Mind Style, Cognitive Stylistics, and Ēthopoiia in Lysias
-
Evert van Emde Boas
Abstract
This paper approaches Lysianic ēthopoiia from the methodological perspective of ‘mind style’, a concept taken from modern stylistics. It is argued that Lysias gave his speakers individualized speaking styles that are indicative of their characters. The narrative of Lysias 1 is used as test case, and the analysis is based on a variety of linguistic features (sentence length, particle usage, pronoun usage) and cognitive concepts (mindblindness, schemas, cognitive metaphor). It is argued that, in a variety of subtle ways, Euphiletus is portrayed linguistically as a simple man, unaware of the motives and actions of others, and as a passive experiencer rather than an active participant in his own story.
Bibliography
Allan, R.J. (2003), The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study in Polysemy, Amsterdam.10.1163/9789004409064Search in Google Scholar
Allan, R.J. (2007), “Sense and Sentence Complexity: Sentence Structure, Sentence Connection and Tense-Aspect as Indicators of Narrative Modes in Thucydides’ Histories”, in: R.J. Allan/M. Buijs (eds.), The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, Leiden, 93–121.10.1163/ej.9789004156548.i-251.41Search in Google Scholar
Allan, R.J. (2009), “Towards a Typology of the Narrative Modes in Ancient Greek: Text Types and Narrative Structure in the Messenger-Speeches of Euripides”, in: S.J. Bakker/G.C. Wakker (eds.), Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Leiden, 93–121.Search in Google Scholar
Allan, R.J. (2013), “History as Presence: Time, Tense and Narrative Modes in Thucydides”, in: A. Tsakmakis/M. Tamiolaki (eds.), Thucydides Between History and Literature, Berlin, 371–390.10.1515/9783110297751.371Search in Google Scholar
Allan, R.J. (2020), “Narrative Immersion: Some Linguistic and Narratological Aspects”, in: J. Grethlein/L. Huitink/A. Tagliabue (eds.), Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, Oxford, 15–35.10.1093/oso/9780198848295.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
de Bakker, M. (2017), “Lysias”, in: K. De Temmerman/E. van Emde Boas (eds.), Characterization in Ancient Greek Literature, Leiden, 409–427.10.1163/9789004356313_024Search in Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1997), Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind, Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Black, E. (1993), “Metaphor, Simile and Cognition in Golding’s The Inheritors”, in: Language and Literature 2.1, 37–48.10.1177/096394709300200103Search in Google Scholar
Bockting, I. (1994), “Mind Style as an Interdisciplinary Approach to Characterisation in Faulkner”, in: Language and Literature 3.3, 157–174.10.1177/096394709400300301Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, I. (1896), Das literarische Porträt der Griechen im fünften und vierten Jahrhundert vor Christi Geburt, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Bruss, K.S. (2013), “Persuasive Ethopoeia in Dionysius’s Lysias”, in: Rhetorica 31.1, 34–57.10.1525/rh.2013.31.1.34Search in Google Scholar
Büchler, O. (1936), Die Unterscheidung der redenden Personen bei Lysias: eine stilistische Untersuchung der Diegesis, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Carawan, E. (2007a), “Introduction: The Speechwriter’s Arts and the Imagined Community”, in: Carawan 2007b, xi-xxiv.Search in Google Scholar
Carawan, E. (ed.) (2007b), The Attic Orators, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Carey, C. (ed.) (1989), Lysias, Selected Speeches, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Carey, C. (2000), “Observers of Speeches and Hearers of Action: The Athenian Orators”, in: O. Taplin (ed.), Literature in the Greek and Roman Worlds: A New Perspective, Oxford, 174–198.10.1093/oso/9780192893031.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2001), Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts, Harlow.Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2002), “A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Characterisation”, in: Semino/Culpeper 2002a, 251–278.10.1075/lal.1.13culSearch in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2009a), “Reflections on a Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Characterisation”, in: J. Vandaele/G. Brône (eds.), Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains, and Gaps, Berlin, 125–159.10.1515/9783110213379.1.125Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2009b), “Keyness: Words, Parts-of-Speech and Semantic Categories in the Character-Talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet”, in: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14, 29–59.10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03culSearch in Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. (2012), The Language of Stories: A Cognitive Approach, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511794414Search in Google Scholar
DeVries, W.L. (1892), Ethopoiia: A Rhetorical Study of the Types of Character in the Orations of Lysias, Baltimore.Search in Google Scholar
