Towards a new typology of the referential information structure of specificational it-clefts

References

Bourgoin, Charlotte, Gerard O’Grady & Kristin Davidse. 2021. Managing information flow through prosody in it-clefts. English Language & Linguistics 25(3). 485–511. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674321000216.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–56. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.11.03chaSearch in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Susan E. Haviland. 1977. Comprehension and the Given-New contract. In Roy Freedle (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension, 1–40. Norwood: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Peter. 1991. Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Peter. 2006. It-clefts and wh-clefts: Prosody and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10). 1706–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.015.Search in Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat. 1983. Predicational clefts. Lingua 61(1). 9–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90023-2.Search in Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat. 1984. The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua 64. 251–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(84)90065-2.Search in Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat. 1988. Studies on copular sentences, cleſts and pseudo-clefts. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110869330Search in Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat & Shigeki Seki. 1990. Premodified reduced IT-clefts. Lingua 82(1). 15–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(90)90054-o.Search in Google Scholar

Delin, Judy & Jon Oberlander. 1995. Syntactic constraints on discourse structure: The case of it-clefts. Linguistics 33(3). 465–500. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.3.465.Search in Google Scholar

Doetjes, Jenny, Georges Rebuschi & Annie Rialland. 2004. Cleft sentences. In Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 529–552. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Dufter, Andreas. 2009. Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance. In Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds.), Focus and background in Romance languages, 83–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.112.05dufSearch in Google Scholar

Emmott, Catherine. 1992. Splitting the referent: An introduction to narrative enactors. In Martin Davies & Louise J. Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 221–228. London: Harold Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Garassino, Davide. 2014. Clefts sentences. Italian-English in contrast. In Anna-Maria De Cesare (ed.), Frequency, forms and functions of cleft constructions in Romance and Germanic, 101–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110361872.101Search in Google Scholar

Geluykens, Ronald. 1988. Five types of clefting in English discourse. Linguistics 26. 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1988.26.5.823.Search in Google Scholar

Gentens, Caroline. 2016. The discursive status of extraposed object clauses. Journal of Pragmatics 96. 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1975. Focus and the scope of assertion: Some Bantu evidence. Studies in African Linguistics 6(2). 185–206.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.3.01givSearch in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax, 2nd edn., vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn2Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 209–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.17.16gunSearch in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part II. Journal of Linguistics 3. 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700016613.Search in Google Scholar

Hedberg, Nancy. 1990. Discourse pragmatics and cleft sentences in English. University of Minnesota Unpublished PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Stefan. 2006. The complex functions of it-clefts. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus, 549–578. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110922011.549Search in Google Scholar

Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2005. It-extraposition in English: A functional view. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(2). 119–159. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.10.2.02kal.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3). 463–516. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.021.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Jim R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.59Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian. 1992. Interpreting the textual metafunction. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 37–81. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1954. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Part I. Glendale, CA: The Summer Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen. 1978. A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54. 883–906. https://doi.org/10.2307/413238.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1992. Trust the text: The implications are daunting. In Martin Davies & Louise J. Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 5–19. London: Harold Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Svartvik, Jan (ed.). 1990. The London corpus of spoken English: Description and research. Lund Studies in English 82. Lund: Lund University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory, Betty Birner & Rodney Huddleston. 2002. Information packaging. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 1363–1447. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530.017Search in Google Scholar