Home Medicine Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD 1) A251G Polymorphism
Article Publicly Available

Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD 1) A251G Polymorphism

  • Yavuz Silig EMAIL logo , Ayca Tas , Serap Sahin-Bolukbasi , Gulcin Caglayan and Ismail Sari
Published/Copyright: January 25, 2017

Abstract

Objective

A genetic polymorphism of SOD1 A251G(rs2070424) is in the 3rd intron region of the SOD gene. The aim of this study was to determine the frequencies of the polymorphisms of the SOD1 A251G in a Turkish population, including 494 healthy individuals.

Methods

The 494 Turkish individuals were genotyped for polymorphisms of SOD1 gene. The distribution of SOD1 A251G polymorphisms in this population was examined using a PCR-RFLP method. Genotype and allele frequencies were estimated by counting. Hardy–Weinberg equation between expected and observed genotype distributions was assessed using the X2 test.

Results

In the present study, the distribution of SOD1 A251G polymorphisms in a Turkish population including 494 (females: 278, 56.3% and males: 216, 43.7%) healthy individuals was examined. The mean age of the study population was 38.4±16.6 years (males, 39.8±17.1; females, 37.3±16.1). The observed genotype frequencies of SOD1 A251G were 86.2, 13.4 and 0.4% for AA, AG and GG, respectively.

Conclusions

This study provides basic information about the allele and genotype frequency distributions of polymorphisms in the SOD1 A251G gene studied. These frequencies may be useful parameters as a reference for future studies on genetic basis of various diseases and cancer susceptibility.

Özet

Amaç

SOD1 A251G (rs2070424) genetik polimorfizmi SOD geninin 3. intron bölgesinde lokalizedir. Bu çalışma 494 sağlıklı birey içeren bir Türk popülasyonunda SOD1 A251G polimorfiziminin frekanslarını belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır.

Yöntemler

Bu çalışmada, 494 sağlıklı Türk bireyin SOD1 geninin polimorfizmi genotiplendi. Bu popülasyonda SOD1 A251G polimorfizmin dağılımı bir PCR-RFLP yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Genotip ve alel frekansları sayarak elde edilmiştir. Beklenen ve gözlenen genotip dağılımları arasında Hardy–Weinberg dengesi X2 testi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular

Bu çalışmada, SOD1 genindeki A251G polimorfizmi toplam 494 (females: 278, 56.3% and males: 216, 43.7%) Türk sağlıklı birey incelendi. Çalışma grubunun yaş ortalaması 38.4±16.6 yıl (erkek, 39.8±17.1; kadın, 37.3±16.1) idi. SOD1 gözlenen genotip frekansları sırasıyla AA: % 86.2 AG: % 13.4 ve GG için % 0.4 olarak tespit edildi.

Sonuç

Bu çalışma, Türk toplumunda SOD1 A251G gen polimorfizmlerinin alel ve genotip frekans dağılımları hakkında temel bilgiler sağlamıştır. Türk popülasyonunda SOD1 A251G polimorfizmi ile yapılan ilk çalışmadır ve önemlidir. Bu frekanslar gelecekte çeşitli hastalıklar ve kanser yatkınlığı çalışmalarında yararlı referans parametreler olabilir.

Introduction

Oxidative stress is accepted as one of the main factors involved in the development and progression of many diseases [1], [2]. Many studies have shown the relationship between the genetic polymorphism of SODs genes and multifactorial diseases such as cancers and age-related macular degeneration [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Superoxide dismutases are a class of enzymes that catalyze the dismutation of superoxide into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. They play an important role in the antioxidant mechanism in almost all cells exposed to oxygen [8]. Three isoforms of SOD [cytoplasmic superoxide dismutase (SOD1), mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (SOD2) and extracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD3)] have been identified in mammals [9], [10], [11]. SOD1 accounts for approximately 85% of the total cellular SOD activity of the most mammalian cells [12].

The SOD1 gene is localized in the chromosome 21 (region 21q22) in humans. It contains four introns and five exons. Possible associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms in SOD1 gene in patients with diabetes mellitus, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, encephalitis, and breast cancer have been reported [2], [13], [14]. A genetic polymorphism of A251G (rs2070424) is located in 3rd intron of the SOD1 gene. This polymorphism plays important roles as a risk factor of many diseases, including Alzheimer's disease [15], type 1 diabetic nephropathy [16], in age-related cataract [4], noise-induced hearing loss [17], myelomeningocele [18], antituberculosis drugs-induced hepatitis [19], ulcerative colitis [20] and gastric cancer [21].

