The Foot is not an obligatory constituent of the Prosodic Hierarchy: “stress” in Turkish, French and child English

References

Alderete, John. 1997. Root-controlled accent in Cupeño. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst [ROA 253].Search in Google Scholar

Alderete, John. 2001. Root-controlled accent in Cupeño. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19. 455–502.10.4324/9781315054834-9Search in Google Scholar

Altshuler, Daniel. 2009. Quantity insensitive iambs in Osage. International Journal of American Linguistics 75. 365–398.10.1086/605417Search in Google Scholar

Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20. 1–42.10.1023/A:1014245408622Search in Google Scholar

Archangeli, Diana. 1984–1985. Extrametricality in Yawelmani. The Linguistic Review 4. 101–110.10.1515/tlir.1985.4.2.101Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, Susan. 1999. Stress and weight in Québec French. MA thesis, University of Calgary.Search in Google Scholar

Avgustinova, Tania. 1997. Word order and clitics in Bulgarian. Saarbrücken: University of the Saarland.Search in Google Scholar

Baerman, Matthew. 2004. Poststressing complementizers in Erkec (Kozicino). In Revitalizing Bulgarian dialectology. University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection.Search in Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110874020Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Ryan. 2013. The uniqueness of metrical structure: Rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano. Phonology 30. 355–98.10.1017/S0952675713000195Search in Google Scholar

Berwick, Robert C. 1985. The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1074.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bickmore, Lee. 1995. Tone and stress in Lamba. Phonology 12. 307–41.10.1017/S0952675700002542Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, Thaddeus. 1894. Rhythm. American Journal of Psychology 6. 145–238.10.2307/1410948Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1958. A theory of pitch-accent in English. Word 14. 109–149.10.1080/00437956.1958.11659660Search in Google Scholar

Brulard, Inès & Philip Carr. 2003. French-English bilingual acquisition of phonology: One production system or two? International Journal of Bilingualism 7(2). 177–203.10.1177/13670069030070020401Search in Google Scholar

Caballero, Gabriela. 2011. Morphologically conditioned stress assignment in Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara). Linguistics 49(4). 749–79010.1515/ling.2011.023Search in Google Scholar

Çakır, Cem. 2000. On non-final stress in Turkish simplex words. In A. Goksel & C. Kerslake (eds.), Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 3–10. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Charette, Monik. 1991. Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554339Search in Google Scholar

Charette, Monik. 2008. The vital role of the trochaic foot in explaining Turkish word endings. Lingua 118. 46–65.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Stuart. 1988. Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5. 1–19.10.1017/S0952675700002177Search in Google Scholar

de Lacy, Paul. 2002. The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory. Phonology 19. 1–32.10.1017/S0952675702004220Search in Google Scholar

Delattre, Pierre. 1966. A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 4. 183–198.10.1515/iral.1966.4.1-4.183Search in Google Scholar

Dell, François. 1984. L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In F. Dell, D. Hirst & J.-R. Vergnaud (eds.), Forme sonore du langage, 65–122. Paris: Hermann.Search in Google Scholar

Demuth, Katherine. 1995. Markedness and development of prosodic structure. In J. Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS 25), 13–25. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massacchusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Di Cristo, Albert. 1998. Intonation in French. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (eds.), Intonation systems, 203–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovolsky, Michael. 1999. The phonetics of Chuvash stress: Implications for phonology. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences, 539–542.Search in Google Scholar

Dresher, Elan & Jonathan Kaye. 1990. A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34. 137–195.10.1016/0010-0277(90)90042-ISearch in Google Scholar

Duanmu, San. 1999. Metrical structure and tone: evidence from Mandarin and Shanghai. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8. 1–38.10.1023/A:1008353028173Search in Google Scholar

Dupoux, Emmanuel, Christophe Pallier, Nuria Sabastian-Galles & Jacques Mehler. 1997. A distressing “deafness” in French. Journal of Memory and Language 36. 406–421.10.1006/jmla.1996.2500Search in Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel. 2003. Iambic feet in Paumari and the theory of foot structure. Linguistic Discovery 2. 22–44.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.263Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 2001. Focus and phrasing in French. In C. Féry & W. Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur vox sapientiae: A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.10.1515/9783050080116.153Search in Google Scholar

