Home Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Vortex Generator Locations on Film Cooling Performance
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Vortex Generator Locations on Film Cooling Performance

  • Daren Zheng , Xinjun Wang EMAIL logo and Qi Yuan
Published/Copyright: August 13, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Described in this paper is a numerical investigation on the concept for enhancing film cooling performance by placing vortex generator (VG) upstream the film hole. Six film cooling configurations with different VG locations are investigated, including the distances for VG upstream the film hole (Upstream Distances) of 20 mm, 25 mm, and 30 mm and the VG gaps of 0, 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm respectively. The effect of VG locations on film cooling performance were conducted. The film cooling performance is evaluated at the density of 0.97 with the blowing ratio of 1.0. Results obtained show that the twisted flow generated by upstream VG rotates in the opposite direction of kidney vortex, producing an adverse effect on kidney vortex. The enhanced adverse effect could dramatically improve the film cooling performance. Moreover, the intensity of twisted flow is greatly related to the VG locations. The film cooling performance improves with the increasing upstream distances. The film cooling performance improves first and then impairs with increasing VG gaps. In this case, the film cooling performance in the case with gap of 4 mm is superior to those in other cases.

Nomenclature

Cp

static pressure coefficient, (p-p 1)/0.5ρ 1 u 1 2, –

D

diameter of film cooling hole, m

DR

density ratio of coolant to mainstream, ρc /ρm , –

H

VG height, m

L

VG length, m

M

blowing ratios, DR·uc /um , –

p

pressure of the flow, Pa

Tc

coolant temperature, K

Tm

mainstream temperature, K

Tu

mainstream turbulence intensity, –

um

velocity of mainstream, m/s

u1

velocity at mainstream outlet, m/s

W

VG width, m

x

streamwise coordinate along model surface, m

y

spanwise coordinate, m

z

vertical coordinate, m

Greek letter
ρ

density, kg/m3

η

adiabatic cooling effectiveness, (Taw-Tm)/(Tc-Tm ), –

θ

non-dimensional temperature, (T-Tm)/(Tc-Tm ), –

ωZ

vorticity, –

Subscripts
m

mainstream

c

coolant

av

average

aw

adiabatic wall

1

mainstream inlet

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of China Scholarship Council (CSC).

References

1. Fric TF, Roshko A. Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet. J Fluid Mech. 1994;279:1–47.10.1017/S0022112094003800Search in Google Scholar

2. Haven BA, Yamagata DK, Kurosaka M, Yamawaki S, Maya T. Anti-kidney pair of vortices in shaped holes and their influence on film cooling effectiveness. ASME Paper No. 97-GT-045. 1997.10.1115/97-GT-045Search in Google Scholar

3. Hyams DG, Leylek JH. A detailed analysis of film cooling physics: part III—streamwise injection with shaped holes. ASME Paper No. 97-GT-271. 1997.10.1115/97-GT-271Search in Google Scholar

4. Gritsch M, Schulz A, Wittig S. Adiabatic wall effectiveness measurements of film-cooling holes with expanded exits. J Turbomach. 1998;120:549–56.10.1115/97-GT-164Search in Google Scholar

5. Schmidt DL, Sen B, Bogard DG. Film cooling with compound angle holes: adiabatic effectiveness. J Turbomach. 1996;118:807–13.10.1115/94-GT-312Search in Google Scholar

6. Sargison JE, Guo SM, Oldfield ML, Lock GD, Rawlinson AJ. A converging slot-hole film-cooling geometry-part 1: low-speed flat-plate heat transfer and loss. J Turbomach. 2002;124:453–60.10.1115/2001-GT-0126Search in Google Scholar

7. Sargison JE, Guo SM, Oldfield ML, Lock GD, Rawlinson AJ. A converging slot-hole film-cooling geometry: part 2—transonic nozzle guide vane heat transfer and loss. J Turbomach. 2002;124:461–71.10.1115/2001-GT-0127Search in Google Scholar

8. Kusterer K, Bohn D, Sugimoto T, Tanaka R. Double-jet ejection of cooling air for improved film cooling. J Turbomach. 2007;129:809–15.10.1115/GT2006-90854Search in Google Scholar

