The rhetorical structure of analytical writing: a developmental approach

References

Aparici, Melina & Joan Perera. 2001. Variedad y distribución de los movimientos retóricos en textos expositivos escritos. In Paper presented at the Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada. Madrid: Alcalá de Henares.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth. 2004. Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In Ruth Berman (ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (Trends in language acquisition research 3), 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.3.05berSearch in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2007. Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes 43(2). 79–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336894.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth & Dan I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A cross–linguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Eniko Csomay, James K. Jones & Casey Keck. 2004. A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multidimensional perspective, 53–72. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004333772_005Search in Google Scholar

Britton, Bruce K. 1994. Understanding expository text: Building mental structures to induce insights. In Gernsbacher Morton (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 641–674. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome. 1985. Narrative and paradigmatic modes of thought. In Elliot Eisner (ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing (84th year book of the National Society for the Study of Education), 97–115. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.1177/016146818508600606Search in Google Scholar

Coirier, Pierre & Caroline Golder. 1993. Writing argumentative text: A developmental study of the acquisition of supporting structures. European Journal of Psychology of Education 8(2). 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173160.Search in Google Scholar

Coirier, Pierre, Danièle Coquin, Caroline Golder & Jean-Michel Passerault. 1990. Le traitement cognitif du texte argumentatif: Recherches en production et en compréhension. Archives de Psychologie 58. 315–348.Search in Google Scholar

Coirier, Pierre, Jerry Andriessen & Lucile Chanquoy. 1999. From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing. In Pierre Coirier & Jerry Andriessen (eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing, 1–28. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.5117/9789053563403Search in Google Scholar

Cottrell, Stella. 2011. Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1007/978-0-230-34489-1Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Sydney G. 1986. The effect of audience and mode of discourse on the syntactic complexity of the writing of sixth and tenth graders. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Crammond, Joanna, G. 1998. The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication 15(2). 230–268.10.1177/0741088398015002004Search in Google Scholar

Crowhurst, Marion. 1978. The effect of audience and mode of discourse on the syntactic complexity of written composition at two grade levels. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Educational Researchers Association, London, Ontario, 31 May.Search in Google Scholar

Crowhurst, Marion. 1980. Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels. Canadian Journal of Education 5(1). 6–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1494634.Search in Google Scholar

Crowhurst, Marion. 1990. Teaching and learning the writing of persuasive/argumentative discourse. Canadian Journal of Education 15(4). 348–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495109.Search in Google Scholar

Driver, Rosalind, Paul Newton & Jonathan Osborne. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education 84(3). 287–312.10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-ASearch in Google Scholar

Ennis, Robert, H. 1985. A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership 43. 44–48.Search in Google Scholar

Facione, Peter A. 1990. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

García, Marta & Elisa Rosado. 2013. Elaboración de la información en textos expositivos. Un estudio sobre el español L2 de aprendices arabófonos. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada 13. 343–366.Search in Google Scholar

Heyman, Gail D. & Cristine H. Legare. 2005. Children’s evaluation of sources of information about traits. Developmental Psychology 41(4). 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.636.Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Mellen, Michelle B. Fisher & Robert H. Ennis. 1991. Critical thinking: Literature review and needed research. In Lorna Idol & Beau F. Jones (eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform, 11–40. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Knudson, Ruth E. 1992a. Analysis of argumentative writing at two grade levels. The Journal of Educational Research 85(3). 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9944434.Search in Google Scholar

Knudson, Ruth E. 1992b. The development of written argumentation: An analysis and comparison of argumentative writing at four grade levels. Child Study Journal 22(3). 167–184.Search in Google Scholar

Koenig, Melissa A. & Paul L. Harris. 2005. Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development 76(6). 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Deanna. 1999. A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher 28(2). 16–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x028002016.Search in Google Scholar

Lai, Emily R. 2011. Critical thinking: A literature review. UK: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, Nancy R. 1996. Teaching analytical writing: Help for general education middle school teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic 32(2). 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129603200205.Search in Google Scholar

Lutz, Donna J. & Frank C. Keil. 2002. Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development 73(4). 1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00458.Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James, R. 2009. Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education 20(1). 10–21.10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003Search in Google Scholar

McCann, Thomas M. 1989. Student argumentative writing, knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English 23. 62–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/25143148.Search in Google Scholar

Mochales, Raquel & Marie-Francine Moens. 2009. Argumentation mining: The detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2009), 98–107. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Search in Google Scholar

O’Hare, Liam & Carol McGuinness. 2009. Measuring critical thinking, intelligence and academic performance in psychology undergraduates. The Irish Journal of Psychology 30(3–4). 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2009.10446304.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega de Hocevar, Susana. 2016. Nuestros niños argumentan. Traslaciones 3(6). 47–77.Search in Google Scholar

Perelman, Chaim & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1989. Tratado de la argumentación. La nueva retórica. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Search in Google Scholar

Perera, Joan, Pilar Monné, Mariana Fuentes & Liliana Tolchinsky. 2004. La retórica de los textos expositivos. Paper presented at the IV International Congress on State Language Acquisition, Salamanca, September.Search in Google Scholar

Reilly, Judy S., Elisheva Baruch, Harriet Jisa & Ruth Berman. 2002. Proposition attitudes in written and spoken language. Written Language and Literacy 5(2). 183–218. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.2.04rei.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English for academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tolchinsky, Liliana, Elisa Rosado, Melina Aparici & Joan Perera. 2005. Becoming proficient educated users of language. In Dorit Ravid & Bat-Zeev Hava Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development, 375–388. Boston, MA: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_27Search in Google Scholar

Tolchinsky, Liliana, Melina Aparici & Elisa Rosado. 2017. Escribir para pensar y persuadir. Textos de Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura 76. 14–21.Search in Google Scholar

Toulmin, Stephen E. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Upton, Thomas A. & Mary Ann Cohen. 2009. An approach to corpus–based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies 11(5). 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609341006.Search in Google Scholar

Van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Andrew, Gillian Barnsley, Peter Hanna & Margaret Swan. 1980. Assessing language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Willingham, Daniel T. 2007. Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator 31. 8–19.10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32Search in Google Scholar