Abstract
Contrary to the conventional three-way distinction of questions: polar questions, disjunctive questions, and wh-questions, we argue for a more revealing two-way distinction of polar versus constituent questions, the latter with two subtypes: disjunctive and wh-questions. Following Bhatt, Rajesh & Veneeta Dayal. 2020. Polar question particles: Hindi-Urdu kya. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38. 1115–1144 proposal that polar questions denote singleton sets of propositions and the standard view that disjunctive and wh-questions denote sets with multiple propositions, we further characterize this dichotomy pragmatically as confirmation-seeking (CS) and information-seeking (IS), i.e., polar questions seek confirmation of the proposition put forth, while constituent questions seek information specifically targeted by the interrogative constituent. This dichotomy is formally detected in Mandarin Chinese via the question particle ma versus ne, dichotomy of fragment questions, adverb nandao ‘don’t tell me’ versus daodi ‘after all’, respective (in)ability to serve as indirect questions, and an intervention effect on constituent questions. We then discuss the typological implications of this two-way distinction and demonstrate that the Changsha dialect of Xiang, another Sinitic language, has no CS polar questions as the alleged polar questions are all disjunctive questions. This fact suggests that, while there are two major types of questions cross-linguistically, CS polar questions are not universal.
Funding source: Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology
Award Identifier / Grant number: 108-2410-H-029-062-MY3
Award Identifier / Grant number: 109-2811-H-004-522
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the constructive comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the paper. However, we are solely responsible for any remaining errors. He is also thankful to the following scholars for their discussions and suggestions: Giorgio Arcodia, Bianca Basciao, Yupin Chen, Liching Chiu, Guglielmo Cinque, Pei-Yi Hsiao, Hung-Hisn Hsu, Haiping Long, Kun-Han Lin, Anna Morbiato, Hongquan Rao, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, Aurelijus Vijūnas, Jiun-Shiung Wu, and Niina Zhang.
-
Research funding: O.-S. Her received the grants awarded by Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST): 108-2410-H-029-062-MY3 and 109-2811-H-004-522.
References
Allen, Cynthia. 1980. Whether in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 11(4). 789–793.Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Veneeta Dayal. 2020. Polar question particles: Hindi-Urdu kya. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38. 1115–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09464-0.Search in Google Scholar
Biezma, María & Kyle Rawlins. 2012. Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 35. 361–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9123-z.Search in Google Scholar
Bodomo, Adams. 1997. The structure of Dagaare. Palo Alto, CA: CSLI, Stanford University.Search in Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. Yes-no questions are not alternative questions. In Henry Hiż (ed.), Questions, 87–105. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_3Search in Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, Thomas. 2004. Only six kingdoms of life. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271(1545). 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2705.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Robert. 1984. Chinese question forms and their meanings. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 12(1). 86–145.Search in Google Scholar
Chiang, Min-Hua. 2009. Review of A Synchronic and Diachronic Study of the Grammar of the Chinese Xiang Dialects. By Yunji Wu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. Language and Linguistics 10(1). 197–204.Search in Google Scholar
Chung, Raung-fu. 2000. The structure of Hakka interrogative sentences. Hanxue Yanjiu [Chinese studies] 18. 147–174.Search in Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of functional grammar, vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Polar questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/116 (accessed 29 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612312Search in Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Marianne Villermet & Joshua Birchall. 2016. Answers to polarity questions in South American languages. Paper presented at the AMAZÒNICAS VI. Colombia: Leticia.Search in Google Scholar
Gasde, Horst-Dieter. 2004. Yes/no questions and A-not-A questions in Chinese revisited. Linguistics 42(2). 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.010.Search in Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2009. Renewal in the left periphery: Economy and the complementizer layer. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(2). 131–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.2009.01216.x.Search in Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye & Maribel Romero. 2004. The syntax of Whether/Q…or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 527–564. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:nala.0000027674.87552.71.10.1023/B:NALA.0000027674.87552.71Search in Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Hui-Chin Tsai. 2015. On silent elements: A case study of grand and its silent entourage. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33. 575–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9266-4.Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2016. The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701859.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hölzl, Andreas. 2018. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hsiao, Pei-Yi & One-Soon Her. 2021a. Taxonomy of questions in Taiwan Southern Min. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 47(2). 253–299. https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00029.her.Search in Google Scholar
Hsiao, Pei-Yi & One-Soon Her. 2021b. On fragment questions in Mandarin: A questions under discussion approach. Unpublished manuscript, Tunghai University.Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2001. Form and meaning: Negation and question in Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, Yen-ju. 2013. On negation and interrogatives in Hakka. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Hsueh-Ying. 2017. Zaitan Taiwan Keyu de yiwenju [Revisiting Questions in Taiwan Hakka]. Unpublished manuscript https://nccu.academia.edu/HsuehYingHu (accessed 10 June 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & Masao Ochi. 2010. Syntax of the hell: Two types of dependencies. In C.-T. James Huang (ed.), Between syntax and semantics, 207–224. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203873526Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166935Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1994. The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30(2). 411–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700016704.Search in Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2008. The manifestation of emotion: On the Mandarin Chinese nandao-interrogation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 36(2). 211–234.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Bob Morris. 1999. Welsh answering system. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800593Search in Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00351935.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2006. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation. In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 289–299. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter Reprinted in Richard S. Kayne. 2010. Comparisons and contrasts, 73–81. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2012. A note on grand and its silent entourage. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(2). 71–85.Search in Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.005Search in Google Scholar
