Published Online: 2023-11-30
Published in Print: 2023-12-15
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Target Article: Kathryn Barnes, Cornelia Ebert; Issue Editor: Hans-Martin Gärtner
- The information status of iconic enrichments: modelling gradient at-issueness
- Comments
- Some remarks on the fine structure of ideophones and the meaning of structure
- Gradient at-issueness, minimum relevance, and propositional prominence
- Gradient at-issueness versus uncertainty about binary at-issueness
- Gradient at-issueness and semiotic complexity in gesture: a response
- On the typology of iconic contributions
- At-issueness across modalities – are gestural components (more) at-issue in sign languages?
- Reply
- Iconicity and gradient at-issueness: insights and future avenues
- Reply to Comments on “Wh-questions in dynamic inquisitive semantics” (TL 49.1/2)
- Dynamic inquisitive semantics—looking ahead and looking back
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Target Article: Kathryn Barnes, Cornelia Ebert; Issue Editor: Hans-Martin Gärtner
- The information status of iconic enrichments: modelling gradient at-issueness
- Comments
- Some remarks on the fine structure of ideophones and the meaning of structure
- Gradient at-issueness, minimum relevance, and propositional prominence
- Gradient at-issueness versus uncertainty about binary at-issueness
- Gradient at-issueness and semiotic complexity in gesture: a response
- On the typology of iconic contributions
- At-issueness across modalities – are gestural components (more) at-issue in sign languages?
- Reply
- Iconicity and gradient at-issueness: insights and future avenues
- Reply to Comments on “Wh-questions in dynamic inquisitive semantics” (TL 49.1/2)
- Dynamic inquisitive semantics—looking ahead and looking back