Home Linguistics & Semiotics Disagreement of feminine gender: historical perspectives
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Disagreement of feminine gender: historical perspectives

  • Junichi Toyota EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2012
Text & Talk
From the journal Volume 32 Issue 1

Abstract

In this paper, a particular case of grammatical gender agreement system is discussed, concerning the referent of young females or small children. These referents are grammatically treated as neuter nouns, disregarding their biological sex. This is termed gender disagreement. It is argued here that this is due to the older classification of nouns based on active and inactive distinction, stemming from the active alignment. What decides the distinction is the ability to reproduce, which was once a characteristic of active nouns. This criterion has not been given much attention in analyzing modern languages, but it has been very persistent in spite of various sociocultural factors that forced changes in other parts of grammar. Thus, it can be claimed that gender disagreement is a result of a shift of gender agreement criteria and persistency of a specific criterion, i.e., the ability to reproduce proves to be still an important criterion in gender agreement system in modern languages.


Address for correspondence: Lund University, SOL centrum, Box 201, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden.

Published Online: 2012-January
Published in Print: 2012-January

2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2012-0004/html
Scroll to top button