Home The influence of the geometry of V-gutter bluff body on transient vortex shedding
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The influence of the geometry of V-gutter bluff body on transient vortex shedding

  • Luckachan K George , Raja Sekar K , Srikrishnan A R and Kannan R EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 9, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study investigates the turbulent flow field downstream of V-gutters using unsteady numerical modelling. An important domain of application of the vortex shedding induced by the V-gutters is the flame stabilization in high speed combustion systems which find extensive applications in aerospace engineering. In view of this, the present study analyses the impact of the V-gutter geometry, as characterized by the included angle, on inducing vortex motion in the wake. Transient simulations are carried out for three values of the semi-span angle, α = 30°, 45° and 60°. Based on the analysis of the saddle point and the vortex shedding frequency, the study shows that an increase in span angle within this range, favours the effectiveness of the method in flame stabilization. Though the simulations are done for cold flow, the dominant mechanism of vortex shedding is adequately addressed in the analysis.


Corresponding author: Kannan R, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore 641112, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Perry, AE, Chong, MS, Lim, TT. The vortex-shedding process behind two-dimensional bluff bodies. J Fluid Mech 1982;116:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112082000378.Search in Google Scholar

2. Mair, WA, Maull, DJ. Bluff bodies and vortex shedding – a report on Euromech 17. J Fluid Mech 1971;45:209–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112071000016.Search in Google Scholar

3. Hunt, JCR. A theory of turbulent flow round two-dimensional bluff bodies. J Fluid Mech 1973;61:625–706. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112073000893.Search in Google Scholar

4. Balachandar, S, Mittal, R, Najjar, FM. Properties of the mean recirculation region in the wakes of two-dimensional bluff bodies. J Fluid Mech 1997;351:167–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112097007179.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kalghatgi, GT. Blow-out stability of gaseous jet diffusion flames. Part I: in still air. Combust Sci Technol 1981;26:233–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208108946964.Search in Google Scholar

6. Pitts, WM. Assessment of theories for the behavior and blowout of lifted turbulent jet diffusion flames. Symp (Int) Combust 1989;22:809–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(89)80090-6.Search in Google Scholar

7. Coats, CM. Coherent structures in combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 1996;22:427–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1285(96)00011-1.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chao, YC, Chang, YL, Wu, CY, Cheng, TS. An experimental investigation of the blowout process of a jet flame. Proc Combust Inst 2000;28:335–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80228-3.Search in Google Scholar

9. Chao, YC, Wu, CY, Lee, KY, Li, YH, Chen, RH, Cheng, TS. Effects of dilution on blowout limits of turbulent jet flames. Combust Sci Technol 2004;176:1735–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200490487580.Search in Google Scholar

10. Blanchard, R, Ng, W, Lowe, TK, Vandsburger, U. Simulating bluff-body flame holders: on the use of proper orthogonal decomposition for wake dynamics validation. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2014;136:122603. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027556.Search in Google Scholar

11. Umyshev, DR, Dostiyarov, AM, Tumanov, MY, Wang, Q. Experimental investigation of v-gutter flameholders. Therm Sci 2017;21:1011–19. https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci151209072u.Search in Google Scholar

12. El-Feky, SMS, Penninger, A. A study of flammability lean limit for a bluff body stabilized flame. Period Polytech – Mech Eng 1994;38:33–45.Search in Google Scholar

13. Li, HG, Khare, P, Sung, HG, Yang, V. A large-eddy-simulation study of combustion dynamics of bluff-body stabilized flames. Combust Sci Technol 2016;188:924–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2015.1136296.Search in Google Scholar

14. KM, P, Basidh, N, Suganya, G, Devanathan, D. Experimentation of flame stabilization using half v-gutter made of porous material for afterburner application. In: 29th national of aerospace engineers. Chennai: National Seminar on Aerospace Engineering; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

15. Fan, A, Wan, J, Liu, Y, Pi, B, Yao, H, Liu, W. Effect of bluff body shape on the blow-off limit of hydrogen/air flame in a planar micro-combustor. Appl Therm Eng 2014;62:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.09.010.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lieuwen, T, Shanbhogue, S, Khosla, S, Smith, C. Dynamics of bluff body flames near blowoff. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit; 2007:169 p. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-169.Search in Google Scholar

