Wall Pressure Measurements in a Convergent–Divergent Nozzle with Varying Inlet Asymmetry

References

1. Senthilkumar C, Elangovan S, Rathakrishnan E. Flow characteristics of straight and slanted entry nozzle run by a supersonic stream, SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-2423, 2006. doi:10.4271/2006–01–2423.Search in Google Scholar

2. Fradenburgh EA, Gorton GC, Beke A. Thrust characteristics of a series of convergent-divergent exhaust nozzles at subsonic and supersonic flight speeds, NACA RM E53L23, March 1954.Search in Google Scholar

3. Ashwood PF, Crosse GW. The influence of pressure ratio and divergence angle on the shock position in two-dimensional, over-expanded, convergent-divergent nozzles, A.R.C Technical Report, C. P. No. 327, 1957.Search in Google Scholar

4. Musial NT, Ward JJ. Overexpanded performance of conical nozzles with area ratios of 6 and 9 with and without supersonic external flow, NASA TM X-83, May 1959.Search in Google Scholar

5. Morrisette EL, Goldberg TJ. Turbulent-flow separation criteria for overexpanded supersonic nozzles, NASA TP 1207, 1978, pp. 1–36.Search in Google Scholar

6. Reshotko E, Tucker M. Effect of a discontinuity on turbulent boundary-layer-thickness parameters with application to shock-induced separation, NACA TN 3454, 1955.Search in Google Scholar

7. Frey M, Hagemann G, Status of flow separation prediction in rocket nozzles, AIAA Paper 98–3619, July 1998.10.2514/6.1998-3619Search in Google Scholar

8. Frey M, Hagemann G. Restricted shock separation in rocket nozzles. J Propul Power 2000;16:478–84.10.2514/2.5593Search in Google Scholar

9. Sunley HLG, Ferriman VN. Jet separation in conical nozzles. J R Aeronaut Soc 1964;68:808–17.10.1017/S0368393100081086Search in Google Scholar

10. Senthil Kumar C, Elangovan S, Stanley AJ, Rathakrishnan E. Flow characteristics of convergent-divergent nozzle kept in a supersonic stream, AIAA Paper No. 2005-4381, 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Tucson, Arizona, July 10–13, 2005.10.2514/6.2005-4381Search in Google Scholar

11. Lawrence RA, Weynand EE. Factors affecting flow separation in contoured supersonic nozzles. AIAA J 1968; 6:1159–1160. Paper No. 2005–4381, 41st Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Arizona, USA.10.2514/3.4693Search in Google Scholar

12. Arens M, Spiegler E. Shock-induced boundary layer separation in overexpanded conical exhaust nozzles. AIAA J 1963;1:578–81.10.2514/3.1598Search in Google Scholar

13. Stark RH. Flow separation in rocket nozzles, a simple criteria, AIAA Paper No. 2005–3940, 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 10–13 July 2005, Tucson, Arizona, USA.10.2514/6.2005-3940Search in Google Scholar

14. Romine GL. Nozzle flow separation. AIAA J 1998;36:1618–25.10.2514/2.588Search in Google Scholar

15. Green L. Flow separation in rocket nozzles. J Am Rocket Soc 1953; Vol. 23:34–5.10.2514/8.4536Search in Google Scholar

16. Ashwood PF, Crosse GW. The influence of pressure ratio and divergence angle on the shock position in two dimensional, over-expanded, convergent-divergent nozzles, C P No. 327, ARC Technical Report, 1957.Search in Google Scholar

17. Hagemann G, Alting J, Preclik D. Scalability for rocket nozzle flows based on subscale and full-scale testing. J Propul Power 2003;19:321–31.10.2514/2.6123Search in Google Scholar

18. Schmucker RH. Status of flow separation prediction in liquid propellant rocket nozzles, NASA TM X-64890, Nov. 1974.Search in Google Scholar

19. Grob A, Weiland C. Investigation of shock patterns and separation behavior of several subscale nozzles, AIAA Paper No. 2000–3293, 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 16–19 July 2000, Huntsville, AL.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hunter CA. Experimental investigation of separated nozzle flows. J Propul Power 2004;20:527–32.10.2514/1.4612Search in Google Scholar