Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Where the simplest systematics fits: A response to Michael Lynch’s ‘The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis’
Published/Copyright:
November 12, 2009
Published Online: 2009-11-12
Published in Print: 2000-12-01
Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Negotiating validity claims in political interviews
- Thematic organization in parallel texts: Same and different methods of development
- Beyond shopping: Constructing the Sydney Olympics in three-dimensional text
- The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis
- Where the simplest systematics fits: A response to Michael Lynch’s ‘The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis’
- Response to Wes Sharrock
- Who is Cindy? Aspects of identity work in a teacher–parent–pupil talk at a special school
- Youth speech, youth identities, and music worlds in Sweden: Four high-school girls describe music
- Index of articles in Volume 20
- Alphabetical index of authors and articles in TEXT, 1990-2000
- Chronological index of contents in TEXT, 1990-2000
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Negotiating validity claims in political interviews
- Thematic organization in parallel texts: Same and different methods of development
- Beyond shopping: Constructing the Sydney Olympics in three-dimensional text
- The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis
- Where the simplest systematics fits: A response to Michael Lynch’s ‘The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis’
- Response to Wes Sharrock
- Who is Cindy? Aspects of identity work in a teacher–parent–pupil talk at a special school
- Youth speech, youth identities, and music worlds in Sweden: Four high-school girls describe music
- Index of articles in Volume 20
- Alphabetical index of authors and articles in TEXT, 1990-2000
- Chronological index of contents in TEXT, 1990-2000
