Home Linguistics & Semiotics Text from a functional communicative perspective: a linguistic analysis of Chekhov’s humoresque “My ‘her’”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Text from a functional communicative perspective: a linguistic analysis of Chekhov’s humoresque “My ‘her’”

  • Alena F. Kolyaseva

    Alena F. Kolyaseva received her PhD in Russian Language from Lomonosov Moscow State University. Her research interests lie in Russian linguistics, with a focus on functional grammar, text analysis, linguistic worldview, professional communication and terminology.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 1, 2017

Abstract

The article presents a theoretical framework for linguistic analysis of a text – Functional Communicative Grammar (FCG). Based on the assumption that any text is generated by the communicative intentions of the speaker, this approach focuses on the speaker’s time and space perspective in relation to the depicted situation, the plurality of subjects involved and the different statuses of these subjects within an utterance. The methodology allows the analyst to reveal the author’s tactics and strategy in the creation of a text and to point out the linguistic tools that help them achieve the desired effect on the reader. To demonstrate the framework’s potential, I perform a linguistic analysis of a short humoresque by Chekhov, using specific categories developed within FCG. Analyzing the semantics of predicative and non-predicative units, I generalize over the organization of the textual time, subject perspective and registers understood as communicative types of speech, and demonstrate how Chekhov creates the effect of deceived expectation at the linguistic level.

About the author

Alena F. Kolyaseva

Alena F. Kolyaseva received her PhD in Russian Language from Lomonosov Moscow State University. Her research interests lie in Russian linguistics, with a focus on functional grammar, text analysis, linguistic worldview, professional communication and terminology.

Acknowledgments

I’m grateful to Prof. Dr. Kristin Davidse, discussions with whom influenced the final version of this article. I also thank the editors and anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions.

Sources

Chekhov, Anton P. Moya ‘ona’ [My ‘her’]. In Chekhov Anton P. 1974 – 1983. Polnoye sobranie sochinenii i pisem [Complete set of works and letters]. Vol. 4. Rasskazy, yumoreski, 1885 – 1886 [Short stories and humoresques 1885–1886]. Moscow: Nauka. P. 11.Search in Google Scholar

Chekhov, Anton P. 1903. Pismo Alekseevy (Snanislavskomy) C. S. [A letter to Alekseev (Stanislavski)], February 5, 1903, Yalta. In Chekhov Anton P. 1974 – 1983. Polnoye sobranie sochinenii i pisem [Complete set of works and letters]. Vol. 11. Moscow: Nauka. P. 142.Search in Google Scholar

Pushkin, Alexander S. Ona [She]. In Pushkin Alexander S. 1977–1979. Polnoie sobranie sochinenii v 10 tomakh [Complete set of works in 10 volumes]. Vol. 1. Stikhotvoreniya (1813 – 1820) [Poems (1813 – 1820)]. Leningrad: Nauka. P. 236.Search in Google Scholar

Pushkin, Alexander S. 2010. She (translation into English). http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/she-201/ (accessed 28 November 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Pushkin, Alexander S. The Fisherman and the Golden Fish (translated by Irina Zheleznova, 1986), http://russian-crafts.com/tales/golden-fish.html (accessed 28 November 2014)Search in Google Scholar

Pushkin, Alexander S. The Queen of Spades, http://www.stanwardine.com/uwmin/queen_of_spades_chapter2.htm (accessed 25 August 2016).10.4324/9781315706443-16Search in Google Scholar

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1963. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaja literatura.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981 [1937–1938]. Forms of time and chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. In Michael Holquist (ed.) The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (translated by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist), 84–258. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986 [1950–1961]. The problem of the text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences: An experiment in philosophical analysis. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), M.M Bakhtin. Speech genres and other late essays (translated by Vern W. McGee), 103–131. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. 2009 [1985]. Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: Univerity of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bally, Charles. 1932. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: E. Leroux.Search in Google Scholar

Beaugrand De, Robert A. & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. Longman Linguistics Library. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315835839Search in Google Scholar

