Home Linguistics & Semiotics On a dichotomy of question types: the case of Mandarin Chinese and Changsha Xiang
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On a dichotomy of question types: the case of Mandarin Chinese and Changsha Xiang

  • One-Soon Her EMAIL logo , Dewei Che and Adams Bodomo
Published/Copyright: March 4, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Contrary to the conventional three-way distinction of questions: polar questions, disjunctive questions, and wh-questions, we argue for a more revealing two-way distinction of polar versus constituent questions, the latter with two subtypes: disjunctive and wh-questions. Following Bhatt, Rajesh & Veneeta Dayal. 2020. Polar question particles: Hindi-Urdu kya. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38. 1115–1144 proposal that polar questions denote singleton sets of propositions and the standard view that disjunctive and wh-questions denote sets with multiple propositions, we further characterize this dichotomy pragmatically as confirmation-seeking (CS) and information-seeking (IS), i.e., polar questions seek confirmation of the proposition put forth, while constituent questions seek information specifically targeted by the interrogative constituent. This dichotomy is formally detected in Mandarin Chinese via the question particle ma versus ne, dichotomy of fragment questions, adverb nandao ‘don’t tell me’ versus daodi ‘after all’, respective (in)ability to serve as indirect questions, and an intervention effect on constituent questions. We then discuss the typological implications of this two-way distinction and demonstrate that the Changsha dialect of Xiang, another Sinitic language, has no CS polar questions as the alleged polar questions are all disjunctive questions. This fact suggests that, while there are two major types of questions cross-linguistically, CS polar questions are not universal.


Corresponding author: One-Soon Her, Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan; and Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 108-2410-H-029-062-MY3

Award Identifier / Grant number: 109-2811-H-004-522

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the constructive comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the paper. However, we are solely responsible for any remaining errors. He is also thankful to the following scholars for their discussions and suggestions: Giorgio Arcodia, Bianca Basciao, Yupin Chen, Liching Chiu, Guglielmo Cinque, Pei-Yi Hsiao, Hung-Hisn Hsu, Haiping Long, Kun-Han Lin, Anna Morbiato, Hongquan Rao, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, Aurelijus Vijūnas, Jiun-Shiung Wu, and Niina Zhang.

  1. Research funding: O.-S. Her received the grants awarded by Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST): 108-2410-H-029-062-MY3 and 109-2811-H-004-522.

References

Allen, Cynthia. 1980. Whether in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 11(4). 789–793.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh & Veneeta Dayal. 2020. Polar question particles: Hindi-Urdu kya. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38. 1115–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09464-0.Search in Google Scholar

Biezma, María & Kyle Rawlins. 2012. Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 35. 361–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9123-z.Search in Google Scholar

Bodomo, Adams. 1997. The structure of Dagaare. Palo Alto, CA: CSLI, Stanford University.Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. Yes-no questions are not alternative questions. In Henry Hiż (ed.), Questions, 87–105. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_3Search in Google Scholar

Cavalier-Smith, Thomas. 2004. Only six kingdoms of life. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271(1545). 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2705.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Robert. 1984. Chinese question forms and their meanings. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 12(1). 86–145.Search in Google Scholar

Chiang, Min-Hua. 2009. Review of A Synchronic and Diachronic Study of the Grammar of the Chinese Xiang Dialects. By Yunji Wu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. Language and Linguistics 10(1). 197–204.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Raung-fu. 2000. The structure of Hakka interrogative sentences. Hanxue Yanjiu [Chinese studies] 18. 147–174.Search in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of functional grammar, vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Polar questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/116 (accessed 29 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612312Search in Google Scholar

Floyd, Simeon, Marianne Villermet & Joshua Birchall. 2016. Answers to polarity questions in South American languages. Paper presented at the AMAZÒNICAS VI. Colombia: Leticia.Search in Google Scholar

Gasde, Horst-Dieter. 2004. Yes/no questions and A-not-A questions in Chinese revisited. Linguistics 42(2). 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.010.Search in Google Scholar

van Gelderen, Elly. 2009. Renewal in the left periphery: Economy and the complementizer layer. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(2). 131–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.2009.01216.x.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Chung-hye & Maribel Romero. 2004. The syntax of Whether/Q…or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 527–564. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:nala.0000027674.87552.71.10.1023/B:NALA.0000027674.87552.71Search in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon & Hui-Chin Tsai. 2015. On silent elements: A case study of grand and its silent entourage. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33. 575–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9266-4.Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2016. The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701859.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hölzl, Andreas. 2018. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hsiao, Pei-Yi & One-Soon Her. 2021a. Taxonomy of questions in Taiwan Southern Min. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 47(2). 253–299. https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00029.her.Search in Google Scholar

Hsiao, Pei-Yi & One-Soon Her. 2021b. On fragment questions in Mandarin: A questions under discussion approach. Unpublished manuscript, Tunghai University.Search in Google Scholar

Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2001. Form and meaning: Negation and question in Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hsieh, Yen-ju. 2013. On negation and interrogatives in Hakka. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Hsueh-Ying. 2017. Zaitan Taiwan Keyu de yiwenju [Revisiting Questions in Taiwan Hakka]. Unpublished manuscript https://nccu.academia.edu/HsuehYingHu (accessed 10 June 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James & Masao Ochi. 2010. Syntax of the hell: Two types of dependencies. In C.-T. James Huang (ed.), Between syntax and semantics, 207–224. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203873526Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166935Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney. 1994. The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30(2). 411–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700016704.Search in Google Scholar

Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2008. The manifestation of emotion: On the Mandarin Chinese nandao-interrogation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 36(2). 211–234.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Bob Morris. 1999. Welsh answering system. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800593Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00351935.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 2006. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation. In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 289–299. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter Reprinted in Richard S. Kayne. 2010. Comparisons and contrasts, 73–81. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 2012. A note on grand and its silent entourage. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(2). 71–85.Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.005Search in Google Scholar

Kotek, Hadas. 2014. Composing questions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lai, Wenying. 2015. Hakka grammar of Taiwan: An introduction. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Seng-hian. 2010a. Syntax of Kam questions in Taiwanese. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Seng-hian. 2010b. Excising tags—distinguishing between interrogative SFPs and tag questions in Taiwanese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 8(1). 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Law, Paul. 2006. Adverbs in A-not-A questions in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15. 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-005-4916-5.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Boya. 2006. Chinese final particles and the syntax of periphery. Leiden: Leiden University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles. & Sandra. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Seo-Gim. 1984. Hakka grammar. Taipei: Student Book.Search in Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. 1998. Two empires or three? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95(17). 9720–9723. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.17.9720.Search in Google Scholar

Moser, Elena Vera. 2018. Answers to polarity questions: A typological study. Department of Linguistics. Independent Project for the Degree of Magister 15 HEC. Stockholm University. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8ea4/e9832280b0355edcceb3522b2bf30a8dcd29.pdf (accessed 22 October 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Victor Junnan. 2021. Sentence-final particles in Chinese. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Published online on 28 June 2021.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.882Search in Google Scholar

Pope, Emily Norwood. 1976. Questions and answers in English. Mouton: The Hague.Search in Google Scholar

Qi, Huyang. 2002. Yuqici yu Yuqi Xitong [Modal Particles and the Mood System]. Hefei, Anhui: Anhui Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Anhui Education Publisher].Search in Google Scholar

Ren, Ying. 2017. Yuqici ne de gongneng ji laiyuan zaiyi [Revisiting the function and the origin of the modal particle ne]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 5. 70–80.Search in Google Scholar

Ringe, Don & Ann Taylor. 2014. The development of old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ruggiero, Michael A., Dennis P. Gordon, Thomas M. Orrell, Nicolas Bailly, Thierry Bourgoin, Richard C. Brusca, Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Michael D. Guiry, Paul M. Kirk & Erik V. Thuesen. 2015. A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS One 10(4). e0119248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248.Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold & Arnold Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 155–196. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2001. Interrogative constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook, 1010–1028. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1017/CBO9781139028240.013Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Ting-Chi. 1981. Guoyu yiwenju yanju [A study on Mandarin questions]. Shida xuebao [Journal of National Taiwan Normal University] 26. 219–277.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Ting-Chi. 1984. Guoyu yiwenju yanju xulun [A further study on Mandarin questions]. Shida xuebao [Journal of National Taiwan Normal University] 29. 381–437.Search in Google Scholar

Tolskaya, Maria & Inna Tolskaya. 2008. Question particles or what? Open alternative questions in Manchu-Tungusic languages. In Edward J. Vajda (ed.), Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian languages, 97–109. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.300.10tolSearch in Google Scholar

Woese, Carl, Otto Kandler & Mark Wheelis. 1990. Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87(12). 4576–4579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Guo. 2005. The discourse function of the Chinese particle ne in statements. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 40(1). 47–82.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Guo. 2009. A unified account of the discourse function of the Chinese particle “ne”. Macrolinguistics 3. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.26478/ja2009.3.3.1.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Yunji. 2005. A synchronic and diachronic study of the grammar of the Chinese Xiang dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110927481Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Jiun-hsiung & One-Soon Her. 2019. On the dichotomy of questions in Mandarin: A formal semantic account. Unpublished manuscript. National Chung Cheng University and National Chengchi University.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Bebei. 2012. Nandao questions as a special kind of rhetorical question. In Anca Chereches (ed.), Semantic and linguistic theory (SALT) 22, 488–507. Ithaca: Cornell Linguistics Club.10.3765/salt.v22i0.2643Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Bebei. 2017. Question bias and biased question words in Mandarin, German and Bangla. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Liejiong. 2013. Are A-not-A questions alternative questions or wh-questions? In Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond, 305–319. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Search in Google Scholar

Zhan, Fangqiong. 2012. The structure and function of the Chinese copular construction. Stanford: Stanford University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-03-04
Published in Print: 2022-06-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2022-2087/html
Scroll to top button