9. Kusterer K, Tekin N, Bohn D, Sugimoto T, Tanaka R, Kazari M. Experimental and numerical investigations of the NEKOMIMI film cooling technology. ASME Paper No. GT 2012-68400 2012.10.1115/GT2012-68400Search in Google Scholar

10. Shih TI, Na S. Momentum-preserving shaped holes for film cooling. ASME Paper No. GT 2007-27600, 2007.10.1115/GT2007-27600Search in Google Scholar

11. Bunker RS. Film cooling effectiveness due to discrete holes within a transverse surface slot. ASME Paper No. GT 2002-30178. 2002.10.1115/GT2002-30178Search in Google Scholar

12. Lu Y, Dhungel A, Ekkad SV, Bunker RS. Effect of trench width and depth on film cooling from cylindrical holes embedded in trenches. J Turbomach. 2009;131:011003.10.1115/GT2007-27388Search in Google Scholar

13. Rigby DL, Heidmann JD. Improved film cooling effectiveness by placing a vortex generator downstream of each hole. ASME Paper No. GT2008-51361. 2008.10.1115/GT2008-51361Search in Google Scholar

14. Zaman K, Rigby DL, Heidmann JD. Inclined jet in crossflow interacting with a vortex generator. J Propul Power. 2010;26:947.10.2514/1.49742Search in Google Scholar

15. Shinn AF, Vanka SP. Large eddy simulations of film-cooling flows with a micro-ramp vortex generator. J Turbomach. 2013;135:011004.10.1115/IMECE2011-65267Search in Google Scholar

16. Na S, Shih TIP. Increasing adiabatic film-cooling effectiveness by using an upstream ramp. J Heat Transfer. 2007;129:464–71.10.1115/GT2006-91163Search in Google Scholar

17. Barigozzi G, Franchini G, Perdichizzi A. The effect of an upstream ramp on cylindrical and fan-shaped hole film cooling: part I—aerodynamic results. ASME Paper No. GT 2007-27077. 2007.10.1115/GT2007-27077Search in Google Scholar

18. Barigozzi G, Franchini G, Perdichizzi A. The effect of an upstream ramp on cylindrical and fan-shaped hole film cooling: part II—adiabatic effectiveness results. ASME Paper No. GT 2007-27079. 2007.10.1115/GT2007-27079Search in Google Scholar

19. Zheng D, Wang X, Zhang F, Zhou J, Yuan Q. The effect of upstream ramps with different shapes on film cooling efficiency. ASME Paper No. GT2017-63741. 2017.10.1115/GT2017-63741Search in Google Scholar

20. Zheng D, Wang X, Zhang F, Yuan Q. Numerical investigation on the effects of the divided steps on film cooling performance. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;124:652–62.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.019Search in Google Scholar

21. Zhang F, Wang X, Li J. The effects of upstream steps with unevenly spanwise distributed height on rectangular hole film cooling performance. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;102:1209–21.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.07.001Search in Google Scholar

22. Sarkar S, Ranakoti G. Effect of vortex generators on film cooling effectiveness. J Turbomach. 2017;139:061009.10.1115/GTINDIA2015-1392Search in Google Scholar

23. Funazaki K, Nakata R, Kawabata H, Tagawa H, Horiuchi Y. Improvement of flat-plate film cooling performance by double flow control devices: part I–investigations on capability of a base-type device. ASME Paper No. GT2014-25751. 2014.10.1115/GT2014-25751Search in Google Scholar

24. Kawabata H, Funazaki K, Suzuki Y, Tagawa H, Horiuchi Y. Improvement of turbine vane film cooling performance by double flow-control devices. J Turbomach. 2016;138:111005.10.1115/GT2015-44026Search in Google Scholar

25. Hunt JC, Wray AA, Moin P. Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for Turbulence Research Report CTR-S88. 1988:193–208.Search in Google Scholar

26. Sinha AK, Bogard DG, Crawford ME. Film-cooling effectiveness downstream of a single row of holes with variable density ratio. J Turbomach. 1991;113:442–9.10.1115/1.2927894Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-07-14
Accepted: 2019-07-28
Published Online: 2019-08-13
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2019-0024/html
Scroll to top button