This study is the first study of the Turkish population in the SOD1 A251G polymorphism. The aim of this study was to determine the frequencies of SOD1 A251G gene polymorphisms in a Turkish population. Here, we describe a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based method for identifying single nucleotide polymorphism.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The study protocol was approved by both scientific and ethics committees (Cumhuriyet University) and written informed consents were obtained from all participants. In the present study, a total of 494 (females: 278, 56.3%) and males: 216, 43.7%) Turkish healthy individuals were studied. The mean age of study population was 38.4±16.6 year (males, 39.81±17.10; females, 37.32±16.14). Healthy controls were composed of 494 individuals who visited the outpatient department for physical examination, without tumors. All participants in the study gave informed consent, provided a blood sample, and completed a comprehensive epidemiologic questionnaire. A questionnaire given to each control collected information on demographic factors, such as age and sex.

DNA isolation

Two milliliters peripheral blood samples were collected into citrate containing tubes from all subjects. DNA was extracted from whole blood by salting out procedure as soon as the samples reached to laboratory [22].

Genotyping

SOD1 A251G in polymorphism in Turkish population was examined using a MspI-RFLP method. For amplifying this polymorphism, forward primer 5′-AGTACTGTCAACCACTAGCA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCAGTGTGCGGCCAATGATG-3′ were used. PCR reactions contained 1 μL (10 pmol/μL) of each primer, 1 μL dNTPs (1 mmol/L), 3μL of 25 mmol/L MgCI2, 5 μL buffer, 1 Units of Taq DNA polymerase and 37.5 μL sterile deionized water. 50–100 ng DNA in a total volume of 50 μL. PCR conditions were 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 50 s, 63 °C for 50 s, 72 °C for 50 s, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplified products were digested with MspI (MBI Fermentas, Burlington, CA) at 37 °C for 5 h and analyzed with 2% agarose gels. Genotypes were determined for the polymorphism as 570 bp AA; two fragments of 369 and 201 bp GG; and three fragments of 570, 369, and 201 bp AG [4] (Figure 1).

Figure 1: PCR-RFLP patterns of polymorphisms of SOD1 A251G, SOD1 PCR product (570 bp); 2, AA (570 bp); 3, AG (570, 369, 201 bp); 4, GG (369, 201) bp; Marker GeneRuler 100bp Plus DNA Ladder; 3000, 2000, 1500, 1200, 1000, 900, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 200, 100. It contains two reference bands (1000 and 500 bp) for easy orientation.
Figure 1:

PCR-RFLP patterns of polymorphisms of SOD1 A251G, SOD1 PCR product (570 bp); 2, AA (570 bp); 3, AG (570, 369, 201 bp); 4, GG (369, 201) bp; Marker GeneRuler 100bp Plus DNA Ladder; 3000, 2000, 1500, 1200, 1000, 900, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 200, 100. It contains two reference bands (1000 and 500 bp) for easy orientation.

Statistical analysis

For all polymorphisms studied, all statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences Program (SPSS, version 11). Genotype-related odds ratios (ORs), their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and associated p-Values were estimated via unconditional logistic regression. The Chi-square (χ2) was used to compare the gender distribution, test the association between the genotypes and alleles in relation to the controls, and test for deviation of the genotype distribution from Hardy–Weinberg equation (HWE).

Results

In this study, SOD1 A251G single nucleotide polymorphism was determined in human subjects. The distribution of these polymorphisms in Turkish population was examined using a MspI-RFLP method. The principal characteristics of the study population are listed in Table 1. There were no significant differences for sex, age, and ethnicity when compared to the controls. SOD1 A251G, 494 (216 men and 278 women) Turkish individuals were genotyped for polymorphisms of SOD1 gene. The demographic characteristics of the study population are listed in Table 1. The mean age of the study population was 38.41±16.59 years (males, 39.81±17.10; females, 37.32±16.14). Allele and genotype frequencies of the subjects for SOD1 A251G polymorphism in the SOD1 gene are shown in Table 2. The distributions of the SOD1 A251G genotype were in accordance with the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium among the study population (p>0.05). The frequencies of AA, AG and GG genotypes were found to be % 86.2, % 13.4 and % 0.4 respectively in the controls. The frequency distributions of A and G alleles were found to be % 92.9 and % 7.1 respectively in the controls.