Fikkert, Paula. 1994. On the acquisition of prosodic structure. PhD dissertation, Leiden University/HIL. Published 1994, The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Search in Google Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan. 1966. Electrophysiological and acoustic correlates of stress and stress perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 9. 231–244.10.1044/jshr.0902.231Search in Google Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan. 1979. L’accent français: Accent probabilitaire. In I. Fónagy & P. Léon (eds.), L’accent en français contemporain, 123–233. Montréal/Paris/Brussels/Ottawa: Didier.Search in Google Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan. 1980. L’accent français: Accent probabilitaire. L’Accent en français contemporain. Studia Phonetica 15. 123–233.Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, Edward. 1999. Minimal words aren’t minimal feet. In M. Gordon (ed.), UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, no.1, Papers in Phonology 2, 68–105. Los Angeles: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Genesee, Fred. 1989. Early bilingual development: One language or two?. Journal of Child Language 16. 161–179.10.4324/9781003060406-30Search in Google Scholar

Genesee, Fred. 2001. Bilingual first language acquisition: exploring the limits of the languagefaculty. In M. McGroarty (ed.), 21st Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 153–168. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/S0267190501000095Search in Google Scholar

Genesee, Fred & Elena Nicoladis. 2006. Bilingual acquisition. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (eds.), Handbook of language development. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Genesee, Fred, Elena Nicoladis & Johanne Paradis. 1995. Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language 22. 611–631.10.1017/S0305000900009971Search in Google Scholar

Goad, Heather. 1997. Codas, word minimality, and empty-headed syllables. Child Language Research Forum 28. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. 113–122.Search in Google Scholar

Goad, Heather. to appear. Phonological processes in child speech. In J. Lidz, W. Snyder & J. Pater (eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goad, Heather & Adèle-Elise Prévost. 2008. Is there a foot in L1 French? The competing roles of markedness and ambient input. Paper presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) 38, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Search in Google Scholar

Goad, Heather & Adèle-Elise Prévost. 2011. A test case for markedness: The acquisition of Québec French stress. Ms., McGill University.Search in Google Scholar

Goad, Heather & Lydia White. 2009. Articles in Turkish/English interlanguage revisited: Implications of vowel harmony. In P. García-Mayo & R. Hawkins (eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications, 201–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.49.13goaSearch in Google Scholar

Goad, Heather & Meaghen Buckley. 2006. Prosodic structure in child French: Evidence for the foot. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5. 109–142.10.5565/rev/catjl.81Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 2000. Re-examining default-to-opposite stress. In Proceedings of the 26th Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 26). 101–112.10.3765/bls.v26i1.1153Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 2002. A factorial typology of quantity-insensitive stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 491–552.10.1023/A:1015810531699Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 2011. Stress systems. In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle & A. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 141–163. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343069.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In H. van der Hulst (ed.), Word accent: theoretical and typological issues, 83–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600408.005Search in Google Scholar

Grammont, Maurice. 1933. Traité de phonétique. Paris: Librairie Delagrave.Search in Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616983Search in Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2007. Intonation. In Paul de Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 253–280. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.012Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Mark & Charles Reiss. 2003. The subset principle in phonology: Why the tabula can’t be rasa. Journal of Linguistics 39. 219–244.10.1017/S0022226703002019Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1978. Metrical structures in phonology. Ms, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, Aaron. 1995. On the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, Michael. 2011. The foot. In M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume & K Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2, 949–979. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hannahs, S. J. 2009. Welsh svarabhakti: Sonority sequencing and foot structure. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 13. 21–44.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1981. A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. [distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club].Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1982. Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 227–276.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1985. Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules. In M. Niepokuj et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 11), 429–446. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.10.3765/bls.v11i0.1898Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1987. A revised parametric metrical theory. In J. McDonough & B. Plunket (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th North East Linguistic Society (NELS 17), 274–289. Amherst: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1991/1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Manuscript. University of California, Los Angeles: Published by the University of Chicago Press in 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Urban T. 1927. The phonology of an English-speaking child. American Speech 2. 219–225.10.2307/452312Search in Google Scholar

