Abstract
In this paper we offer new arguments for bivalence of morphological features. In the domain of person, we argue in support of the system using the features [±speaker] and [±hearer], on the basis of plural marking in Cheyenne. In the domain of gender, we argue in support of the system using the features [±masculine] and [±feminine], on the basis of gender agreement in Serbian coordinate structures. The property of binary systems crucial for our proposal is that they allow combinations of disagreeing feature values, given that in such systems every morphological category is represented as a combination of two values. Our main empirical goal is to show that some languages treat such combinations of disagreeing feature values (as well as combinations of agreeing values) as natural classes (e.g., Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank John Bowers, Wayne Leman, Richard Rhodes, Will Starr, and audiences at the 46th Algonquian Conference (Connecticut 2014) and the Mellon Humanities Corridor Workshop in Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics (Syracuse 2014) and participants in our seminars for helpful comments and discussion of the material presented here. Finally, we want to thank anonymous reviewers and the Editor for their careful and detailed suggestions. Any errors are our own.
References
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. In Harry Hoijer et al. (eds.), Linguistic structures of native America, 85–129. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation.Search in Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1962. The Menomini Language, vol. 1. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Missing persons: A case study in morphological universals. The Linguistic Review 25. 203–230.10.1515/TLIR.2008.005Search in Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1995. Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13. 607–647.10.1007/BF00992853Search in Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2009. Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(3). 455–496.10.1007/s11049-009-9072-6Search in Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199254125.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Despić, Miloje 2017. Investigations on Mixed Agreement: Polite Plurals, Hybrid Nouns and Coordinate Structures. Morphology 27. 253. https:/harbour/doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9301-3.10.1007/s11525-017-9301-3Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, Louise, Wayne Leman, Leroy Pine Sr. & Marie Sanchez. 2006. Cheyenne Dictionary. Lame Deer, MT: Chief Dull Knife College. http://www.cdkc.edu/cheyennedictionary/index.html.Search in Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1979. Delaware verbal morphology: A descriptive and comparative study. NewYork and London: Garland Publishing Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 425–449. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.1075/cilt.202.07halSearch in Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2006. Person hierarchies and geometry without hierarchies or geometries. Queen Mary’s Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics 6. http://webspace.qmul.ac.uk/dharbour/QMOPAL-06-Harbour.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2013. “Not plus” isn’t “not there”: bivalance in person, number and gender. In By Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 135–150. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78. 482–526.10.1353/lan.2002.0158Search in Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2008. Features on bound pronouns. In Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi theory, 35–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199213764.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. “Elsewhere” in phonology. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 93–106. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar
Leman, Wayne. 2011 (revision of the 1980 version). A Reference Grammar of the Cheyenne Language. Cheyenne Translation Project, Box 37, Busby MT.Search in Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica. 2009. On prominence hierarchies: evidence from Algonquian. Linguistic Typology 13(3). 357–38910.1515/LITY.2009.019Search in Google Scholar
Marušič, Franc, Andrew Nevins & Amanda Saksida. 2007. Last conjunct agreement in Slovenian. In FASL 16. 210–227.Search in Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 273–313.10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2Search in Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42(3). 413–444.10.1162/LING_a_00052Search in Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar
Quinn, Conor McDonough. 2006. Referential-Access Dependency in Penobscot. Ph.D dissertation. Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 2013. Person-number interaction: impoverishment and natural classes. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3). 469–492.10.1162/LING_a_00135Search in Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen & Larisa Zlatić 2003. The many faces of agreement. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. Hierarchies of person. In Woodford A. Beach, Samuel E. Fox & Shulamith Philosoph (eds.), Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 714–733. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Lexicalist vs. exoskeletal approaches to language mixing
- On binary features and disagreeing natural classes: Evidence from Cheyenne and Serbian
- VP-fronting: Movement vs. dislocation
- Alternating adjectives
- Spelling out enclitics and giving their tone a voice: Cyclic clitic incorporation in BCS and breaking the cycle
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Lexicalist vs. exoskeletal approaches to language mixing
- On binary features and disagreeing natural classes: Evidence from Cheyenne and Serbian
- VP-fronting: Movement vs. dislocation
- Alternating adjectives
- Spelling out enclitics and giving their tone a voice: Cyclic clitic incorporation in BCS and breaking the cycle