Table 1:

Characteristics of the study population.

Healthy individuals
Sample size494
Gender
 Males216 (43.7%)
 Females278 (56.3%)
Age (year)
 Range7–88
  Means±SD38.41±16.59
  Males39.81±17.10
  Females37.32±16.14
Table 2:

Genotype frequencies for SOD1 A251G (rs2070424) polymorphism.

SOD1 A251GSample sizePercentagep-ValuesX2
Allele frequency
A allele91892.90.00160.5
G allele707.1
Genotype frequency
A A42686.20.7430.107
AG6613.4
GG20.4
AG+AA49299.59
Total494
  1. aFor Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (1 degree of freedom p>0.05 if χ2<3.84).

Discussion

Genetic variations in the antioxidant genes coding for the SOD, CAT, and GPX enzymes may lead to decreased or impaired regulation of their enzymatic activity and changed ROS detoxification. Hence, genetic variations among enzymes that protect the cell against ROS may modulate the disease risk [23]. Due to the high interaction opportunity of ROS with genetic material, polymorphisms in genes coding for antioxidant enzymes may play an important role for inter-individual differences in maintaining the human genome’s integrity. Genetic polymorphisms in SOD, CAT, and GPX enzymes have been suggested to involve in the tendency to cancer and other diseases [24], [25], [26]. SOD1 plays important roles in diseases like heart failure [27], cancer [28], diabetes [25], Down’s syndrome [29], and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [30]. In fact, the first paper about Down’s syndrome was published in 1984 [31], and the first paper on SOD1 gene mutations associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were described in 1993 [30]. These possible significant genetic variants related to the oxidative stress have already been studied extensively, including SNP A251G of the SOD1 gene. SOD1 A251G polymorphisms are the most common and important of antioxidant enzymes. Most of these polymorphisms result in changes either in the level or in the activity of this enzyme, which can lead to reduced protection against oxidative stress [23], [24], [25], [26]. Our study aimed to determine the allelic and genotypic frequency distribution of polymorphisms of A251G in the SOD1 gene and to compare findings with other ethnic groups. The frequencies of A and G alleles were 92.9% and 7.1% respectively, and the frequencies of the AA, AG and GG genotypes were 86.2%, 13.4%, and 0.4% respectively in the study population. The distribution of three genotypes fitted the Hardy–Weinberg equation (χ2=0.107, p=0.743) (Table 2). There is wide range variation of AA genotype frequency ranging from 23.4% [17] to as high as 88.3% [6] (Table 3). AA genotype frequency was found to be 86.2% in the present study in which the sample size was much larger than those of other studies performed in Turkish population which is very important for the making of more precise estimations in epidemiological studies in a such population.

Table 3:

Distribution of polymorphisms of SOD1 A251G (rs2070424) genotype frequencies in different populations.

CountryYearSample sizeSOD1 A251G (%)References
AAAGGG
China2007136987.312.40.3[3]
USA200846988.311.70.0[6]
China201020123.441.834.8[17]
China201138644.841.513.7[4]
Korea201230030.343.026.7[32]
Iran201424183.915.60.41[33]
Iran201411281.317.80.9[34]
Polond201436877.721.50.8[15]
India201510084.014.02.0[35]
Turkey201649486.213.40.4This study

SOD1 is an intracellular enzyme that primarily protects cells against cytosolic-generated superoxide [36]. SOD1 was found to have a widespread distribution in a variety of cells [37]. The expression of cytoplasmic SOD1 is stable and its activity is often considered as an internal control for SOD1 gene expression. SOD1 A251G polymorphisms result in changes in the levels or the activities of SOD1 enzyme, which can lead to reduced protection against oxidative stress [23], [24], [25]. In the present study, A allele frequency was found more than G allele frequency (χ2=60.5, p=0.001) (Table 2). This finding could suggest that SOD1 A251G polymorphism in Turkish population may pose a risk for some diseases such as cancer. Several studies have reported that the A allele of SOD1 contributed to a high risk of cancer in various populations [21].

