Home Numerical Investigation of Fuel Distribution Effect on Flow and Temperature Field in a Heavy Duty Gas Turbine Combustor
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Numerical Investigation of Fuel Distribution Effect on Flow and Temperature Field in a Heavy Duty Gas Turbine Combustor

  • Xiaowen Deng , Li Xing EMAIL logo , Hong Yin , Feng Tian and Qun Zhang
Published/Copyright: February 15, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Multiple-swirlers structure is commonly adopted for combustion design strategy in heavy duty gas turbine. The multiple-swirlers structure might shorten the flame brush length and reduce emissions. In engineering application, small amount of gas fuel is distributed for non-premixed combustion as a pilot flame while most fuel is supplied to main burner for premixed combustion. The effect of fuel distribution on the flow and temperature field related to the combustor performance is a significant issue. This paper investigates the fuel distribution effect on the combustor performance by adjusting the pilot/main burner fuel percentage. Five pilot fuel distribution schemes are considered including 3 %, 5 %, 7 %, 10 % and 13 %. Altogether five pilot fuel distribution schemes are computed and deliberately examined. The flow field and temperature field are compared, especially on the multiple-swirlers flow field. Computational results show that there is the optimum value for the base load of combustion condition. The pilot fuel percentage curve is calculated to optimize the combustion operation. Under the combustor structure and fuel distribution scheme, the combustion achieves high efficiency with acceptable OTDF and low NOX emission. Besides, the CO emission is also presented.

Funding statement: The research project of China Southern Power Grid Company Ltd, (Grant/Award Number: ‘No.K-GD20140492’) General Financial Grant from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, (Grant/Award Number: ‘2015M570696’).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the project supported by General Financial Grant from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M570696) and the research project of China Southern Power Grid Company Ltd (No.K-GD20140492). Thanks to Dr. Li Debo for beneficial discussions.

Nomenclature

T

Temperature, K

M

Mass flow rate, kg/s

P

Pressure, kPa

TI

Turbulence intensity

H

Combustion efficiency

y+

y plus

Abbreviations
OTDF

Outlet Temperature Distortion Factor

UHC

Unburned Hydro-Carbon

RANS

Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes

LES

Large eddy simulation

Subscripts
F

Fuel

A

Air

O

Outlet

I

Inlet

Max

Maximum

Ave

Average

References

1. Lovett JA, Ahmed K, Bibik O, Smith AG, Lubarsky E, Menon S, et al. On the influence of fuel distribution on the flame structure of bluff-body stabilized flames. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2013;136(4):041503–041503–10.10.1115/GT2013-95997Search in Google Scholar

2. Cross C, Fricker A, Shcherbik D, Lubarsky E, Zinn BT, Lovett J. Dynamics of non-premixed bluff-body stabilized flames in heated air flow. ASME Paper No.GT 2010–23059.10.1115/GT2010-23059Search in Google Scholar

3. Davis LB, Black SH. Dry low NOX combustion systems for GE heavy-duty gas turbines. GE Power Systems, GER-3568G, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

4. Feigl M, Setzer F, Varela RF, Myers G, Sweet B. Field test validation of the DLN 2.5H combustion system on the 9H gas turbine at Balgan bay power station. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2005, ASME paper No.GT2005–68843.10.1115/GT2005-68843Search in Google Scholar

5. Gruschka U, Janus B, Meisl J, Huth M, Wasif S. ULN system for the new SGT5-8000H gas turbine: design and high pressure rig test results. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, 2008, No.GT2008–51208.10.1115/GT2008-51208Search in Google Scholar

6. Kock BF, Prade B, Witzel B, Streb H, Koenig MH. Combustion system update SGT5-4000F- design, testing & validation. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, 2013, ASME paperNo.GT2013–95569.10.1115/GT2013-95569Search in Google Scholar

7. Tanimura S, Nose M, Ishizaka K, Takiguchi S, Rodriguez J. Advanced dry low NOX combustor for Mitsubishi G class gas turbines. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, 2008, ASME paperNo.GT2008–50819.10.1115/GT2008-50819Search in Google Scholar

8. Lazik W, Th D, Bake S, Bank Rvd, Rackwitz L. Development of lean-burn low-NOX combustion technology at Rolls-Royce Deutschland. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2008, ASME paper No.GT2008–51115.10.1115/GT2008-51115Search in Google Scholar

9. Yunoki K, Murota T, Miura K, Okazaki K. Numerical simulation of turbulent combustion flows for coaxial jet cluster burner. Proceedings of ASME 2013 Power Conference, paper No.POWER2013–98143.10.1115/POWER2013-98143Search in Google Scholar

10. Kim JH, Song TW, Kim TS, Ro ST. Model development and simulation of transient behavior of heavy duty gas turbines. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2000;123(3):589–94.10.1115/2000-GT-0548Search in Google Scholar

11. Nijeholt J, Komen E, Verhage A, Beek M. First assessment of biogas co-firing on the GE MS9001FA gas turbine using CFD. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2008, ASME paper No.GT2003–38804.Search in Google Scholar

12. Pourbeik P, Modau F. Model development and field testing of a heavy-duty gas-turbine generator. IEEE Trans Power Systems May 2008;23(2):664–72.10.1109/TPWRS.2008.920198Search in Google Scholar

13. Goldin G, Montanari F, Patil S. A comparison of RANS and LES of an industrial lean premixed burner. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2014, paper No.GT2014–69936.10.1115/GT2014-25352Search in Google Scholar

14. Barhaghi DG, Janczewski J, Larsson T. Experimental and numerical investigation of a combustor model. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011, paper No.GT2011–46331.10.1115/GT2011-46331Search in Google Scholar

15. Lörstad D, Lindholm A, Alin N, Fureby C, Lantz A, Collin R, et al. Experimental and LES investigation of a SGT-800 burner in a combustion rig. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, 2010, ASME paper No.GT2010–22688.10.1115/GT2010-22688Search in Google Scholar

16. Khademi Shamami K, Birouk M. Assessment of the performances of RANS models for simulating swirling flows in a can-combustor. Open Aerospace Eng J 2008;1:8–27.10.2174/1874146000801010008Search in Google Scholar

17. Liu Y, Tang H, Tian Z, Zheng H. CFD simulations of turbulent flows in a Twin Swirl combustor by RANS and hybrid RANS/LES methods. Energy Procedia 2015;66:329–32.10.1016/j.egypro.2015.02.078Search in Google Scholar

18. Joung D, Huh KY. 3D RANS Simulation of turbulent flow and combustion in a 5 MW reverse-flow type gas turbine combustor. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2010;132(11):111504–111504–9.10.1115/1.4000894Search in Google Scholar

19. Sankaran R, Hawkes ER, Chen JH, Lu TF, Law CK. Structure of a spatially developing turbulent lean methane–air Bunsen flame. Proc Combust Inst 2007;31:1291–8.10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.025Search in Google Scholar

20. Zhengyi Hu. The general editorial board of aircraft engine design, the manual of aircraft engine design (vol. 9). Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2000:2.Search in Google Scholar

21. Jiang Bo. Aircraft testing and maintenance practical handbook (vol. 4). Changchun: Jilin Science and Technology Press, 2005:1123.Search in Google Scholar

22. Xu X, Zhou L. Combustion technology manual. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008:994.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-4-5
Accepted: 2016-5-9
Published Online: 2018-2-15
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2016-0021/html
Scroll to top button