Beloshapkova, Vera A., Elena A. Bryzgunova, Elena A. Zemskaya & et al. 1989. Sovremennyi Russki Yazyk [Contemporary Russian Language]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1962. Les niveaux de l’analyse linguistique. Preprints of Papers for the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, 491–498. Cambridge, Mass. Reprinted in: H. G. Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 1964, 266–275.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1989. A Typology of English Texts. Linguistics 27. 3–43.10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Vladimir I. 1863–1866. Tolkovy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. St. Petersburg. http://slovardalya.ru/ (accessed30 November 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.). 2016. Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (Cognitive Linguistics Research, 55). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110365467Search in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser (eds.). 2012. Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727Search in Google Scholar

Daneš, Frantisek. 1970. Zur linguistischen Analyse der Textstruktur. Folia Linguistica 4. 72–78.10.1515/flin.1970.4.1-2.72Search in Google Scholar

Dijk Van, Teun A. 1972. Some aspects of text grammars: A study in theoretical linguistics and poetics. The Hague: Mouton & Co. N.V.10.1515/9783110804263Search in Google Scholar

Etkind, Alexander. 1998. Poetika zaglaviy [Poetics of the title]. Revue des études slaves, 70 (3). L’esрасе poétique. En hommage à Efim Etkind, sous la direction de Anita Davidenkoff. 559–565.10.3406/slave.1998.6528Search in Google Scholar

Evgenyeva, A. P. (ed.). 1999. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: V 4-kh t./RAN, In-t lingvistich. issledovaniy [The dictionary of Russian language in 4 volumes/Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow: Russkii yazyk.Search in Google Scholar

Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.). 2013. Systemic functional linguistics: exploring choice. Cambridge – NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139583077Search in Google Scholar

Galperin, Ilia R. 1981. Tekst kak obiekt linguisticheskogo issledovaniya [The text as an object of linguistic analysis]. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. 1972. Discours du récit. In Gérard Genette, Figures III, 67–224. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. 1983. Nouveau discours du récit. Paris: Seuil.10.2307/1772332Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A., K. Christian & M.I.M Matthiessen. 2013. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London – New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203431269Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1974. The place of ‘Functional Sentence Perspective’in the system of linguistic description. In Frantisek Danes (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective, 43–53. Prague: Academia.10.1515/9783111676524Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Peter. 1965. Zur athropologischen Fundierung der Sprache. Symbolae Linguisticae in honorem G. Kuryłowicz. Warszawa: Polska Academie Nauk, 110–119.Search in Google Scholar

Harweg, Roland. 1968. Pronomina und Textkonstitution. Munchen: Fink.Search in Google Scholar

Harweg, Roland. 1972. Weil-haltige Begründungen in Textanfangssätzen. Ein Beitrag zur nichtsubstitutionellen Textologie, in: ORBIS. Bulletin International de Documentation Linguistique. Tome XXI. 5–21.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1978. Functional universals. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 86–95.10.3765/bls.v4i0.2194Search in Google Scholar

Heinemann, Wolfgang. 2000. Aspekte der Textsortendifferenzierung. K. Brinker et al. (eds.). Text- und Gesprächslinguistik, vol. 1. Berlin: de Gruyter, 523–546.Search in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis T. 1953. Prolegomena to a theory of language. (Translated by Francis J. Whitfield.) Indiana University publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, Memoir 7 of the International Journal of American Linguistics, Supplement to Vol. 19, No. 1.) Pp. [iv], 92. Baltimore: Indiana University (under the auspices of Linguistic Society of America [and] American Anthropological Association).Search in Google Scholar

James, Henry. 1884. The art of fiction. In Longman’s Magazine 4 (September 1884). http://virgil.org/dswo/courses/novel/james-fiction.pdf. (accessed 09.09.2016).Search in Google Scholar

