Chinese topic constructions are derived by movement: evidence from acceptability judgment experiments

References

Almeida, Diogo. 2014. Subliminal wh-islands in Brazilian Portuguese and the consequences for syntactic theory. Revista da ABRALIN 13(2). 55–91. https://doi.org/10.5380/rabl.v13i2.39611.Search in Google Scholar

Aoun, Joseph, Lina Choueiri & Norbert Hornstein. 2001. Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372504.Search in Google Scholar

Bassong, Paul Roger. 2021. Mismatching nominals and the small clause hypothesis. Journal of Linguistics 57. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222672000050x.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. A tale of two minimalisms: Reflections on the plausibility of crash-proof syntax, and its free-merge alternative. In Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.3.06boeSearch in Google Scholar

Bondevik, Ingrid, Dave Kush & Terje Lohndal. 2021. Variation in adjunct islands: The case of Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44. 223–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0332586520000207.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2016. On the timing of labeling: Deducing comp-trace effects, the subject condition the adjunct condition, and tucking in from labeling. The Linguistic Review 33. 17–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2007. A few lessons from typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty.2007.024.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Tatiana Nikitina. 2009. The gradience of the dative alternation. In Linda Uyechi & Lian-Hee Wee (eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, 161–184. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 27–55. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Zhong, Yuhang Xu & Zhiguo Xie. 2020. Assessing introspective linguistic judgments quantitatively: The case of the syntax of Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29. 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-020-09210-y.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz & Ken Hale (eds.), A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics (Special issue). 229–261. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288.Search in Google Scholar

Engdahl, Elisabet. 1982. Restrictions on unbounded dependencies in Swedish. In Elisabet Engdahl & Eva Ejerhed (eds.), Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages, 151–174. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl.2007.020.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Fernanda. 2005. Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science. The Linguistic Review 22. 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.365.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward & Evelina Fedorenko. 2013. The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(1–2). 88–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Chung-hye. 2021. Resumptive pronouns in English. In Grant Goodall (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of experimental syntax, 211–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108569620.009Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Jianhua & Haihua Pan. 2009. Decomposing the aboutness condition for Chinese topic constructions. The Linguistic Review 26. 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2009.014.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logic relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531–574.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 2000. Between syntax and semantics. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Nick. 2019. Variation and learnability in constraints on A-bar movement. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Cheng-Teh James & Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1996. Recent generative studies on Chinese syntax. In Cheng-Teh James Huang & Yen-hui Audrey Li (eds.), New horizons of Chinese linguistics, 49–95. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_3Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Cheng-Teh James, Yen-hui Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Ray Rui-heng & Jen Ting. 2006. Are there dangling topics in Mandarin Chinese? Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 32(1). 119–146.Search in Google Scholar

Keshev, Maayan & Aya Meltzer-Asscher. 2017. Active dependency formation in islands: How grammatical resumption affects sentence processing. Language 93. 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0036.Search in Google Scholar

Keshev, Maayan & Aya Meltzer-Asscher. 2019. A processing-based account of subliminal wh-island effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37. 621–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9416-1.Search in Google Scholar

Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 573–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407588.Search in Google Scholar

Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2018. Investigating variation in island effects: A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36. 743–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z.Search in Google Scholar

Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse. 2019. On the island sensitivity of topicalization in topicalization in Norwegian: An experimental investigation. Language 95(3). 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0237.Search in Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yen-hui Audrey & Wei Wei. 2019. Determining structures without morphological clues: Chinese adverbial phrases with apparent clausal complements. Paper presented at 12th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics, University of Macau, 9–10, July.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14. 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00145.x.Search in Google Scholar

Linzen, Tal & Yohei Oseki. 2018. The reliability of acceptability judgments across languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.528.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Jiayi, Cynthia Thompson & Masaya Yoshida. 2020. Chinese Wh-in-situ and islands: A formal judgment study. Linguistic Inquiry 51. 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00343.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2005. Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. Linguistic Review 22. 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429.Search in Google Scholar

McDaniel, Dana & Wayne Cowart. 1999. Experimental evidence for a minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition 70. B15–B24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00006-2.Search in Google Scholar

Narita, Hiroki & Naoki Fukui. 2022. Symmetrizing syntax: Merge, minimality, and equilibria. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315671901Search in Google Scholar

Ott, Dennis. 2010. Grammaticality, interfaces, and UG. In Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.3.05ottSearch in Google Scholar

Ott, Dennis. 2015. Symmetric merge and local instability: Evidence from split topics. Syntax 18. 157–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12027.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Victor Junnan. 2016. Resumptivity in Mandarin Chinese: A minimalist account. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110492385Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Haihua & Jianhua Hu. 2008. A semantic-pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1966–1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Pañeda, Claudia, Sol Lago, Elena Vares, João Veríssimo & Claudia Felser. 2020. Island effects in Spanish comprehension. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1058.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, Colin. 2010. Should we impeach armchair linguists? Japanese/Korean Linguistics 17. 49–64.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7197.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Shi, Dingxu. 1992. The nature of topic comment constructions and topic chains. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76. 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0070.Search in Google Scholar

Sichel, Ivy. 2014. Resumptive pronouns and competition. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 655–693. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00169.Search in Google Scholar

Sichel, Ivy. 2018. Anatomy of a counterexample: Extraction from relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 49. 335–378. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00275.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon. 2007. A program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida. 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s core syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48. 609–652. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226712000011.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida. 2017. Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.236.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Ivano Caponigro, Ciro Greco & Carlo Cecchetto. 2016. Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34. 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Shin Fukuda, Hajime Ono & Robert Kluender. 2011. Reverse island effects and the backward search for a licensor in multiple wh-questions. Syntax 14. 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00153.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Carson T. Schütze & Diogo Almeida. 2013. A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 134. 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon, Matt Wagers & Colin Phillips. 2012. A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 88. 82–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0004.Search in Google Scholar

Stepanov, Arthur. 2007. The end of CED: Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax 10. 80–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00094.x.Search in Google Scholar

Stepanov, Arthur, Manca Mušič & Penka Stateva. 2018. Two (non-) islands in Slovenian: A study in experimental syntax. Linguistics 56(3). 435–476. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Tingchi. 1977. Studies in transformational grammar of Chinese, 1. Taipei: Student Books Company Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Samuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, Jake, Ivy Sichel & Matthew Wagers. 2022. Extraction from English RCs and cross-linguistic similarities in the environments that facilitate extraction. Languages 7. 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020117.Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas & Jennifer Arnold. 2005. Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua 115. 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong. 1986. Free empty category. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 75–93.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong. 2006. Topicalization in Asian languages. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 5, 137–174. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch73Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong & Donald Terence Langendoen. 1985. Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/413419.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong & Danqing Liu. 2007. Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [Topic: Structure and function]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina Ning. 2002. Island effects and episodic eventualities in Chinese topicalization. In Daniel Hole, Paul Law & Niina Zhang (eds.), Linguistics by heart: In honor of Horst-Dieter Gasde, 164–176. Berlin: ZAS-Berlin.Search in Google Scholar