Home The morphosyntax of Ezafe in Southern Zazaki
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The morphosyntax of Ezafe in Southern Zazaki

  • Songül Gündoğdu , Arsalan Kahnemuyipour EMAIL logo and Sable Peters
Published/Copyright: July 19, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The present study describes and analyzes the morphosyntactic expression of the Southern Zazaki Ezafe – a linking element in the nominal domain common among Iranian languages. This morpheme is used to link modifiers (i.e. adjectives and possessors) to their head nouns as follows: n-ez1 mod1-ez2 mod2-ez3 mod3. Southern Zazaki, like other languages of the Kurdish region (and unlike, e.g. Persian) reflects phi-features (and case) of the head noun on each Ezafe morpheme in a noun phrase. This paper is focussed around two morphosyntactic puzzles that arise in Southern Zazaki. First, while the Ezafe marker in general reflects the case of the entire DP, the presence of a possessor produces invariant oblique case, regardless of the case value assigned to the DP externally (Paul, Ludwig. 2009. Zazaki. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 545–586. Routledge; Todd, Terry Lynn. 2002. A grammar of Dimili. Also known as Zaza. Stockholm: Iremet Forlag; Toosarvandani, Maziar & Coppe van Urk. 2014. The syntax of nominal concord: What Ezafe in Zazaki shows us. Proceedings of NELS 43(2). 209–220 i.a.). Second, Southern Zazaki uniquely employs a separate series of “D-form” Ezafe morphemes in certain syntactic contexts (Keskin, Mesut. 2010. Zazaca üzerine notlar (Notes on Zazaki). In Şükrü Aslan (ed.), Herkesin Bildiugi Sır: Dersim. Iletisim, 221–244; Paul, Ludwig. 2009. Zazaki. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 545–586. Routledge; Todd, Terry Lynn. 2002. A grammar of Dimili. Also known as Zaza. Stockholm: Iremet Forlag; Werner, Brigitte. 2018. Forms and meanings of the Ezafe in Zazaki. In Saloumeh Gholami (ed.), Endangered Iranian languages. Reichert Verlag i.a.). This study aims to provide a cohesive analysis of Ezafe in Southern Zazaki both with respect to its general phi- and case-sensitive realizations, as well as the distribution of D-forms.


Corresponding author: Arsalan Kahnemuyipour, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada, E-mail:
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC grant #435-2018-0527). Much of the work on this paper was completed when the first author held the Elahé Omidyar Mir-Djalali Postdoctoral Fellowship in Iranian Linguistics at the University of Toronto, generously funded by Roshan Cultural Heritage Institute and the SSHRC grant. We would like to thank the members of the “The Syntax of Nominal Linkers” project and the audience of CLA 2019, 2020 and ICIL 2021 for their valuable feedback on earlier versions of this work. We are truly grateful to Sultan Gümüşkaşık and another anonymous linguistic consultant for generously sharing their knowledge of Zazaki. We also sincerely thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and suggestions. All errors are ours.

Funding source: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Award Identifier / Grant number: 435-2018-0527

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2018-0527).

References

Abels, Klaus & Ad Neeleman. 2012. Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax 15. 25–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00163.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ariyaee, Koorosh. 2023. Nominal linkers in Persian. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 45(1). https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v45i1.41683.Search in Google Scholar

Atlamaz, Ümit. 2016. Merging modifiers of an NP before its arguments. In Proceedings of the 33rd west coast conference on formal linguistics, 47–56. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Babby, Leonard. 1987. Case, prequantifiers, and discontinuous agreement in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5(1). 91–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00161869.Search in Google Scholar

Baier, Nico. 2015. Adjective agreement in noon: Evidence for a split theory of noun-modifier concord. In Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyı ldız (eds.), Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 67–80. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.10.3765/exabs.v0i0.3013Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 2008a. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 2008b. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619830Search in Google Scholar

Barker, Chris. 1998. Partitives, double genitives and anti-uniqueness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 679–717. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005917421076.10.1023/A:1005917421076Search in Google Scholar

