Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
The Paradoxes of Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: Concluding Remarks
-
Eyal Benvenisti
Published/Copyright:
August 11, 2015
Published Online: 2015-8-11
Published in Print: 2015-7-1
© 2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Sovereignty and Natural Law in the Legal Discourse of the Ancien Régime
- Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought
- On Sovereignty, Legitimacy, and Solidarity Or: How Can a Solidaristic Idea of Legitimate Sovereignty Be Justified?
- A Genealogy of State Sovereignty
- Early Modern Sovereignty and Its Limits
- Sovereign Trusteeship and Empire
- Three Grotian Theories of Humanitarian Intervention
- Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples
- The Paradoxes of Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: Concluding Remarks
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Sovereignty and Natural Law in the Legal Discourse of the Ancien Régime
- Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought
- On Sovereignty, Legitimacy, and Solidarity Or: How Can a Solidaristic Idea of Legitimate Sovereignty Be Justified?
- A Genealogy of State Sovereignty
- Early Modern Sovereignty and Its Limits
- Sovereign Trusteeship and Empire
- Three Grotian Theories of Humanitarian Intervention
- Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples
- The Paradoxes of Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: Concluding Remarks