In this study, we compared the distribution of three genotypes in different ethnic groups of the world in Table 3. Data presented here show that the Turkish population has the similar GG genotype frequency as seen in Chinese [3], Iranian [33], and Polish populations [15]. We detected higher GG genotype frequency than those found in American populations [6] and fairly lower frequencies than those found in Chinese [4], [17], Korean [32], Indian [35], Iranian [34] populations. Eventually, GG genotype frequency in populations of the eastern countries have been found higher (between 0.3 and 34.8%) than the western countries (between 0.0 and 0.82%) (Table 3). GG genotype frequency found in the present study was consistent with the above mentioned situation that the frequency value (0.4%) was between the values of eastern and western populations. Geographical situation confirms this result.

This study provides basic information about the allele and genotype frequency distributions of polymorphisms of A251G in the SOD1 gene studied. Our sample size was much larger than those of other studies, which is very important for the making of more precise estimations in epidemiological studies. The results of the present study, in conjunction with the results regarding SOD1 polymorphisms in a Turkish population, provide a framework for further studies concerning the role of this enzyme as a susceptibility of many diseases, including certain cancers.

  1. Conflict of interest: There are no conflicts of interest among the authors.

References

1. Rahman T, Hosen I, Islam MT, Shekhar HU. Oxidative stress and human health. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 2012;3:997–1019.10.4236/abb.2012.327123Search in Google Scholar

2. Miao L, St Clair DK. Regulation of superoxide dismutase genes: implications in disease. Free Radic Biol Med 2009;47:344–56.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.05.018Search in Google Scholar

3. Kang D, Lee KM, Park SK, Berndt SI, Peters U, Reding D, et al. Functional variant of manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2 V16A) polymorphism is associated with prostate cancer risk in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:1581–6.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0160Search in Google Scholar

4. Zhang Y, Zhang L, Sun D, Li Z, Wang L, Liu P. Genetic polymorphisms of superoxide dismutases, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase in age-related cataract. Mol Vis 2011;17:2325–32.Search in Google Scholar

5. Tiwari AK, Prasad P, B K T, Kumar KM, Ammini AC, Gupta A, et al. Oxidative stress pathway genes and chronic renal insufficiency in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2009;23:102–11.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.10.003Search in Google Scholar

6. Rajaraman P, Hutchinson A, Rothman N, Black PM, Fine HA, Loeffler JS, et al. Oxidative response gene polymorphisms and risk of adult brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2008;10:709–15.10.1215/15228517-2008-037Search in Google Scholar

7. Ahn J, Gammon MD, Santella RM, Gaudet MM, Britton JA, Teitelbaum SL, et al. Associations between breast cancer risk and the catalase genotype, fruit and vegetable consumption, and supplement use. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:943–52.10.1093/aje/kwi306Search in Google Scholar

8. Fridovich I. Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases. Annu. Rev. Biochem 1995;64:97–112.10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000525Search in Google Scholar

9. McCord JM. Oxygen-derived free radicals. New Horiz 1993;1:70–6.Search in Google Scholar

10. Fridovich I. Superoxide anion radical (O2-.), superoxide dismutases, and relatedmatters. J Biol Chem 1997;272:18515–17.10.1074/jbc.272.30.18515Search in Google Scholar

11. Culotta VC. Superoxide dismutase, oxidative stress, and cell metabolism. Curr Top Cell Regul 2000;36:117–32.10.1016/S0070-2137(01)80005-4Search in Google Scholar

12. Marklund SL. Extracellular superoxide dismutase and other superoxide dismutase isoenzymes in tissues from nine mammalian species. Biochem J 1984;222:649–55.10.1042/bj2220649Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Grune T. Oxidants and antioxidant defense systems. The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