Kinneavy, James L. 1980. A theory of discourse. NY: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford – NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lintvelt, Jaap. 1981. Essai de typologie narrative: Le ‘point de vue’. Paris: Corti.10.2307/1772014Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Juri M. 1992. Mozg -tekst – kul’tura – iskusstvennyy intellekt [Brain – text- culture-artificial intelligence]. Lotman, Juri M. Selected works: in 3 volumes. V.1. Tallinn: Alexandra.Search in Google Scholar

Onipenko, Nadezhda K. 1994. Idea subiektnoi perspectivy v russkoi grammatike [The notion of Subject Perspective in Russian Grammar]. In Rusistika segodnya [Russian philology today], 3.Search in Google Scholar

Onipenko, Nadezhda K. 2001. Tri parametra lingvisticheskoy interpretatsii teksta [The three parameters of the linguistic interpretation of the text]. In V.P. Grigor’yev & N.A. Fateyeva, Tekst. Intertekst. Kul’tura: Sbornik dokladov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Text. Intertext. Culture: Proceedings of the International scientific conference (Moscow 4–7 April 2001)]. 9–24. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Search in Google Scholar

Onipenko, Nadezhda K. 2010. Kontseptsiya kommunikativnoy grammatiki i yeye mesto v sovremennoy rusistike. In Elena Koriakowcewa (ed.), Aktualne problemy komparatystyki słowiańskiej: Teoria i metodologia badań lingwistycznych. 203–222. Siedlce: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach.Search in Google Scholar

Onipenko, Nadezhda K. 2012. Lingvisticheskiy analiz teksta i terminologicheskiy apparat sovremennoy grammaticheskoy nauki [Linguistic analysis of the text and the terminological apparatus of the modern grammar science]. In N. A. Gerasimenko et al. (ed.). Ratsional’noye i emotsional’noye v russkom yazyke: Mezhdunarodnyy sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Rational and emotional in Russian language]. 383–389. Moscow: MGOU.Search in Google Scholar

Pouillon, Jean. 1946. Temps et roman. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 1994 [1983]. Narrative fiction. Contemporary poetics. London – NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Siegfried J. 1973. Texttheorie. Munich: Fink.Search in Google Scholar

Sidorova, Marina Y. 2000. Grammaticheskoe edinstvo khudozhestvennogo teksta [Grammatical unity of a feature text]. Doctor of Philology dissertation. Moscow.Search in Google Scholar

Sidorova, Marina Y. 2008. Registrovaya tekhnika i ‘ozhidaniya’ chitatelya: k voprosu o vzaimodeystvii lingvisticheskikh podkhodov pri izuchenii khudozhestvennogo teksta [Register technique and the reader’s ‘expextations’: on interaction of linguistic approaches in the study of the artistic text]. http://www.philol.msu.ru/~sidorova/articles/ (accessed 10.09.2016).Search in Google Scholar

Sidorova, Marina Y. 2011a. Khudozhestvenny tekst kak summa proektsii [Feature text as a sum of projections]. In Tekst. Struktura i Semantika [Text. Structure and semantics]. Vol. 1, 119–129. Moscow: TVT Division.Search in Google Scholar

Sidorova, Marina Y. 2011b. O znacheniyakh termina ‘registr’ v sovremennoy lingvistike [On the meaning of the term ‘register in modern linguistics]. In N.K. Onipenko (ed.). Grammatika i tekst [Grammar and Text] (Voprosy russkogo yazykoznaniya [Questions of Russian linguistics], 14), 442–462. Moscow: Moscow University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sidorova, Marina Y. 2015. Sistema kommunikativnykh registrov i tipologiya kommunikativnykh situatsiy [The system of communicative registers and typology of communicative situations]. In M.V. Pimenova, E.A. Abramova, K.M. Bogrova et al. (eds.) Yazykovyye kategorii i yedinitsy: Sintagmaticheskiy aspekt. Materialy XI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Language category and units: syntagmatic aspect. XI International Scientific Conference (Vladimir, 29 September – 1 October 2015)]. 480–484. Vladimir: Transit-X.Search in Google Scholar

