Home Effect of lip-thickness on rectangular nozzle co-flowing subsonic jet
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of lip-thickness on rectangular nozzle co-flowing subsonic jet

  • Ezhilmaran Gopalakrishnan ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Surendra Bogadi , Thanigaiarasu Subramanian and Sekar Subramani
Published/Copyright: March 13, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The reduction in the potential core length and the enhancement of mixing by varying the lip thickness with co-flowing jets through a rectangular nozzle have been investigated using both computational and experimental methods. The lip thickness of a nozzle is defined as the thickness of the primary nozzle wall that separates the primary and secondary co-flowing jets at the nozzle exit. A baseline rectangular nozzle with a hydraulic diameter of 6 mm and three co-flow nozzles with annular co-flows with lip thicknesses (LT) of 25 %, 50 %, and 75 % of the baseline hydraulic diameter were designed and studied for a subsonic jet Mach number of 0.8.The jet centerline pressure decay, radial total pressure decay, and jet mixing behavior were analyzed. The results show that increasing the lip thickness enhances the mixing characteristics of the primary and secondary flows. The reduction in the potential core length was 39.39 % for the 75 % LT configuration compared with that of the plain convergent rectangular nozzle, and 7.27 % and 19.24 % for the 25 % and 50 % LT configurations, respectively.


Corresponding author: Ezhilmaran Gopalakrishnan, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Mangalore Institute of Technology & Engineering, Moodbidri, 574225, India, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Ezhilmaran Gopalakrishnan investigated the problem, analyzed the data, Surendra Bogadi wrote the first draft, Thanigaiarasu Subramanian, and Sekar Subramani supervised the study, revised the first draft and edited the final version.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: R Discovery, an AI enhanced research finding platform has been used for compilation of literature articles and references.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

Nomenclature

DH

hydraulic diameter (m)

FMZ

Fully merged zone

IMZ

Intermediate merging zone

IZ

Initial merging zone

k

Turbulent kinetic energy ( m 2 S 2

LT

Lip-thickness (m)

M

Mach number

Po

Stagnation chamber pressure (MPa)

Pt

Total pressure (MPa)

X/D

Axial distance

Z/D

Radial distance

ε

Turbulent Dissipation Rate (m2/s3)

ω

Specific Dissipation Rate (1/s)

References

1. Thanigaiarasu, S, Naren Shankar, R, Rathakrishnan, E. Influence of bypass ratio on subsonic and correctly expanded sonic co-flowing jets with finite lip thickness. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 2019;233:2536–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410018782511.Search in Google Scholar

2. Kaushik, M, Rathakrishnan, E. Corrugated limiting tab for jet mixing. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2013;30:359–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2013-0016.Search in Google Scholar

3. Kamran, MA, Mcguirk, JJ. Subsonic jet mixing via active control using steady and pulsed control jets. AIAA J 2011;49:712–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j050608.Search in Google Scholar

4. Alam, M, Fontana, A, Brooks, G, Naser, J. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of supersonic coherent jets for electric arc furnace steelmaking process. Metall Mater Trans B 2010;41:1354–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-010-9436-7.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ezhilmaran, G, Khandai, SC, Pavithrabalan, S, Udhayakumar, K. Supersonic jet control by tabs with slanted perforation. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2021;38:331–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2018-0034.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ezhilmaran, G, Khandai, SC, Sinha, YK, Thanigaiarasu, S. Numerical simulation of supersonic jet control by tabs with slanted perforation. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2019;39:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2019-0015.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ezhilmaran, G, Sekar, S, Sathish Kumar, K, Thanigaiarasu, S. Investigation of slanted perforation diameter in tabs for supersonic jet control. Aircraft Eng Aero Technol 2023;95:1227–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-11-2022-0304.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bogadi, S, Sridhar, BTN. Decay of supersonic rectangular jet issuing from a nozzle with diagonal expansion ramps. Therm Sci B 2019;23:3929–40. https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci180614301b.Search in Google Scholar

9. Shankar, R, Thanigaiarasu, S, Elangovan, S, Rathakrishnan, E. Co-flowing jet control using lip thickness variation. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2021;38:289–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2018-0024.Search in Google Scholar

10. Sathish Kumar, K, Naren Shankar, R, Senthil Kumar, BR, Anusindhiya, K. Numerical analysis of supersonic Co-flow jet with varying lip thickness. Aircraft Eng Aero Technol 2021;94:198–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-05-2021-0143.Search in Google Scholar

11. Naren Shankar, R, Kevin Bennett, S. Characteristics of a Co-flowing jet with varying lip thickness and constant bypass ratio. Aircraft Eng Aero Technol 2019;91:1205–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-01-2019-0007.Search in Google Scholar

12. Aoki, T, Kweon, Y-H, Kim, H-D, Miyazato, Y, Setoguchi, T. An experimental study of the nozzle lip thickness effect on supersonic jet screech tones. J Mech Sci Technol 2006;20:522–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02916483.Search in Google Scholar

13. Bogadi, S, Sridhar, BTN. Acoustic characteristics of supersonic rectangular jets issuing from nozzles with diagonal expansion ramps. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2021;43:572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03286-w.Search in Google Scholar

14. Srinivasarao, T, Murthy, I, Lovaraju, P, Rathakrishnan, E. Effect of inner nozzle lip thickness on Co-flow jet characteristics. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2017;34:287–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2016-0004.Search in Google Scholar