Bejar, Susana & Diane Massam. 1999. Multiple case checking. Syntax 2(2). 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00015.Search in Google Scholar

Bjorkman, Bronwyn & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2019. Checking up on (φ-)agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50(3). 527–569. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00319.Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Johnathan & Heidi Harley. 2017. Suppletion is local: Evidence from Hiaki. The structure of words at the interfaces, 68, 141–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198778264.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulàlia. 2013. Agreement in two steps (at least). In Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Brattico, Pauli. 2008. Kayne’s model of Case and Finnish nominal phrases. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31. 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0332586508001911.Search in Google Scholar

Brattico, Pauli. 2010. The two-part models and one-part models of nominal case: Evidence from case distribution. Journal of Linguistics 45. 47–81.10.1017/S0022226709990193Search in Google Scholar

Brattico, Pauli. 2011. Case assignment, case concord, and the quantificational case construction. Lingua 121. 1042–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2001. Grammatically conditioned allomorphy, paradigmatic structure, and the ancestry constraint. Transactions of the Philological Society 99. 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.00081.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2000. Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 319–355. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554370.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against φ-incompleteness. Syntax 4(3). 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00042.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2011. Hyperactivity and hyperagreement in Bantu. Lingua 121(5). 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2016. Delayed valuation: A reanalysis of “upwards” complementizer agreement and the mechanics of case. Syntax 19(1). 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12116.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP. In Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), Paths towards universal grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2002. The functional structure of DP and IP – the cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195148794.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Christopher. 2004. The agreement parameter. In Anne Breitbarth & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Triggers, 115–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197433.115Search in Google Scholar

Danon, Gabi. 2011. Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14(4). 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00154.x.Search in Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olaf. 1993. The internal structure of noun phrases in the Scandinavian languages. Lund, Sweden: Lund University PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion and copulas. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2007. Linearization and local dislocation: Derivational mechanics and interactions. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4). 303–336.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Ghaniabadi, Saeed. 2010. The empty noun construction in Persian. Winnipeg MB: University of Manitoba PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ghomeshi, Jila. 1997. Non-projecting nouns and the Ezafe construction in Persian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15. 729–788. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005886709040.10.1023/A:1005886709040Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 2008. Agreement and concord in nominal expressions. In Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds.), The Bantu-Romance connection, 201–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.131.12giuSearch in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London; New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203340769Search in Google Scholar

Gündoğdu, Songül & Amine Bulan. 2023. Ezafe in Zazaki. Toronto Workinng Papers in Linguistics 45(1). https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v45i1.41679.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alex Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halpert, Claire. 2015. Argument licensing and agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256470.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2013. Feature matching and case/number dissociation in Hiaki. Revista Linguistica 9. 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

Jahani, Carina & Agnes Korn. 2009. Balochi. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 634–692. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Jambrovic, Samuel & Arsalan Kahnemuyipour. 2023. Number, definiteness and compounding in Central Kurdish. Third North American conference in Iranian linguistics. Los Angeles: UCLA.Search in Google Scholar

Julien, Marit. 2003. Double definiteness in Scandinavian. Nordlyd 31(1). 230–244. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.27.Search in Google Scholar

Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.87Search in Google Scholar

Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2014. Revisiting the Persian Ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis. Lingua 150. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.012.Search in Google Scholar

Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan & Andrew Peters. 2019. Separating concord and agree: The case of Zazaki Ezafe. In Proceedings of the CLA annual meeting.Search in Google Scholar

Karim, Shuan. 2021. The synchrony and diachrony of New Iranian nominal morphosyntax. Columbus: The Ohio State University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Karim, Shuan. 2023. Ezafe and the article. In Simin Karimi, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri & Jian Gang Ngui (eds.), Advances in Iranian linguistics II, 130–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.361Search in Google Scholar

Karimi, Simin. 2008. Raising and control in Persian. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Don Stilo (eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Karimi, Yadgar. 2007. Kurdish Ezafe construction: Implications for DP structure. Lingua 117. 2159–2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