14. Carlsson PI, Van Laer L, Borg E, Bondeson ML, Thys M, Fransen E, et al. The influence of genetic variation in oxidative stress genes on human noise susceptibility. Hear Res 2005;202:87–96.10.1016/j.heares.2004.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Spisak K, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A, Pera J, Dziedzic T, Golenia A, Slowik A. rs2070424 of the SOD1 gene is associated with risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuorologial Neurochirurgia Poska 2014;48:342–5.10.1016/j.pjnns.2014.09.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Mohammedi K, Maimaitiming S, Emery N, Bellili-Muñoz N, Roussel R, Fumeron F, et al. Allelic variations in superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) gene are associated with increased risk of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic subjects. Mol Genet Metab 2011;104:654–60.10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Liu YM, Li XD, Guo X, Liu B, Lin AH, Rao SQ. Association between polymorphisms in SOD1 and noise-induced hearing loss in Chinese workers. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:477–86.10.3109/00016480903253587Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Kase BA, Northrup H, Morrison AC, Davidson CM, Goiffon AM, Fletcher JM, et al. Association of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1) and manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) genes with nonsyndromic myelomeningocele. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012;94:762–9.10.1002/bdra.23065Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee JH, Lee BH, Yoon HJ, Shin DH, et al. Superoxide dismutase gene (SOD1, SOD2, and SOD3) polymorphisms and antituberculosis drug-induced hepatitis. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2015;7:88–91.10.4168/aair.2015.7.1.88Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. El-Kheshen G, Moeini M, Saadat M. Susceptibility to ulcerative colitis and genetic polymorphisms of A251G SOD1 and C-262TCAT. J Med Biochem 2016;35:1–4.10.1515/jomb-2016-0002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Yi JF, Li YM, Liu T, He WT, Li X, Zhou WC, et al. Mn-SOD and CuZn-SOD polymorphisms and interactions with risk factors in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:4738–46.10.3748/wjg.v16.i37.4738Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:1215.10.1093/nar/16.3.1215Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Forsberg L, Faire U, Morgenstern R. Oxidative stress, human genetic variation, and disease. Arch Biochem Biophys 2001;389:84–93.10.1006/abbi.2001.2295Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Tang H, Dong X, Day RS, Hassan MM, Li D. Antioxidant genes, diabetes and dietary antioxidants in association with risk of pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis 2010;31:607–13.10.1093/carcin/bgp310Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Flekac M, Skrha J, Hilgertova J, Lacinova Z, Jarolimkova M. Gene polymorphisms of superoxide dismutases and catalase in diabetes mellitus. BMC Med Genet 2008;9:30.10.1186/1471-2350-9-30Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Cebrian A, Pharoah PD, Ahmed S, Smith PL, Luccarini C, Luben R, et al. Tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in antioxidant defense enzymes and susceptibility to breast cancer. Cancer Res 2006;66:1225–33.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1857Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Alameddine FM, Zafari AM. Genetic polymorphisms and oxidative stress in heart failure. Congestive Heart Failure 2002;3:157–72.10.1111/j.1527-5299.2002.00719.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Oberley LW, Buettner GR. Role of superoxide dismutase in cancer: a review. Cancer Res 1979;39:1141–9.Search in Google Scholar

29. De la Torre R, Casado A, L’opez-Fern’andez E, Carrascosa D, Ram’ırez V, S’aez J. Overexpression of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase in trisomy 21. Experientia 1996;52:871–3.10.1007/BF01938872Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, Figlewicz DA, Sapp P, Hentati A, et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 1993;362:59–62.10.1038/362059a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Ohno H, Iizuka S, Kondo T. The levels of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and carbonic anhydrase in erythrocytes of patients with down’s syndrome. Klinische Wochenschrift 1984;62:287–8.10.1007/BF01721891Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Han L, Lee SW, Yoon JH, Park YG, Choi YJ, Nam SW. Association of SOD1 and SOD2 single nucleotide polymorphisms with susceptibility to gastric cancer in a Korean population. APMIS 2012;121:246–56.10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02963.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Ebrahimpour S. Saadat I. Association of CAT C-262T and SOD1 A251G single nucleotide polymorphisms susceptible to gastric cancer. Mol Biol Res Commun 2014;3:223–9.Search in Google Scholar

34. Yousefnia S. Association between genetic polymorphism of catalase (CAT) C-262T, Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) A251G and risk of age-related macular degeneration. Mol Biochem Diagn 2014;1:77–88.Search in Google Scholar

35. Haldar SR, Chakrabarty A, Chowdhury S, Haldar A, Sengupta S, Bhattacharyya M. Oxidative stress-related genes in type 2 diabetes: association analysis and their clinical impact. Biochem Genet 2015;53:93–119.10.1007/s10528-015-9675-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Monari M, Trinchero A, Calabrese C, Cattani O, Serrazanetti GP, Foschi J, et al. Superoxide dismutase in gastric adenocarcinoma: is it a clinical biomarker in the development of cancer? Biomarkers 2006;11:574–84.10.1080/13547500600899134Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Crapo JD, Oury TD, Rabouille C, Slot JW, Chang LY. Copper, zinc superoxide dismutase is primarily a cytosolic protein in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:10405–9.10.1073/pnas.89.21.10405Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2016-01-13
Accepted: 2016-08-04
Published Online: 2017-01-25
Published in Print: 2017-04-01

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2016-0261/html
Scroll to top button