Kotek, Hadas. 2014. Composing questions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lai, Wenying. 2015. Hakka grammar of Taiwan: An introduction. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lau, Seng-hian. 2010a. Syntax of Kam questions in Taiwanese. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Lau, Seng-hian. 2010b. Excising tags—distinguishing between interrogative SFPs and tag questions in Taiwanese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 8(1). 1–28.Search in Google Scholar
Law, Paul. 2006. Adverbs in A-not-A questions in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15. 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-005-4916-5.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Boya. 2006. Chinese final particles and the syntax of periphery. Leiden: Leiden University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Charles. & Sandra. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Search in Google Scholar
Lo, Seo-Gim. 1984. Hakka grammar. Taipei: Student Book.Search in Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1998. Two empires or three? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95(17). 9720–9723. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.17.9720.Search in Google Scholar
Moser, Elena Vera. 2018. Answers to polarity questions: A typological study. Department of Linguistics. Independent Project for the Degree of Magister 15 HEC. Stockholm University. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8ea4/e9832280b0355edcceb3522b2bf30a8dcd29.pdf (accessed 22 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2021. Sentence-final particles in Chinese. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Published online on 28 June 2021.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.882Search in Google Scholar
Pope, Emily Norwood. 1976. Questions and answers in English. Mouton: The Hague.Search in Google Scholar
Qi, Huyang. 2002. Yuqici yu Yuqi Xitong [Modal Particles and the Mood System]. Hefei, Anhui: Anhui Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Anhui Education Publisher].Search in Google Scholar
Ren, Ying. 2017. Yuqici ne de gongneng ji laiyuan zaiyi [Revisiting the function and the origin of the modal particle ne]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 5. 70–80.Search in Google Scholar
Ringe, Don & Ann Taylor. 2014. The development of old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Michael A., Dennis P. Gordon, Thomas M. Orrell, Nicolas Bailly, Thierry Bourgoin, Richard C. Brusca, Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Michael D. Guiry, Paul M. Kirk & Erik V. Thuesen. 2015. A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS One 10(4). e0119248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248.Search in Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold & Arnold Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 155–196. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2001. Interrogative constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook, 1010–1028. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1017/CBO9781139028240.013Search in Google Scholar
Tang, Ting-Chi. 1981. Guoyu yiwenju yanju [A study on Mandarin questions]. Shida xuebao [Journal of National Taiwan Normal University] 26. 219–277.Search in Google Scholar
Tang, Ting-Chi. 1984. Guoyu yiwenju yanju xulun [A further study on Mandarin questions]. Shida xuebao [Journal of National Taiwan Normal University] 29. 381–437.Search in Google Scholar
Tolskaya, Maria & Inna Tolskaya. 2008. Question particles or what? Open alternative questions in Manchu-Tungusic languages. In Edward J. Vajda (ed.), Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian languages, 97–109. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.300.10tolSearch in Google Scholar
Woese, Carl, Otto Kandler & Mark Wheelis. 1990. Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87(12). 4576–4579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Guo. 2005. The discourse function of the Chinese particle ne in statements. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 40(1). 47–82.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Guo. 2009. A unified account of the discourse function of the Chinese particle “ne”. Macrolinguistics 3. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.26478/ja2009.3.3.1.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Yunji. 2005. A synchronic and diachronic study of the grammar of the Chinese Xiang dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110927481Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Jiun-hsiung & One-Soon Her. 2019. On the dichotomy of questions in Mandarin: A formal semantic account. Unpublished manuscript. National Chung Cheng University and National Chengchi University.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, Bebei. 2012. Nandao questions as a special kind of rhetorical question. In Anca Chereches (ed.), Semantic and linguistic theory (SALT) 22, 488–507. Ithaca: Cornell Linguistics Club.10.3765/salt.v22i0.2643Search in Google Scholar
Xu, Bebei. 2017. Question bias and biased question words in Mandarin, German and Bangla. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 2013. Are A-not-A questions alternative questions or wh-questions? In Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond, 305–319. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Search in Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong. 2012. The structure and function of the Chinese copular construction. Stanford: Stanford University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- No case tampering once transfer domain is formed!
- A recursive prefix in Neasu
- On a dichotomy of question types: the case of Mandarin Chinese and Changsha Xiang
- “Adverbs and functional heads” twenty years later: cartographic methodology, verb raising and macro/micro-variation
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Split noun phrase topicalization in Eshkevarat Gilaki
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- No case tampering once transfer domain is formed!
- A recursive prefix in Neasu
- On a dichotomy of question types: the case of Mandarin Chinese and Changsha Xiang
- “Adverbs and functional heads” twenty years later: cartographic methodology, verb raising and macro/micro-variation
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Split noun phrase topicalization in Eshkevarat Gilaki