Home Sizing Up Categories
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sizing Up Categories

  • Lee Anne Fennell
Published/Copyright: July 3, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Categories intentionally create discontinuities. By breaking the world up into cognizable chunks, they simplify the information environment. But the signals they provide may be inaccurate or scrambled by strategic behavior. This Article considers how law might approach the problem of optimal categorization, given the role of categories in managing and transmitting information. It proceeds from the observation that high categorization costs can be addressed through two opposite strategies—making classifications more fine-grained (splitting), and making classifications more encompassing (lumping). Although continuizing and other forms of splitting offer intuitive answers to inaccurate classification and gaming along category lines, lumping is sometimes a better solution. If category membership carries multiple and offsetting implications, the incentive to manipulate the classification system is dampened. To take a simple example, insurance that covers only one risk is more vulnerable to adverse selection than is an insurance arrangement that covers two inversely correlated risks. Making categories larger, more durable, and more heterogeneous can produce such offsets. These and other forms of bundling can arrest damaging instabilities in categorization.


* Max Pam Professor, University of Chicago Law School. I am grateful to Ronen Avraham, Emily Buss, Travis Crum, Hanoch Dagan, Daniel Hemel, Shi-Ling Hsu, Eric Kades, Leo Katz, Adam Kolber, Saul Levmore, Jake Linford, Jonathan Masur, Richard McAdams, Martha Nussbaum, Erin O’Hara O’Connor, Omer Peled, Robert Pollak, Eric Posner, Erin Ryan, Mark Spottswood, and participants in the Legal Discontinuity conference at Tel Aviv University and in faculty workshops at Florida State University College of Law, the University of Chicago Law School, and Washington University School of Law for helpful comments and questions. I also thank the Harold J. Green Faculty Fund and the SNR Denton Fund for research support. Cite as: Lee Anne Fennell, Sizing Up Categories, 22 THEORETICAL INQUIRIES L. 1 (2021).


Published Online: 2021-07-03
Published in Print: 2021-01-27

© 2021 by Theoretical Inquiries in Law

Downloaded on 26.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/til-2021-0002/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button