Pragmatic patterns in Bram Stoker’s Dracula

References

Anthony, Laurence. 2018. AntConc (3.5.7) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.Search in Google Scholar

Arata, Stephen D. 1990. The Occidental tourist: Dracula and the anxiety of reverse colonization. Victorian Studies 33(4). 621–645.Search in Google Scholar

Auerbach, Nina & David J. Skal (eds.). 1997. Bram Stoker. Dracula. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Black, Max. 1967. Induction. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 169–181. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Busa, Roberto. 1990. Informatics and new philology. Computers and the Humanities 24(5/6). 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00186474.Search in Google Scholar

Busa, Roberto. 1992. Half a century of literary computing: Towards a ‘new’ philology. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 17(2/62). 124–133.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves & Martin Warren. 2006. From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4). 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che.Search in Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy. 2002. On the misuse of the notion of “abduction” in linguistics. Journal of Linguistics 38(3). 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222670200169x.Search in Google Scholar

Douven, Igor. 2017. Abduction. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/abduction/.Search in Google Scholar

Ellmann, Maud (ed.). 1996. Dracula. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Christine. 2004. Nonstandard language and the cultural stakes of Stoker’s Dracula. English Literary History 71(1). 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2004.0015.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer-Starcke, Bettina. 2010. Corpus linguistics in literary analysis: Jane Austen and her contemporaries. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley E. 1973. What is stylistics and why are they saying such terrible things about it? In Chatman Seymour (ed.), Approaches to poetics, 109–152. New York: Columbia University Press 1973. https://doi.org/10.7312/chat90384-006.Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher, Alana. 2013. No clocks in his castle: the threat of the durée in Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Victorian Review 39(1). 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/vcr.2013.0009.Search in Google Scholar

Greaves, Chris. 2005. ConcGram 1.0. A phraseological search engine. Amsterdam: Benjamins [Software.].Search in Google Scholar

Hanks, Patrick. 2013. Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Herbert, Christopher. 2002. Vampire religion. Representations 79(1). 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2002.79.1.100.Search in Google Scholar

Hidalgo-Downing, Laura. 2000. Negation in discourse. Language & Literature 9(3). 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700000900302.Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2011. Corpus approaches to evaluation. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203841686Search in Google Scholar

Hustis, Harriet. 2001. Black and white and read all over: performative textuality in Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Studies in the Novel 33(1). 18–33.Search in Google Scholar

Jann, Rosemary. 1989. Saved by science? The mixed messages of Stoker’s Dracula. Texas Studies In Literature And Language 31(2). 273–287.Search in Google Scholar

Jung, Uli. 1997. Dracula : filmanalytische Studien zur Funktionalisierung eines Motivs der viktorianischen Populär-Literatur. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Search in Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. 1992. Computers and the humanities. Ninth British Library Research Lecture. London: The British Library.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1966. English in advertising. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1969. A Linguistic guide to English poetry. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 2007. Style in fiction revisited. Style 41(2). 117–132.10.1053/S0016-5085(07)00962-6Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. & Mick H. Short. 1981. Style in fiction. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. & Mick H. Short. 2007. Style in fiction, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

McGuire, William J. 1999. Constructing social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511571206Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Subjective and objective. In Mortal Questions, 196–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Page, Leanne. 2011. Phonograph, shorthand, typewriter: high performance technologies in Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Victorian Network 3(2). 95–113.Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1968. The logic of scientific discovery, 3rd revised edn.. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1972. Objective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Radick, Caryn. 2013. “Complete and in order”: Bram Stoker’s Dracula and the archival profession. American Archivist 76(2). 502–520. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.wn3964n4r01h7034.Search in Google Scholar

Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 519–549. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Leah. 2009. Mass production and the spread of information in Dracula, 1880-1920. English Literature in Transition 52(4). 440–457. https://doi.org/10.2487/elt.52.4(2009)0047.Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, Elizabeth. 2015. An up-to-date religion: the challenges and constructions of belief in Dracula. Religion and Literature 47(3). 77–98.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1976. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6(2). 319–332.10.2307/468422Search in Google Scholar

Siepmann, Dirk. 2015. A corpus-based investigation into key words and key patterns in post-war fiction. Functions of Language 22(3). 362–399. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.3.03sie.Search in Google Scholar

Stoker, Bram. 1897. Dracula [Revised Penguin Classics edn. 2003, with introduction and notes by Christopher Hindle.]. Westminster: Constable.Search in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 2005. Conrad in the computer: examples of quantitative stylistic methods. Language & Literature 14(1). 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005048873.Search in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael & Isabel Barth. 2003. Using recurrent phrases as text-type discriminators. Functions of Language 10(1). 65–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.1.04stu.Search in Google Scholar

Watt, Ian. 1960. The first paragraph of The Ambassadors: an explication. Essays in Criticism 10. 250–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/eic/x.3.250.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Cedric. 2012. Conradian Eldritch: Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. Conradian 37(2). 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Werth, Paul. 1995. World enough and time. In Verdonk Peter & Weber Jean Jacques (eds.), Twentieth Century Fiction, 181–205. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Wicke, Jennifer. 1992. Vampiric typewriting: Dracula and its media. English Literary History 59(2). 467–493. https://doi.org/10.2307/2873351.Search in Google Scholar

Willis, Martin. 2007. “The invisible giant”, Dracula and disease. Studies in the Novel 39(3). 301–25.Search in Google Scholar