Hoskins, Steven. 1994. Secondary stress and clash resolution in French: An empirical investigation. In M. Mazzola (ed.), Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected Papers from the 18th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 18), 35–47. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José Ignacio, Gorka Elordieta, Iñaki Gamind & Rajka Smiljanic. 2002. From pitch-accent to stress-accent in Basque. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology, 7, 547– 584. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197105.2.547Search in Google Scholar

Hulst, Harry van der. 1999. Word accent. In H. van der Hulst (ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe, 3–115. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Hulst, Harry van der. 2012. Deconstructing stress. Lingua 122. 1494–1521.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.011Search in Google Scholar

Hulst, Harry van der. 2014. Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600408Search in Google Scholar

Hulst, Harry van der & Jeroen van de Weijer. 1991. Topics in Turkish phonology. In H. Boeschoten & L. Verhoeven (eds.), Turkish linguistics today, 11–59. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Hulst, Harry van der & Jeroen van de Weijer. 1995. Vowel harmony. In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 495–534. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hulst, Harry van der & Norval Smith. 1982. Prosodic domains and opaque segments in autosegmental phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, 311–336. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112423325-009Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 1977. On the nature of linguistic stress. In L. Hyman (ed.), Studies in stress and accent, 37–82. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23. 225–257.10.1017/S0952675706000893Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31: 213–238.10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2010. Kuki-Thaadow: An African tone system in Southeast Asia. In F. Floricic (ed.), Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale, 31–51. Lyon, France: Les Presses de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2014. Do all languages have word accent? In H. van der Hulst (ed.), Word accent: Theoretical and typological issues, 56–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600408.004Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon. 1999. The exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: Representations versus the grammar. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst & W. Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody-morphology interface, 134–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627729.006Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Cemil Orhan Orgun. 1995. Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish. Language 71. 763–793.10.2307/415744Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Cemil Orhan Orgun. 1998. Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: evidence from Turkish. In S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari & P. M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 360–410. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Cemil Orhan Orgun. 2003. Turkish stress: A review. Phonology 20. 139–161.10.1017/S0952675703004482Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Cheryl Zoll. 2007. Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45. 133–171.10.1515/LING.2007.004Search in Google Scholar

Ipek, Canan & Sun-Ah Jun. 2013. Towards a model of intonational phonology of Turkish: Neutral intonation. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19. 1–9.10.1121/1.4799755Search in Google Scholar

Ito, Junko. 1990. Prosodic minimality in Japanese. In K. Deaton et al. (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society Papers from the parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology, 213–239. Chicago: University of Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Ito, Junko & Armin Mester. 2013. Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124. 20–40.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.016Search in Google Scholar

Ito, Junko & Jorge Hankamer. 1989. Notes on monosyllabism in Turkish. Phonology at Santa Cruz 1. 61–69.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1941/68. Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. Mouton: The Hague.Search in Google Scholar

Jun & Fougeron. 2002. The Realizations of the accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus 14. 147–172.10.1515/prbs.2002.002Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. 1995. A phonetic study of stress in Korean. Poster presented at the 130th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. St. Louis, MO.Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. 1998. The Accentual Phrase in the Korean Prosodic Hierarchy. Phonology 15. 189–226.10.1017/S0952675798003571Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Korean Intonational Phonology. In S.-A. Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 201–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron. 2000. A phonological model of French intonation. In A. Botinis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology, 209–242. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-4317-2_10Search in Google Scholar

Kabak, Barış & Irene Vogel. 2001. The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18. 315–360.10.1017/S0952675701004201Search in Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1993a. The moraic iamb. In L. Dobrin, L. Nichols & R. Rodriguez (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 27). Volume One: The General Session, 291–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1993b. Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11. 381–432.10.1007/BF00993165Search in Google Scholar

Kager, René. 2001. Rhythmic directionality by positional licensing. Paper presented at the 5 the HIL Phonology Conference, University of Potsdam.Search in Google Scholar

Kager, René. 2007. Feet and metrical stress. In P. de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 195–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.010Search in Google Scholar

Kaisse, Ellen. 1985. Some theoretical consequences of stress rules in Turkish. Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 21:1). 199–209.Search in Google Scholar

