Home Rotor Balancing with Turbine Blade Assembly Using Ant Colony Optimization for Aero-Engine Applications
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Rotor Balancing with Turbine Blade Assembly Using Ant Colony Optimization for Aero-Engine Applications

  • Altug Piskin , Himmet Emre Aktas , Ahmet Topal , Onder Turan ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Tolga Baklacioglu
Published/Copyright: December 12, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a novel turbine balancing using Ant Colony Optimization method. Results are compared against well known optimization methods available at open literature. With the new approach, turbine blade set can be separated in to two blade sets as heavy and light blades. This approach makes possible the application of Ant Colony Optimization methodology. ACO methodology is compared with Steepest Descent and Exchange Heuristic methods using nine different initial blade placements. And results are presented. Performance of the three evaluated methods is affected by the initial blade placement. Exchange Heuristics method was quick and provided good results in most of the cases. Ant colony optimization was able find better results than the Steepest Descent method. The approach of separating blades into two sets decreased the solution time of Steepest Descent algorithm. Ant colony optimization method can be used for turbine blade assembly and balancing for aircraft gas turbine applications. This approach is used for the first time in this area and not seen at the open literature.

Nomenclature

B1

Set of position numbers of the heavy blades

B2

Set of position numbers of the light blades

d

Deviation of the center of gravity, m

r

Radius, m

x

position vector of center of gravity for single blade

X

position vector of center of gravity for total weight

w

weight of single blade

W

total weight of system

S

set of blades

Greek Letters
ϴ

Blade position angle, °

Subscripts and superscripts
i

Blade number

References

1. Boynton R, Wiener K, 1995. A new moment balance machine for turbine blade measurement. SAWE Paper No. 2244, 54th conference of Society of Allied Weight Engineers, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

2. Mosevich J. Balancing hydraulic turbine runners-A discrete combinatorial optimization problem. Eur J Oper Res. 1986;26:202–04. Cited 17 times. DOI:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90181-5Search in Google Scholar

3. Laporte G, Mercure H. Balancing hydraulic turbine runners: A quadratic assignment problem. Eur J Oper Res. 1988;35:378–81. ISSN 0377-2217.10.1016/0377-2217(88)90227-5Search in Google Scholar

4. Fathi Y, Ginjupalli KK. A mathematical model and a heuristic procedure for the turbine balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res. 1993;65:336–42. ISSN 0377-2217.10.1016/0377-2217(93)90113-2Search in Google Scholar

5. Sinclair M, Von Backstrom TW, Du Buisson JJ. Heuristic methods for arranging blades to minimize rotor unbalance. Eng Optimization. 1993;22:19–26.10.1080/03052159308941323Search in Google Scholar

6. Von Backström TW, Du Buisson JJ. Blade arrangement strategies for minimal rotor unbalance. Int J Turbo Jet Engines. 1994;11:193–200.10.1515/TJJ.1994.11.2-3.193Search in Google Scholar

7. Mason A, Rönnqvist M, 1994. Solutions methods fort the balancing of jet turbine. ORSNZ-proceedings-1994-34. Department of Engineering Science The University of Auckland.Search in Google Scholar

8. Choi W, Kang H, Baek T. A turbine-blade balancing problem. Int J Prod Econ. 1999;60Ð61:405–10.10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00164-9Search in Google Scholar

9. Choi W, Storerb RH. Heuristic algorithms for a turbine-blade-balancing problem. Comput Oper Res. 2004;31:1245–58.10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00078-9Search in Google Scholar

10. Amiouny SV, Bartholdi III JJ, Vande Vate JH. Heuristic for balancing turbine fans. Oper Res.© 2000 INFORMS 2000;48:591–602.10.1287/opre.48.4.591.12413Search in Google Scholar

11. Pitsoulis LS, Pardalos PM, Hearn DW. Approximate solutions to the turbine balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;130:147–55.10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00029-1Search in Google Scholar

12. Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM. Nonlinear programming: Theory and algorithms, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2006. ISBN:978-0-471-48600-8.10.1002/0471787779Search in Google Scholar

13. Dorigo M, 1992. Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Ph.D.thesis, Politechnico di Milano.Search in Google Scholar

14. Stützle T, Hoos HH. Max-min Ant system. Future Gener Comput Syst. 1999;16:889–914.10.1016/S0167-739X(00)00043-1Search in Google Scholar

15. Rao SS. Engineering optimization, theory and practice, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2009. ISBN: 10 0470183527, ISBN:13 9780470183526.10.1002/9780470549124Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-11-28
Accepted: 2017-12-03
Published Online: 2017-12-12
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2017-0060/html
Scroll to top button