Home Alternating adjectives
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Alternating adjectives

  • Gillian Ramchand EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 5, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The paper describes a puzzle in the semantics of a class of English adjectives which alternate systematically in meaning. We know from the literature on adjectival meanings that the STIMULUS vs. EXPERIENCER pair of roles forms the basis of two kinds of adjectives in English depending on whether the STIMULUS or the EXPERIENCER is the one who holds the property. Our puzzle adjectives alternate between these two readings in a way parallel to the morphologically marked adjectival participles (in -ed vs. -ing) of Object Experiencer verbs. I argue further that there are reasons to think that the relationship between these two roles in this alternation is a stative version of causation, with the STIMULUS reading of the adjective being derived from the Psych EXPERIENCER reading. The existence of this alternation shows that within simple property ascriptions (of which adjectival predication is a prototypical expression) a distinction is made between Holders of properties simpliciter, and Holders of causational-properties. Thus, in analysing this adjectival puzzle as a parallel to verbal diathesis, the paper contributes to the debate on the similarities and differences between states and dynamic events.

References

Adger, D. 2007. Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. In I. Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 23–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arad, M. 1999. What counts as a class? the case of psych verbs. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 35, Cambridge, MA, 1–23. Proceedings from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon.Search in Google Scholar

Asher, N. 2000. Facts, events, propositions and evolutive anaphora. In F. P. James Hig- ginbotham & A. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, 123–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. 2003. Lexical categories. Number 102 in Cambridge Studies in Lingusitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615047Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, A. & L. Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 291–352.10.1007/BF00133902Search in Google Scholar

Bennis, H. J. 2004. Unergative adjectives and psych verbs. In E. A. Artemis Alexiadou (ed.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 30–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, V. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In J. Guéron & L. Tasmowski (eds.), Temps et point de vue/Time and point of view, 213–246. Paris: Publidix, Université Paris X.Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, J. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 591–656.Search in Google Scholar

Brekke, M. 1988. The experiencer constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 169–180.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, B. 2014. Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in english. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32. 363–422.10.1007/s11049-014-9227-ySearch in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1990. Ergative adjectives and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(1). 1–39.10.1017/CBO9780511554261.008Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. 2004. Structure of the resultative participles in english. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 355–592.10.1162/0024389041402634Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. E. 1991. Subcategorization and syntax-based theta-role assignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9(3). 369–429.10.1007/BF00135353Search in Google Scholar

Faraci, R. 1974. Aspects of the grammar of infinitives and for-phrases. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph. D. thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs; 18. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hay, J., C. Kennedy & B. Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “Degree Achievements”. In T. Matthews & D. Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IX, 127–144. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833Search in Google Scholar

Hegarty, M. 2003. Semantic types of abstract entities. Lingua 113. 891–927.10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00131-6Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, C. & L. McNally. 2005. Scale structure and the semantic typology of grad- able predicates. Language 81. 2.10.1353/lan.2005.0071Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, A. 1996. Severing the external argument from the verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Lèger, C. 2010. Sentential complementation of adjectives in French. In P. Cabredo- Hofherr & O. Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 265–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.153.08legSearch in Google Scholar

Landau, I. 1999. Psych adjectives and semantic selection. In WCCFL 18 Proceedings.10.1515/tlir.1999.16.4.333Search in Google Scholar

Landau, I. 2009. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8387.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levin, B. & M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, B. & M. Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Research Surveys in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610479Search in Google Scholar

Meltzer-Asscher, A. 2010. Present participles: Categorial classification and derivation. Lingua 120. 2211–2239.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Meltzer-Asscher, A. 2011. Adjectives and argument structure. Tel Aviv University Ph. D. thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stephenson, T. 2007. Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 30. 487–525.10.1007/s10988-008-9023-4Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, T. 1983. Subjects across categories. Linguistic Review 2(3). 285–312.Search in Google Scholar

Temme, A. 2014. German psych-adjectives. In Zwischen Kern und Peripherie: Unter-suchungen zu Randbereichen in Sprache und Grammatic, Number 76 in Studia Grammatica. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1524/9783050065335.131Search in Google Scholar

van Voorst, J. 1992. The aspectual semantics of psychological verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(1). 65–92.10.1007/BF00635833Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, T. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow & J. Bresnan (eds.), Formal syntax, 327–360. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-6-5
Published in Print: 2018-6-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2017-0023/html
Scroll to top button