Kaisse, Ellen. 1986. Toward a lexical phonology of Turkish. In M. Brame, H. Contreras & F. Newmeyer (eds.), A Festschrift for Sol Saporta, 231–239. Seattle: Noit Amrofer.Search in Google Scholar

Kehoe, Margaret, Conxita Lleó & Martin Rakow. 2004. Voice onset time in bilingual German-Spanish children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7. 71–88.10.1017/S1366728904001282Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 421–442.Search in Google Scholar

Konrot, Ahmet. 1981. Physical correlates of linguistic stress in Turkish. University of Sussex Language Centre Occasional Papers 24. 26–52.Search in Google Scholar

Konrot, Ahmet. 1987. Stress in Turkish: Is it determined phonologically or morphologically? In H. E. Boeschoten & L. T. Verheoven (eds.), Studies on modern Turkish: Proceedings of the third conference on Turkish linguistics. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krueger, John Richard. 1961. Chuvash manual: Uralic and Altaic series 7. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leben, William R. 1997. Tonal feet and the adaptation of English borrowing into Hausa. Studies in African Linguistics 25. 139–54.10.32473/sal.v25i2.107400Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Hyon-Bok. 1964. A study of Korean (Seoul) intonation. MA Thesis, University College London.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Ho-Young. 1990. The structure of Korean prosody. PhD Dissertation, University of London.Search in Google Scholar

Lees, Robert B. 1961. The phonology of Modern Standard Turkish. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Léon, Pierre R. 1972. Prononciation du français standard. Aide mémoire d’orthoépie à l’usage des étudiants étrangers. Paris: Didier.Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Susannah V. 2005. Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(1). 73 –97.10.1017/S0025100305001921Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Geoffrey. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark & Alan Prince. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249–336.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Byung-Jin. 2001. The role of syllable weight and position on prominence in Korean. Japanese Korean Linguistics 9. 139–150Search in Google Scholar

Lleó, Conxita. 2002. The role of markedness in the acquisition of complex prosodic structures in German-Spanish bilinguals. The International Journal of Bilingualism 6. 291–314.10.1177/13670069020060030501Search in Google Scholar

Lleó, Conxita, Martin Rakow & Margaret Kehoe. 2004. Acquisition of language specific pitch accent by Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual children. In Timothy L. Face (ed.) Laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology. 3–27. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Lleó, Conxita, Imme Kuchenbrandt, Margaret Kehoe & Cristina Trujillo. 2003. Syllable final consonants in Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual acquisition. In N. Müller (ed.) (In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism. Hamburg studies in multilingualism, 191–220. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hsm.1.08lleSearch in Google Scholar

MacDonald, Lorna. 1990. A grammar of Tauya. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846027Search in Google Scholar

Malmberg, Bertil. 1969. Phonétique française. Lund: Liber Läromedel.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe. 1975. Analyse phonologique de la phrase française. Linguistics 146. 35–67.10.1515/ling.1975.13.146.35Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe. 1980. Sur les principes d’une théorie syntaxique de l’intonation. In L. Rossi (ed.), Problèmes de Prosodie. Vol 1. (Studia Phonetica 17.), 91–101. Paris: Didier.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Philippe. 1987. Prosodic and rhythmic structures in French. Linguistics 25. 925–949.10.1515/ling.1987.25.5.925Search in Google Scholar

Mazzola, Michael. 1992. Stress clash and segment deletion. In C. Laeufer & T. Morgan (eds.), Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 19th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 19), 81–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.74.07mazSearch in Google Scholar

Mazzola, Michael. 1993. French rhythm and French segments. In W. Ashby, M. Mithun, G. Perissinotto & E. Raposo (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on the Romance languages: Selected Papers from the 21st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 21), 113–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.103.14mazSearch in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. 2003. OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20, 75–138.10.1017/S0952675703004470Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. 2004. Optimality Theory in phonology: A reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756171Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms., Brandeis University and University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1993a. Generalized Alignment. In G. E. Booij, & J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince. 1993b. Prosodic Morphology: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Rutgers University. Available as ROA-482 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1999. Faithfulness and identity in Prosodic Morphology. In H. van der Hulst, R. Kager & W. Zonneveld (eds.), The Morphology-Prosody Interface, 218–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627729.008Search in Google Scholar

