Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement
-
Josep Quer
Published/Copyright:
October 24, 2011
Published Online: 2011-10-24
Published in Print: 2011-October
© 2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages
- Sign language verb agreement and the ontology of morphosyntactic categories
- Very atypical agreement indeed
- Agreement disagreements
- Prospects and challenges for a clitic analysis of (A)SL agreement
- When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement
- A featural approach to verb agreement in signed languages
- What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement?
- Iconic Agreement
- Response to Commentaries: Gesture, Language, and Directionality
Articles in the same Issue
- On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages
- Sign language verb agreement and the ontology of morphosyntactic categories
- Very atypical agreement indeed
- Agreement disagreements
- Prospects and challenges for a clitic analysis of (A)SL agreement
- When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement
- A featural approach to verb agreement in signed languages
- What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement?
- Iconic Agreement
- Response to Commentaries: Gesture, Language, and Directionality
