shown that the topic and focus structures involving phrasal movement to the periphery, although different parametric choices are made by the various grammatical systems considered here, basically conform to the same requirement.
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, verb-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 491–539. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006090432389.10.1023/A:1006090432389Search in Google Scholar
Ambar, Maria Manuela. 1992. Para uma sintaxe da inversão sujeito-verbo em Português. Lisboa: Edições Colibri.Search in Google Scholar
Awbery, Gwen. 2004. Clause-initial particles in spoken Welsh. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 8. 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Baker, Mark & James McCloskey. 2007. On the relationship of typology to theoretical syntax. Linguistic Typology 11. 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty.2007.023.Search in Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1983. Osservazioni sulla sintassi dei testi di Lio Mazor. In Christian Angelet & Alii (eds.), Langue, dialecte, littérature. Etudes romanes à la mémoire de H. Plomteux, 187–197. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1983–1984. Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 4. 3–19.Search in Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Andrew Carnie. 1996. A minimalist approach to some problems of Irish word order. In Robert Borsley & Ian Roberts (eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages: A comparative perspective, 223–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586279.008Search in Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1998. Two heads are not always better than one. Syntax 1. 37–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00003.Search in Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert, Maggie Tallerman & David Willis. 2007. The syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486227Search in Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase. On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 27–89. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00148.Search in Google Scholar
Branigan, Philip. 1996. Verb-second and the A-bar syntax of subjects. Studia Linguistica 50. 50–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1996.tb00343.x.Search in Google Scholar
Branigan, Philip. 2020. Multiple feature inheritance and the phase structure of the left periphery. In Rebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe & Theresa Biberauer (eds.), Rethinking verb second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198844303.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Branigan, Philip. 2023. The grammar of multiple head movement. A comparative study. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197677032.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Branigan, Philip & Alain Rouveret. 2023. Labeling and head-movement in the periphery: The case of Old Irish verbal complexes. Unpublished manuscript. Memorial University of Newfoundland & Université Paris-Cité.Search in Google Scholar
Bury, Dirk. 2002. A reinterpretation of the loss of verb-second in Welsh. In David Lightfoot (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change, 215–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250691.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Bury, Dirk. 2005. Preverbal particles in verb-initial languages. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Sheila Dooley (eds.), Verb first. On the syntax of verb initial languages, 135–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.73.11burSearch in Google Scholar
Bury, Dirk. 2010. Verb-second, particles, and flexible verb-initial orders. Lingua 120. 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.006.Search in Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 33–63. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1999. The origins of complex languages. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238225.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection. Extensions. In Elisa di Domenico, Cornelia Haman & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.223.01choSearch in Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & James McCloskey. 1987. Government, barriers, and small clauses in Modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 173–238.Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917.Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. Studies in Linguistics, CISCL Working Papers 2. 42–58.Search in Google Scholar
Costa. 2004. Subject positions and interfaces: The case of European Portuguese. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110197396Search in Google Scholar
Costa, João & Inès Duarte. 2002. Preverbal subjects in null subject languages are not necessarily dislocated. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1. 159–175. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.40.Search in Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Werner Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania, 47–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.3.03besSearch in Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. Feature inheritance and EPP in the C-T system. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Society for Chomskyan Studies, held at Sogang University (Seoul, South Korea), on 21 August 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1994. The syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886597Search in Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1980. Word order in Generative Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 1. 33–54.Search in Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2006. On the architecture of topic and focus. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus, 33–58. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110922011.33Search in Google Scholar
Favereau, Francis. 1997. Grammaire du breton contemporain. Morlaix: Skol Vreizh.Search in Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect. From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195091922.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Giurgea, Ion. 2010. Subject positions in null-subject Romance languages. Unpublished manuscript. University of Konstanz.Search in Google Scholar
Giurgea, Ion. 2017. Preverbal subjects and topic marking in Romanian. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LXII. 279–322.Search in Google Scholar
Giurgea, Ion & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2009. Postverbal subjects in Romance null-subject languages. Information-structural conditions and variation. Handout of a talk given at Going Romance, Nice, December 3–5, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of grammar, 73–113. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1990. Some remarks on agreement and incorporation. Studies in Generative Grammar 1. 117–144.Search in Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 1994. Layers of predication. The non-lexical syntax of clauses. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become an expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 445–483. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554406.Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax, theory and analysis, an international handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Bob Morris. 1993. Ascriptive and equative sentences in children’s Welsh. In Aberystwyth education papers. Aberystwyth, Dyfed, Wales: Department of Education, University of Wales.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Bob Morris. 1994. Possessive sentences in children’s Welsh. In Aberystwyth education papers. Aberystwyth, Dyfed, Wales: Department of Education, University of Wales.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Bob Morris. 1999. The Welsh answering system. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110800593Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Bob Morris. 2011. The complementizer system in informal Welsh. Unpublished manuscript. University of Aberystwyth.Search in Google Scholar
Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2005. La syntaxe comparée du breton: Département de linguistique, Université de Nantes Doctoral thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2020. Left-edge filling trigger; V2 as obligatory exponence at the sentence level and typological implications. In Rebecca Wood & Sam Wolfe (eds.), Rethinking verb second. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf. 2010. Verb movement in Germanic and Celtic languages. Lingua. 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.006.Search in Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85. 211–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-w.Search in Google Scholar
Krivochen, Diego. 2023. EPP: Can’t live with it, can’t raise without it. Unpublished paper. University of Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Krivochen, Diego & Luis García Fernández. 2019. On the position of subjects in Spanish periphrases. Subjecthood left and right. Borealis 8. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4687.Search in Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2004. The local resolution of VP-fronting chains. Handout of a talk given at GLOW 27, Thessaloniki, April 21, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Louis. 1908. Grammaire bretonne du dialecte de Tréguier. Saint-Brieuc: Prud’homme. Reprinted in 1986, Ar Skol Vrezhoneg, Emgleo Breiz, Brest.Search in Google Scholar
Le Roux, Pierre. 1957. Le verbe breton (morphologie, syntaxe). Rennes: Plihon.Search in Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1991. Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85. 259–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90023-x.Search in Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1996a. Subjects and subject positions in Irish. In Robert Borsley & Ian Roberts (eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages, 241–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586279.009Search in Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1996b. On the scope of verb movement in Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14. 47–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133403.Search in Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 2001. The morphosyntax of wh-extraction in Irish. Journal of Linguistics 37. 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226701008775.Search in Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic antisymmetry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nash, Lea & Alain Rouveret. 1997. Proxy categories in phrase structure theory. In Kiyomi Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 27, 287–304. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, GLSA. Also in Alain Rouveret. 2018. Aspects of grammatical architecture, 52–71. Oxford and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315112497-3Search in Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Esthela Treviño. 1999. Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter. A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107. 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(98)00020-5.Search in Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid. 2008. On C-to-T feature transfer: The nature of agreement and anti-agreement in Berber. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Susann Fischer & Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson (eds.), Agreement restrictions, 159–180. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110207835.159Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Samir Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture. Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 262–294. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. The left-periphery of V2-rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. In Sief Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 214–242. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27. 53–93. https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82606.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Speculations on verb second. In Joan Mascaró & Marina Nespor (eds.), Grammar in progress, 375–386. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110867848.375Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2005. On some properties of subjects and topics. In Laura Brugé, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds.), Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 204–223. Venezia: Ca’ Foscari.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2016. Labeling, maximality and the head-phrase distinction. The Linguistic Review 33. 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0016.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2004. The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2 and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, 297–328. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2005. Principles and parameters in a VSO language: A case study in Welsh. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168211.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 1994. Syntaxe du gallois. Principes généraux et typologie. Paris: CNRS Editions.Search in Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 1996. Bod in the present tense and in other tenses. In Robert Borsley & Ian Roberts (eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages, 125–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Also in Rouveret 2018, 72–115.10.1017/CBO9780511586279.005Search in Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 2017. VSO word order in the Celtic languages. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn. Oxford-New York: Wiley & Blackwell.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom092Search in Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 2023. Nonfinite inquiries. Materials for a comparative study of nonfinite predicative domains. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110769289Search in Google Scholar
Stephens, Janig. 1982. Word-order in Breton. London: SOAS, University of London Doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1989. Raising in Irish and the projection principle. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7. 317–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00208100.Search in Google Scholar
Tallerman, Maggie. 1996. Fronting constructions in Welsh. In Robert Borsley & Ian Roberts (eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages, 97–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586279.004Search in Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa de Mena. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Trépos, Pierre. 1957. Grammaire bretonne. Reprinted in 1994. Brest: Brud Nevez.Search in Google Scholar
Willis, David. 1998. Syntactic change in Welsh: A study of the loss of verb second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198237594.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2014. A route map of the Welsh left periphery. Welsh Syntax Workshop, Leiden, September 19, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. 2005. Verb second in Medieval Romance. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan Wouter. 1996. Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-5880-0_2Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