Meisel, Jürgen. 1989. Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In K. Hyltenstam & L. K. Obler (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan. Aspects of acquisition, maturity, and loss, 13–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611780.003Search in Google Scholar

Mertens, Pierre. 1990. Intonation. In C. Blanche-Benveniste, M. Bilger, C. Rouget & K. van den Eynde (eds.), Le Français parlé, 159–176. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Search in Google Scholar

Mertens, Piet. 1987. L’intonation du français. De la description linguistique à la reconnaissance automatique. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Search in Google Scholar

Michelson, Karin. 1988. A Comparative Study of Lake Iriquoian Accent. Dordrecht: Kluwar.10.1007/978-94-009-2709-4Search in Google Scholar

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 1995. Coda weight and vowel length in Québec French. In J. Amastae, G. Goodall, M. Montalbetti & M. Phinney (eds.), Contemporary research in Romance linguistics. Papers from the 22nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 22), 25–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.123.04monSearch in Google Scholar

Montreuil, Jean-Pierre. 2002. Vestigial feet in French. In Proceedings of the 2002 Texas Linguistic Society Conference on Stress in Optimality Theory. University of Texas Austin.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Natascha & Aafke Hulk. 2001. Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4. 1–21.10.1017/S1366728901000116Search in Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Newell, Heather. 2005. The Phonological Phrase. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 19. 21–64.Search in Google Scholar

Newman, Stanley. 1944. The Yokuts Language of California. New York: The Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Newman, Stanley. 1947. Bella Coola I: phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics. 13. 129–134.10.1086/463942Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, Öner. 2013. Exceptions in stress assignment: Feet in input. In Seda Kan, Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds.), Papers from the 40th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 40). 107–120. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, Öner. 2014. Prosodic faithfulness to foot edges: The case of Turkish stress. Phonology 31. 229–269.10.1017/S0952675714000128Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, Öner & Miho Nagai. 2010. Possible syntactic subject positions in Turkish: Evidence from phonology. In H. Maezawa & A. Yokogoshi (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 6). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL).Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, Öner & Miho Nagai. 2011. Multiple subject positions: A case of perfect match between syntax and prosody. In M. Byram & B. Tomaszewicz (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference for Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 28), 303–312. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Paradis, Claude & Denise Deshaies. 1990. Rules of stress assignment in Québec French: Evidence from perceptual data. Language Variation and Change 2: 135–154.10.1017/S0954394500000314Search in Google Scholar

Paradis, Johanne & Fred Genesee. 1996. Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 1–25.10.1017/S0272263100014662Search in Google Scholar

Pater, Joe. 2000. Nonuniformity in English stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17. 237–274.10.1017/S0952675700003900Search in Google Scholar

Pater, Joe. 2006 The locus of exceptionality: Morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. In L. Bateman, M. O’Keefe, E. Reilly, and A. Werle (eds.), Papers in pptimality theory III. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, Mary. 2006. The interaction between metrical structure and tone in Kera. Phonology 23. 259–86.10.1017/S095267570600090XSearch in Google Scholar

Peperkamp, Sharon, & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2002. A typological study of stress “deafness.” In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (eds.), Laboratory phonology, 7, 203–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197105.1.203Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. PhD thesis, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumber, Janet B. & Mary E. Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piggott, Glyne. 1993. Satisfying the minimal word. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Piggott, Glyne. 1995. Epenthesis and syllable weight. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13. 283–326.10.1007/BF00992784Search in Google Scholar

Piggott, Glyne. 1998. Foot form and the parsing of weightless syllables. Proceedings of the 34th Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 34). 315–332.Search in Google Scholar

Post, Brechtje. 2000. Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Search in Google Scholar

Post, Brechtje. 2003. French phrasing and accentuation in different speaking styles. In E. Grabe & D. Wright (eds.), Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics, 8, 69–83. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Poser, William J. 1999. Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Language 66. 78–105.10.1353/lan.1990.0031Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Alan. 1983. Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 19–100.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470759400Search in Google Scholar