15. Shankar, R, Thanigaiarasu, S, Elangovan, S, Rathakrishnan, E. Co-flowing jet control using lip thickness variation. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2021;38:289–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2018-0024.Search in Google Scholar

16. Nishino, T, Karim, S. Effect of jet nozzle lip momentum loss on circulation control airfoil performance. AIAA J 2012;50:551–8. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j051196.Search in Google Scholar

17. Naren Shankar, R, Ganesan, VG. Experimental and numerical studies of Co-flowing jets with finite lip thickness and varying bypass ratio. Adv Mater Process Technol 2022;8:4416–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068x.2022.2076987.Search in Google Scholar

18. Sharma, H, Vashishtha, A, Rathakrishnan, E, Lovaraju, P. Experimental study of overexpanded co-flowing jets. Aeronaut J 2008;112:537–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000002499.Search in Google Scholar

19. Gopinath, S, Sundararaj, M, Elangovan, S, Rathakrishnan, E. Mixing characteristics of elliptical and rectangular subsonic jets with swirling Co-flow. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2015;32:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2014-0015.Search in Google Scholar

20. Satyajit, D, Rathakrishnan, E. Experimental study of supersonic co-flowing jet. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 2019;233:1237–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017749866.Search in Google Scholar

21. Murakami, E, Papamoschou, D. Mixing layers characteristics of coaxial supersonic jets. In: 21st AIAA aeroacoustics conference. Lahaina, HI: AIAA; 2000.10.2514/6.2000-2060Search in Google Scholar

22. Chidambararaj, P, Muruganandam, T, Balusamy, K. Influence of inner lip-thickness and velocity ratio in a Coaxial Jet. In: Proceedings of the 2nd national aero propulsion conference. Kharagpur: NAPC; 2018:17–19 pp.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kevin Bennett, S, Shankar, RN. Jet noise reduction in Co-flowing jets with finite lip thickness. Int J Veh Struct Syst 2020;12:476–80. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.12.4.24.Search in Google Scholar

24. Faizal, E, Sasongko, MN, SugengWidodo, A. PengaruhVariasi lip thickness pada nozzle TerpancungTerhadapKarakteristik api PembakaranDifusi concentric jet flow. J Rekayasa Mesin 2016;7:13–20. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jrm.2016.007.01.3.Search in Google Scholar

25. Huda, AA, Sugeng Widodo, A, Siswanto, E. Pengaruh lip thickness turncated nozzle sudut luar TerhadapKarakteristik api difusi concentric jet flow. J Rekayasa Mesin 2019;10:53–64. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jrm.2019.010.01.8.Search in Google Scholar

26. Dally, BB, Fletcher, DF, Masri, AR. Flow and mixing fields of turbulent bluff-body jets and flames. Combust Theor Model 1998;2:193–219. https://doi.org/10.1088/1364-7830/2/2/006.Search in Google Scholar

27. Naren Shankar, R, Thanigaiarasu, S, Rathakrishnan, E. Numerical characterization of lip thickness on subsonic and correctly expanded sonic co-flowing jets. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 2016;59:134–41. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.59.134.Search in Google Scholar

28. Galeazzo, FCC, Zarzalis, N, Werner, K, Valdes, RJ, Habisreuther, P, Donnert, G. Measurement and simulation of turbulent mixing in a jet in crossflow. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2011;133. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002319.Search in Google Scholar

29. Srinivasarao, T, Lovaraju, P, Rathakrishnan, E. Characteristics of Co-flow jets from orifices. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2014;31:141–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2013-0040.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-07-10
Accepted: 2025-02-26
Published Online: 2025-03-13
Published in Print: 2025-08-26

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Simulation and analysis of the over-expanded flow field in asymmetric nozzles with lateral expansion
  3. Design optimization of a fluidic thrust vectoring system based on coanda effect using meta-models
  4. Research on vibration damping of integral squeeze film damper based on fan rotor tester of turbofan
  5. Influence of conical shaft stiffness on the dynamic characteristics of flexible rotor
  6. A novel design methodology for preventing dislocation in the Zig-zag shroud
  7. Numerical study of effect of the casing slot on the tip leakage vortex and vortex cavitation of a fuel pump
  8. Multi-parameter study on array-jets impingement with crossflow temperature effect
  9. Exploration of shock-induced flow dynamics and turbulence-driven combustion optimization in advanced cavity configurations of hydrogen fueled scramjet combustors
  10. A part-load performance analysis method for gas turbines based on the stage by stages model of the power turbine
  11. Effect of lip-thickness on rectangular nozzle co-flowing subsonic jet
  12. Numerical analysis of pollutant formation and exhaust emission in a short annular combustor under part load operation
  13. Analysis of leakage characteristics and structural optimization of two-stage floating ring seal
  14. Hypersonic boundary layer flow at an axisymmetric stagnation point on a blunt body
  15. Numerical simulations of a turbulent lifted hydrogen flame in vitiated coflow with flamelet generated manifold approach
  16. Optimization of labyrinth seal leakage with independently varied tooth parameters using efficient global optimization
  17. Investigations of modified cooling hole injection angle configurations for improved trench film cooling performance
  18. Influence of non-axisymmetric endwall profiling under incoming vortex on the corner separation of a diffusion cascade
  19. Impact of annular ribs in sudden expansion flow conditions to control base pressure
  20. Effect of preheated swirling multi-annular jets on mixing and flow characteristics in various expanded confinements
Downloaded on 26.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2024-0061/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button