Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Towards an Oral, Intertextual Neoanalysis
Published/Copyright:
November 20, 2011
Abstract
The aim of this study is to offer a critical reassessment of the progress made in recent years with respect to two of the most fruitful schools of interpretation in Homeric research, i.e. Neoanalysis and Oral Theory. After revisiting a series of theoretical issues, the author presents his personal viewpoint concerning the much-debated question concerning symptomatic or derivative innovation.
Published Online: 2011-11-20
Published in Print: 2011-November
© Walter de Gruyter 2011
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Homer and His Peers: Neoanalysis, Oral Theory, and the Status of Homer
- Towards an Oral, Intertextual Neoanalysis
- Sappho 27 V., Alcaeus 308 Lib., and the Homeric Hymn to Hermes
- Ironic Genre Demarcation: Bacchylides 17 and the Epic Tradition
- Euripides post-modern: “The Alcestis”
- The tradition of the Delian problem and its origins in the Platonic corpus
- Show or Tell? Seneca's and Sarah Kane's Phaedra Plays
- List of Contributors
Articles in the same Issue
- Homer and His Peers: Neoanalysis, Oral Theory, and the Status of Homer
- Towards an Oral, Intertextual Neoanalysis
- Sappho 27 V., Alcaeus 308 Lib., and the Homeric Hymn to Hermes
- Ironic Genre Demarcation: Bacchylides 17 and the Epic Tradition
- Euripides post-modern: “The Alcestis”
- The tradition of the Delian problem and its origins in the Platonic corpus
- Show or Tell? Seneca's and Sarah Kane's Phaedra Plays
- List of Contributors
