Home Law Constitutionalism vs. democracy: Four readings. In defense of a “conversation among equals”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Constitutionalism vs. democracy: Four readings. In defense of a “conversation among equals”

Published/Copyright: February 21, 2026
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The tense relationship between constitutionalism and democracy has been a frequent topic of discussion among academics and politicians. In this Article, I present and critically discuss four different, contemporary approaches to this conflictive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy. I shall call these four different responses: (i) against democracy; (ii) for constitutionalism (or “for constitutional restoration”); (iii) against constitutionalism; and (iv) for democracy (or “for democratic restoration”). In particular, I give some reasons in favor of (some version of) the latter position (“for democracy”), which I identify with the idea of a “conversation among equals.”


* Roberto Gargarella, Senior Researcher CONICET (Argentina); Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Project funded by the European Union (ERC, Project 101096176 - ICDD). The views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.


Published Online: 2026-02-21
Published in Print: 2025-09-25

© 2025 by Theoretical Inquiries in Law

Downloaded on 22.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/til-2025-0024/html
Scroll to top button