17. Subramanian, GH, Nagarjun, CV, Kumar, KS, Kumar, BA, Srikanth, V, Srikrishnan, AR. Mixing enhancement using chevron nozzle: studies on free jets and confined jets. Sādhanā 2018;43:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0898-7.Search in Google Scholar

18. Ajith Kumar, R, Joykutty, J, Shaji, RK, Srikrishnan, AR. Vortex suppression through drain port sizing. J Aero Eng 2016;29. 06016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000609.Search in Google Scholar

19. Ajith Kumar, R, Nair, RR, Prabhu, M, Srikrishnan, AR. Vortex formation during draining from cylindrical tanks: effect of drain port eccentricity. J Aero Eng 2017;30. 06017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000731.Search in Google Scholar

20. Prabhu, M, Sreenath, K, Ajith Kumar, R, Jayakumar, JS, Joshy, PJ. Rankine vortex suppression in tanks with conical base: a numerical investigation. J Spacecraft Rockets 2020:1–8.10.2514/1.A34794Search in Google Scholar

21. Yue, L, Yang, M, Liu, B, Zeng, W. Experimental study on the mean flow behind EBMC flameholder. Tuijin Jishu/J Propuls Technol 2003;24:524–7.10.1117/12.509744Search in Google Scholar

22. Zukoski, EE, Marble, FE. The role of wake transition in the process of flame stabilization on bluff bodies. Combust Res Rev 1955:167–80.Search in Google Scholar

23. Prasad, A, Williamson, CH. The instability of the shear layer separating from a bluff body. J Fluid Mech 1997;333:375–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112096004326.Search in Google Scholar

24. Fujii, S, Eguchi, K. A comparison of cold and reacting flows around a bluff-body flame stabilizer. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 1981;103:328–34. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3241741.Search in Google Scholar

25. Longwell, JP, Chenevey, JE, Clark, WW, Frost, EE. Flame stabilization by baffles in a high velocity gas stream. Symp Combust Flame Explosion Phenom 1948;3:40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1062-2896(49)80007-9.Search in Google Scholar

26. King, CR. Experimental investigation of effects of combustion-chamber length and inlet total temperature, total pressure, and velocity on afterburner performance; 1957.Search in Google Scholar

27. Bush, SM, Gutmark, EJ. Reacting and nonreacting flowfields of a V-gutter stabilized flame. AIAA J 2007;45:662–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22655.Search in Google Scholar

28. Foster, JR. Effects of combustion chamber blockage on bluff body flame stabilization [Doctoral dissertation]. California Institute of Technology; 1956.Search in Google Scholar

29. Smith, C, Nickolaus, D, Leach, T, Kiel, B, Garwick, K. LES blowout analysis of premixed flow past V-gutter flame holder. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit; 2007:170 p. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-170.Search in Google Scholar

30. Menter, FR. Zonal two-equation k-ω turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: AIAA paper 1993–2906; 1993.10.2514/6.1993-2906Search in Google Scholar

31. Van Driest, ER. Turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids. J Aeronaut Sci 1951;18:145–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.1895.Search in Google Scholar

32. Langtry, RB, Menter, FR. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes. AIAA J 2009;47:2894–906. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42362.Search in Google Scholar

33. Menter, FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994;32:1598–605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.Search in Google Scholar

34. Briones, AM, Sekar, B. Effect of von Karman vortex shedding on regular and open slit V-gutter stabilized turbulent premixed flames. In: Spring Technical meeting of the Central States Section of the Combustion Institute; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

35. Bruno, L, Fransos, D, Coste, N, Bosco, A. 3D flow around a rectangular cylinder: a computational study. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 2010;98:263–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.10.005.Search in Google Scholar

36. Cai, J, Chng, TL, Tsai, HM. On vortical flows shedding from a bluff body with a wavy trailing edge. Phys Fluids 2008;20: 064102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2931682.Search in Google Scholar

37. Li, HG, Khare, P, Sung, HG, Yang, V. A large-eddy-simulation study of combustion dynamics of bluff-body stabilized flames. Combust Sci Technol 2016;188:924–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2015.1136296.Search in Google Scholar

38. Yang, JT, Tsai, GL. The wake flow structure of an open-slit V gutter. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1992;5:685–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(92)90112-i.Search in Google Scholar

39. Katopodes, N. Viscous fluid flow. Free Surf Flow 2019:324–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815489-2.00005-8.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-26
Accepted: 2021-07-26
Published Online: 2021-08-09
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2021-0030/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button