Home Technology Prediction of Lean Blowout Limits for Methane-Air Bluff Body Stabilized Combustion using a Temperature Gradient Method in a Model Gas-Turbine Afterburner
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Prediction of Lean Blowout Limits for Methane-Air Bluff Body Stabilized Combustion using a Temperature Gradient Method in a Model Gas-Turbine Afterburner

  • P. Maran , S. Boopathi EMAIL logo , P. Gowtham and S. Chidambaram
Published/Copyright: September 8, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the present work, LBO limits for methane-air combustion stabilized by a V-Gutter have been predicted by a hybrid method using numerical simulation and empirical relations. The numerical simulations have been carried out to study the stable methane-air combustion and temperature gradients at exit and recirculation region in a model gas turbine afterburner with a planar V-Gutter as a bluff body for four inlet air pressure conditions and three V-Gutter angles. The calculated average exit gas temperature (AEGT) and the average gas temperature in recirculation region have been used for predicting the blowout conditions. An empirical method based on Feature Section Criterion has been used to determine Fuel-Air Ratio (FAR) at blowout conditions very accurately from the numerically calculated average temperature in the central recirculation zone (CRZ).The predicted Fuel-Air Ratio (FAR) at lean blowout conditions has been compared with the experimental results obtained for the same conditions and are found to be in good agreement.

Nomenclature

(A/F)STStoichiometric air fuel ratio
mairMass flow rate of air (kg)
mfuelMass flow rate of fuel (kg)
MWairMolecular Weight of air
MWfuelMolecular Weight of fuel
ΓFeature parameter

References

1 Chaudhuri S, Kostka S, Renfro MW, Cetegen BM. Blowoff dynamics of bluff body stabilized turbulent premixed flames. Combust Flame 2010;157(4):790–802.10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.10.020Search in Google Scholar

2 Dawson JR, Gordon RL, Kariuki J, Mastorakos E, Masri AR, Juddoo M. Visualization of blow-off events in bluff-body stabilized turbulent premixed flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 2011;33:1559–1566.10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.044Search in Google Scholar

3 Rajkumar M, Ganesan V. Analysis of non-reacting flow in an aircraft gas turbine engine afterburner model using finite volume method. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 2003;10:341–352.Search in Google Scholar

4 Ziani L, Chaker A, Chetehouna K, Malek A, Mahmah B. Numerical simulations of non-premixed turbulent combustion of CH4 – H2 mixtures using the PDF approach. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:PP8597–8603.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.104Search in Google Scholar

5 Ganji HB, Ebrahimi R. Numerical estimation of blowout, flashback, and flame position in MIT micro gas turbine chamber. Chem Eng Sci 2013;104:857–867.10.1016/j.ces.2013.09.056Search in Google Scholar

6 Unaune SV, Ganesan V. Analysis of reacting flows in an aero-engine afterburner using computational fluid dynamics. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 2004;11:31–37.Search in Google Scholar

7 Sundaram SS, Babu V. Numerical investigation of combustion instability in a V-Gutter stabilized combustor. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2013;135(12). doi:10.1115/1.4025261.Search in Google Scholar

8 Du Y. Cold-state investigation on a flame holder. JPEE 2013;01(07):45–50.10.4236/jpee.2013.17008Search in Google Scholar

9 Gong F, Huang Y, Huang X. Size effect on the flame base locations after V-Gutters for premixed flames. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2015;82:406–418.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.11.031Search in Google Scholar

10 Mongia HC. Combining Lefebvre’s correlations with combustor CFD. 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 2004:11–14.10.2514/6.2004-3544Search in Google Scholar

11 Hu B, Huang Y, Wang F, Xie F. CFD predictions of LBO limits for aero-engine combustors using fuel iterative approximation. Chin J Aeronaut 2013;26(1):74–84.10.1016/j.cja.2012.12.014Search in Google Scholar

12 Wang H, Jin J. Lean blowout predictions of a non-premixed V-Gutter stabilized flame using a Damkohler number methodology. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2011:6–10.10.1115/GT2011-45958Search in Google Scholar

13 Soroudi MA, Bafekr SH, Timaji M, Rasooli N. Priori calculation of lean blowout limit in an industrial gas turbine combustor. Proceedings of the European Combustion Meeting, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

14 Zheng H, Zhang Z, Li Y, Li Z. Feature-parameter-criterion for predicting lean blowout limit of gas turbine combustor and bluff body burner. Math Probl Eng 2013;1–17.10.1155/2013/939234Search in Google Scholar

15 Zhang Z, Zheng H, Li Z, Li Y, Pan G, Chen X. A new method for numerical prediction of lean blowout in aero-engine combustor. Proceedings of the ASME 2013 Power Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2013.10.1115/POWER2013-98199Search in Google Scholar

16 Versteeg HK, Malalasekara W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. 2nd ed. Pearson, India, 2009:377–380.Search in Google Scholar

17 Turns SR. An introduction to combustion, Concepts and Applications, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, India, 2012:12–22.Search in Google Scholar

18 Boopathi S, Maran P. Effect of air pressure and gutter angle on flame stability and DeZubay number for methane-air combustion. Int J Turbo Jet-Engines 2017;34(1). doi:10.1515/tjj-2016-0018.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-08-07
Accepted: 2017-08-31
Published Online: 2017-09-08
Published in Print: 2020-11-18

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2017-0028/pdf
Scroll to top button