Keskin, Mesut. 2010. Zazaca üzerine notlar (Notes on Zazaki). In Şükrü Aslan (ed.), Herkesin Bildiugi Sır: Dersim, 221–244. Istanbul, Türkiye: İletişim.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, Ruther. 2009. Definite markers, phi-features, and agreement: Amorphosyntactic investigation of the Amharic DP. Santa Cruz: University of California PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2016. DP-internal semantic agreement: A configurational analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(3). 975–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9319-3.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard & Vida Samiian. 2020. The Ezafe construction revisited. In Richard Larson, Sedigheh Moradi & Vida Samiian (eds.), Advances in Iranian linguistics, 173–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.351.10larSearch in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard & Hiroko Yamakido. 2006. Zazaki “Double Ezafe” as double case-marking. Paper presented at the LSA Meeting.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard & Hiroko Yamakido. 2008. Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax semantics and discourse, 43–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199211616.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2013. Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 95–115. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2008. A case study of predication. In Franc Marušič & Rok Žaucer (eds.), Studies in formal Slavic linguistics: Contributions from formal description of Slavic languages 6.5, 213–239. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Mark. 2014. A theory of nominal concord. Santa Cruz: University of California PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Mark. 2017a. Description and analyses of nominal concord (Pt I). Language and Linguistics Compass 11(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12266.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Mark. 2017b. Description and analyses of nominal concord (Pt II). Language and Linguistics Compass 11(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12267.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Mark. 2018. Unmarked case in Estonian nominals. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36. 523–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9377-9.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, Ludwig. 1998. Zazaki: Grammatik und Versuch einer Dialektologie. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, Ludwig. 2009. Zazaki. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 545–586. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wend K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar

Peters, Sable Andrew, Zaniar Naghshbandi & Arwin Rasouli. 2023. The Ezafe in Hawrami. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 45(1). https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v45i1.41680.Search in Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 1995. (Re-)introducting Suffixaufnahme. In Frans Plank (ed.), Double case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, 3–110. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195087758.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria. 2016. Agreement in Archi from a minimalist perspective. In Oliver Bond, Greville Corbett, Marina Chumakina & Dunstan Brown (eds.), Archi: Complexities of agreement in a cross-theoretical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747291.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Norvin. 2013. Lardil “Case Stacking” and the timing of case assignment. Syntax 61(1). 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00169.x.Search in Google Scholar

Rolle, Nicholas. 2023. Inward and outward allomorph selection. In Peter Ackema, Sabrina Bendjaballah, Eulàlia Bonet & Antonio Fábregas (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to morphology. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Limited.10.1002/9781119693604.morphcom039Search in Google Scholar

Samiian, Vida. 1983. Origins of phrasal categories in Persian. Los Angeles: UCLA PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Samiian, Vida. 1994. The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar morphosyntax. In Mehdi Marashi (ed.), Persian studies in North America. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks.Search in Google Scholar

Samvelian, Pollet. 2007. A (Phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. Journal of Linguistics 43(3). 605–645. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226707004781.Search in Google Scholar

Samvelian, Pollet. 2008. The Ezafe as a head-marking inflectional suffix: Evidence from Persian and Kurmanji Kurdish. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Donald Stilo (eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics, 339–362. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. The form of semitic noun phrases. Lingua 114(12). 1465–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.019.Search in Google Scholar

Shlonsky, Ur. 2010. The cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6). 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00202.x.Search in Google Scholar

Todd, Terry Lynn. 2002. A grammar of Dimili. Also known as Zaza. Stockholm: Iremet Forlag.Search in Google Scholar

Toosarvandani, Maziar & Coppe van Urk. 2014. The syntax of nominal concord: What Ezafe in Zazaki shows us. Proceedings of NELS 43(2). 209–220.Search in Google Scholar

Weisser, Philipp. 2019. Telling allomorphy from agreement. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.803.Search in Google Scholar

Werner, Brigitte. 2018. Forms and meanings of the Ezafe in Zazaki. In Saloumeh Gholami (ed.), Endangered Iranian languages. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2012. There is only one way to agree. Linguistic Review 29(2). 491–539. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2012-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-07-19
Published in Print: 2024-09-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2024-2013/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button