Home Linguistics & Semiotics How the officials' styles of recording the asylum seekers' statements in reports affect the assessment of applications: the case of Belgian asylum agencies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

How the officials' styles of recording the asylum seekers' statements in reports affect the assessment of applications: the case of Belgian asylum agencies

  • Isabel Gómez Díez EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 30, 2011
Text & Talk
From the journal Volume 31 Issue 5

Abstract

This paper aims at describing the styles of asylum officials when eliciting asylum seekers' narratives of persecution and recording them in the report of the hearing. In order to illustrate the effect of these styles on the assessment of the applicant's request, I analyze the recordings of first-stage hearings, their corresponding records, and the asylum agency's decisions, which I gathered during fieldwork in the Belgian asylum agencies between 2004 and 2007. I distinguish in my corpus two different styles of officials interacting with applicants: “narrative” and “elicitative.” The two styles are associated with two different techniques of drafting the reports, i.e., “simultaneous” and “mediated.” The analysis of my data reveals that officials employing an “elicitative-mediated style” delete assessment-relevant elements of the applicant's oral narrative of the persecution.


Address for correspondence: Faculté de Philosophie et lettres de l'UCL (bureau c.472), Place Blaise Pascal, 1, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Published Online: 2011-08-30
Published in Print: 2011-September

© 2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text.2011.027/pdf
Scroll to top button