Pycha, Anne. 2006. A duration-based solution to the problem of stress realization in Turkish. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. 141–151.10.5070/P74D40X6JGSearch in Google Scholar

Revithiadou, Anthi, Hasan Kaili, Sophia Prokou & Maria-Anna Tiliopoulou. 2006. Turkish accentuation revisited: A compositional approach to Turkish stress. In S. Yağcıoğlu, A.Cem Değer, Ö. Koşaner & A. Çeltek (eds.), Advances in Turkish linguistics: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 37–50. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar

Revithiadou, Anthi. & Ruben van de Vijver. 1997. Durational contrasts and the Iambic/Trochaic Law. In V. Samiian (ed.), Proceedings of WECOL, 229–242. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, Mario. 1980. Le français, langue sans accent? In I. Fónagy & P. P. Léon (eds.). L’accent en français contemporain (Studia Phonetica 15), 13–51. Montréal: Didier.Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1930. Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 65, 1–296.10.2307/20026309Search in Google Scholar

Scheer, Tobias. 2011. Portrait of a phonological cripple: What schwa can(not) do to preceding vowels in French and elsewhere. Handout, the International Workshop on Metrics, Phonology and Acquisition. University Paris, June.Search in Google Scholar

Schiering, Rene, Balthasar Bickel, & Kristine A. Hildebrandt. 2010. The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics 46, 657–709.10.1017/S0022226710000216Search in Google Scholar

Scullen, Mary Ellen. 1997. French prosodic morphology: A unified account. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1978. The French foot: On the status of the ‘mute’ e. Studies in French Linguistics 1. 141–150.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1980. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 563–605.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In J. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 550–569. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1996. The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar, 187–213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Sezer, Engin. 1981. The k/0 alternation in Turkish. In G. N. Clements (ed.), Harvard studies in phonology, Vol. 2, 354–382. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Sezer, Engin. 1983. On non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of Turkish Studies 5. 61–69.Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, Patricia. 1985. Coexistent and competing stress rules in Stoney (Dakota). International Journal of American Linguistics 51, 1–18.10.1086/465857Search in Google Scholar

Thibault, Linda & Marise Ouellet. 1996. Tonal distinctions between emphatic stress and pretonic lengthening in Quebec French. In the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 1996. 638–641.10.1109/ICSLP.1996.607442Search in Google Scholar

Tranel, Bernard. 1987. The sounds of French: An introduction. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620645Search in Google Scholar

Underhill, Robert. 1976. Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1974. On French prosody. Quarterly Progress Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Research Laboratory of Electronics. No 114. 212–223.Search in Google Scholar

Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1983. Language-independent prosodic features. In A. Cutler & D. R. Ladd (eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements, 53–66. Berlin: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-69103-4_5Search in Google Scholar

Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1997. Langues, prosodie et syntaxe. Traitement Automatique des Langues 38. 53–82.Search in Google Scholar

Vaux, Bert. 1998. The phonology of Armenian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

van de Vijver, Ruben. 1998. The iambic issue: iambs as the result of constraint interaction. PhD dissertation, HIL dissertation series 37. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.Search in Google Scholar

Verluyten, S. Paul. 1982. Investigation on French prosodics and metrics. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen.Search in Google Scholar

Verluyten, S. Paul. 1988. La Phonologie du schwa français. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lis.16Search in Google Scholar

Vogel, Irene. 2009. Universals of prosodic structure. In S. Scalise, E. Magni, & A. Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 59–82. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_4Search in Google Scholar

Yip, Moira. 1980. The tonal phonology of Chinese. PhD dissertation, MIT.10.3406/clao.1980.1072Search in Google Scholar

Yip, Virginia & Stephen Matthews. 2000. Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese–English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3. 193–208.10.1017/S136672890000033XSearch in Google Scholar

Walker, Douglas C. 1984. The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wioland, François. 1991. Prononcer les mots du français: des sons et des rythmes. Paris: Hachette.Search in Google Scholar

Zec, Draga. 1999. Footed tones and tonal feet: Metrical constituency in a pitch accent language. Phonology 16. 225–64.10.1017/S0952675799003759Search in Google Scholar