Sidorova, Marina Y. 1997. O sredstvakh formirovaniya kommunikativnykh tipov rechi (reproduktivnyy registr) [On the means of formation of communicative speech types (reproductive register)]. Vestnik MGU. Filologiya, 6. 7–19.Search in Google Scholar

Uspensky, Boris A. 1973 [1970]. A poetics of composition: The structure of the artistic text and typology of a compositional form. Berkeley – LA – London: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Valin Van, Robert D., Jr. 1990. Functionalism, Anaphora and Syntax. Studies in Language 14. 169–219.Search in Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Victor V. 1927. K postroyeniyu teorii poeticheskogo yazykax [The notion of Subject Perspective in Russian Grammar]. In State Institute of the History of Arts (ed.), Vremennik Otdela slovesnykh iskusstv [Annals of the Dept. of Verbal Arts], 3. 5–24. Leningrad: Academia.Search in Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Victor V. 1930. O khudozhestvennoy proze [On the artistic prose]. Moscow – Leningrad: Gos. izd-vo. http://e-heritage.ru/ras/view/publication/general.html?id=46895955 (accessed 2 September 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Victor V. 1936. Stil’ ‘Pikovoy damy’ [The style of The Queen of Spades]. In USSR Academy of Sciences (ed.), Pushkin: Vremennik Pushkinskoy komissii [Annals of Pushkin Committee], 2. 74–147. М.; Л.: Academy of Sciences of the USSSR.Search in Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Victor V. 1959. O yazyke khudozhestvennoy literatury [On the language of literature]. Moscow: Gos. izd-vo khud. lit-ry.Search in Google Scholar

Vinogradov, Victor V. 1971. O teorii khudozhestvennoi rechi [On the theory feature speech]. Moscow: Vyshaya shkola.Search in Google Scholar

Virtanen, Tuija. 2010. Variation across texts and discourses: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on text type and genre. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (eds.), Syntactic variation and genre, 53–84. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226485Search in Google Scholar

Weinrich, Harald. 1966. Linguistik der Lüge. Heidelberg: C.H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Werlich, Egon. 1976. A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Search in Google Scholar

Zolotova, Galina A. 1973. Ocherk funktsionalnogo sintaksisa russkogo yazyka [Outline of the functional syntax of the Russian language]. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Zolotova, Galina A. 1982. Kommunicativnye aspekty russkogo sintaksisa [Communicative aspects of Russian syntax]. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Zolotova, Galina A. 1984. K voprosu o konstitutsionnykh yedinitsakh tekstax [The style of The Queen of Spades]. In N. Y. Shvedova (ed.), Russkiy yazyk. Funktsionirovaniye grammaticheskikh kategoriy. Tekst i kontekst. Vinogradovskiye chteniya [Russian language. The functioning of grammatical categories. Text and context. Vinogradov readings]. 167–170. Moscow.Search in Google Scholar

Zolotova, Galina A. 1986. Opyt lingvisticheskogo analiza teksta [Assay of linguistic analysis of a text]. In: Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom [Russian language abroad]. № 5. 63–68.Search in Google Scholar

Zolotova, Galina A. 2001. K voprosu o strukture tekstov raznogo kommunikativnogo naznacheniya [On the structure of texts of different communicative purposes] In M.L. Remnyova, E.A. Galinskaya & E.V. et al. Klobukov (eds.), Yazykovaya sistema i yeye razvitiye vo vremeni i prostranstve. Sb. statey k yubileyu K. V. Gorshkovoy [Language system and its evolution in time and space. Coll. articles for the anniversary of K.V. Gorshkova], 322–328. Moscow: Moscow State University.Search in Google Scholar

Zolotova, Galina A., Nadezhda K. Onipenko & Marina Y. Sidorova. 2004 [1998]. Kommunikativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Communicative grammar of the Russian Language]. 2nd edn. Moscow: Institut russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-8-1
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2017-0022/html
Scroll to top button