Abstract
This paper offers an analysis of NP ellipsis with adjectival remnants in Polish and Hungarian based on an investigation of the featural composition of heads contained within the extended nominal and adjectival projections, as well as configurations resulting from an application of Agree and the Principle of Chain Reduction. Elliptical NPs are analysed as headed by categorising n heads lacking a complement. Whereas in Polish NP-internal agreement results in such heads being defective goals, treated as lower copies at the SM interface, and hence being unpronounced, in Hungarian, where most NP-internal modifiers do not agree with the head nouns, the content of the n head (i. e. {[Num: β], [Case: γ]} on the current assumptions) is realised on the final NP-internal modifier inside elliptical NPs. The difference between Polish and Hungarian with respect to the (lack of the) effect of NP-internal agreement on the elliptical patterns follows from the differences in the features of functional categories and the timing of Spell-Out/Transfer. The discussion suggests that the distinction between NP and DP languages should be taken into consideration in analyses of ellipsis in the nominal domain.
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2009. Roots and lexicality in distributed morphology. York Papers in Linguistics 2. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar
Alberti, Gábor & Judit Farkas. 2013, forthcoming. Nouns: Characterization and classification. István Kenesei (ed.), In Comprehensive grammar resources – Hungarian: The noun phrase. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bartos, Huba. 1999. Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció. A magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere [Morphosyntax and interpretation. The syntactic background of the Hungarian inflectional phenomena]. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories, 179–242. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614511601.179Search in Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405.10.1023/A:1008324218506Search in Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Alexandru Nicolae. 2012. Nominal ellipsis as definiteness and anaphoricity: The case of Romanian. Lingua 122. 1070–1111.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.05.001Search in Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 1992. Left branch extraction. In Kimberly Broderick (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 22, 67–84. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert & Marjo van Koppen. 2011. NP-ellipsis with adjectival remnants: A micro-comparative perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 371–421.10.1007/s11049-011-9140-6Search in Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi. 2011. Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14. 297–317.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00154.xSearch in Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva. 2011. A profile of the Hungarian DP: The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755088Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David & Alec Marantz. 2006. Architecture and blocking. University of Pennsylvania and MIT MS.Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Lena Ibnbari & Sharon Taube. 2013. Missing objects as topic drop. Lingua 136. 145–169.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.009Search in Google Scholar
Frampton, John & Sam Gutman. 2000. Agreement is feature sharing. Northeastern University MS.Search in Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Melita Stavrou. 1999. Nominalization and ellipsis in the Greek DP. The Linguistic Review 16. 295–332.10.1515/tlir.1999.16.4.295Search in Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. The categorical status of determiners. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95–123. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78. 482–526.10.1353/lan.2002.0158Search in Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Angelica Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Kenesei, István. 1994. Subordinate clauses. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Syntax and semantics, vol. 27, 275–354. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373174_005Search in Google Scholar
Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1995. Adjectival inflection and the licensing of empty categories in DP. Journal of Linguistics 32. 57–78.10.1017/S0022226700000761Search in Google Scholar
Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996. The nature of adjectival inflection. Utrecht: OTS Dissertation Series.Search in Google Scholar
Kester, Ellen-Petra & Petra Sleeman. 2002. N-ellipsis in Spanish. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2002. 107–116.10.1075/avt.19.13kesSearch in Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó & Andrés Saab. 2012. Licensing by inflection reconsidered. The ellipsis-morphology connection in the nominal domain. Leiden: Leiden University MS.Search in Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó & Andrés Saab. 2015. Movement and deletion after syntax: Licensing by inflection reconsidered. Studia Linguistica FirstView. 1–43.Search in Google Scholar
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2008. On little n, √, and types of nouns. In Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedűs & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology, 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605789Search in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2013. Locating the verbal root. Delivered at the 25th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Reykjavík, 13–15 May. http://conference.hi.is/scl25/files/2012/06/Marantz.pdf (accessed November 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2014. Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis. Lingua 151. 9–32.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.01.008Search in Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for Person-Case Effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 273–313.10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2Search in Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos. 2003. Empty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 381–432.10.1023/A:1023384924981Search in Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos. 2011. Categorial features and categorizers. The Linguistic Review 28. 365–386.10.1515/tlir.2011.010Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture. Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 501–557.10.4324/9780203461785-6Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés. 2010. (Im)possible deletions in the Spanish DP. Iberia 2. 45–83.Search in Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_11Search in Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna, 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. In István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian 2: Theories and analyses, 167–191. Szeged: József Attila University.Search in Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Syntax and semantics, vol. 27, 179–275. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373174_004Search in Google Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 319–346. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 2012a. Concord in Polish coordinate NPs as Agree. In Markéta Ziková & Mojmír Dočekal (eds.), Slavic languages in formal grammar, 233–254. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 2012b. On the feature valuation/interpretability biconditional in Minimalist Theory. The case of (un)interpretable gender. In Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds.), Sound, structure and sense. Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann, 761–806. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Search in Google Scholar
Yoshida, Masaya, Honglei Wang & David Potter. 2012. Remarks on ‘gapping’ in DP. Linguistic Inquiry 43. 475–494.10.1162/LING_a_00098Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Ellipsis: licensing, structure and identity
- What ellipsis can do for phases and what it can’t, but not how
- Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese
- Gapping also needs vP-coordination: An argument from French NPI licensing
- Case and remnants in sluicing
- Evidence for deletion in as-parentheticals
- Constraints on aspectual complement ellipsis. The view from Romanian
- NP ellipsis (effects) in Polish and Hungarian: FFs on Fs, Agree, and Chain Reduction
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Ellipsis: licensing, structure and identity
- What ellipsis can do for phases and what it can’t, but not how
- Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese
- Gapping also needs vP-coordination: An argument from French NPI licensing
- Case and remnants in sluicing
- Evidence for deletion in as-parentheticals
- Constraints on aspectual complement ellipsis. The view from Romanian
- NP ellipsis (effects) in Polish and Hungarian: FFs on Fs, Agree, and Chain Reduction