Dover, K.J. (1968), Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum, Berkeley.10.1525/9780520378049Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (ed.) (1999), Lysias, Five Speeches: Speeches 1, 12, 19, 22, 30, Bristol.Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, M./Spatharas, D.G. (eds.) (2019), Forensic Narratives in Athenian Courts, London.10.4324/9781315104461Search in Google Scholar
van Emde Boas, E. (2021), “The Linguistic Characterization of Oedipus in OT: A Pragmatics Based Approach to ‘Mind Style’”, in: G. Martin/F. Iuresca/S. Hof/G. Sorrentino (eds.), Pragmatic Approaches to Drama: Studies in Communication on the Ancient Stage, Leiden, 96–120.10.1163/9789004440265_006Search in Google Scholar
Emmott, C. (2002), “‘Split Selves’ in Fiction and in Medical ‘Life Stories’: Cognitive Linguistic Theory and Narrative Practice”, in: Semino/Culpeper 2002a, 153–182.10.1075/lal.1.09emmSearch in Google Scholar
Filonik, J./Griffith-Williams, B./Kucharski, J. (eds.) (2020), The Making of Identities in Athenian Oratory, London.10.4324/9780429277023Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. (2011), Beyond Cognitive Metaphor Theory: Perspectives on Literary Metaphor, London.10.4324/9780203815809Search in Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1977), Linguistics and the Novel, London.Search in Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1986), Linguistic Criticism, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Fusaroli, R./Margagni, S. (eds.) (2013), Conceptual Metaphor Theory: Thirty Years After, Special issue of Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, V 1–2.Search in Google Scholar
Glotova, E. (2014), “The Suffering Minds: Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Characterization in The Child-Who-Was-Tired by Katherine Mansfield and Sleepy by Anton Chekhov”, in: Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4.12, 2445–2454.10.4304/tpls.4.12.2445-2454Search in Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2015), “Social Minds and Narrative Time: Collective Experience in Thucydides and Heliodorus”, in: Narrative 23.2, 123–139.10.1353/nar.2015.0011Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1971), “Linguistic Function and Literary Style: An Inquiry into the Language of William Golding’s The Inheritors”, in: S. Chatman (ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium, New York, 330–368.Search in Google Scholar
Hoover, D.L. (1999), Language and Style in The Inheritors, Lanham.Search in Google Scholar
Hoover, D.L. (2016), “Mind-Style”, in: V. Sotirova (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, London, 325–340.Search in Google Scholar
de Jong, I.J.F. (1991), Narrative in Drama: The Art of the Euripidean Messenger-Speech, Leiden.10.1163/9789004329126Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G./Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G./Turner, M. (2009), More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, G./Short, M. (1981), Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose, London.10.2307/1772012Search in Google Scholar
Leech, G./Short, M. (2007), Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose, 2nd ed., Harlow.Search in Google Scholar
Nischik, R. (1993), “Mind Style Analysis and the Narrative Modes for the Presentation of Consciousness”, in: H. Foltinek/W. Riehle/W. Zacharasiewicz (eds.), Tales and ‘Their Telling Difference’: Festschrift für Franz K. Stanzel, Heidelberg, 93–107.Search in Google Scholar
Nuttall, L. (2018), Mind Style and Cognitive Grammar: Language and Worldview in Speculative Fiction, London.Search in Google Scholar
Pillière, L. (2013), “Mind Style: Deviance from the Norm?”, in: Études de Stylistique Anglaise 4, 67–80.10.4000/esa.1448Search in Google Scholar
Popova, Y. (2002), “The Figure in the Carpet: Discovery or Re-cognition”, in: Semino/Culpeper 2002a, 49–72.10.1075/lal.1.05popSearch in Google Scholar
Porter, J.R. (1997), “Adultery by the Book: Lysias I (On the Murder of Eratosthenes) and Comic Diegesis”, in: Échos du Monde 40, 421–453 (Repr. in Carawan 2007b, 60–89).Search in Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. (2013), “The Imperfect as the Tense of Substitutionary Perception”, in: P. da Cunha Corrêa/M. Martinho/J.M. Macedo/A. Pinheiro Hasegawa (eds.), Hyperboreans: Essays in Greek and Latin Poetry, Philosophy, Rhetoric and Linguistics, São Paulo, 331–375 (Repr. in A. Rijksbaron (2018), Form and Function in Greek Grammar, Leiden, 133–169).10.1163/9789004386129_009Search in Google Scholar
Schirren, T. (2019), “Lysias Ethographos”, in: M. Erler/C. Tornau (eds.), Handbuch Antike Rhetorik, Berlin, 185–214.10.1515/9783110318234-006Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2002), “A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Mind Style in Narrative Fiction”, in: Semino/Culpeper 2002a, 95–122.10.1075/lal.1.07semSearch in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2006a), “Blending and Characters’ Mental Functioning in Virginia Woolf’s Lappin and Lapinova”, in: Language and Literature 15.1, 55–72.10.1177/0963947006060555Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2006b), “Mind Style”, in: E.K. Brown/A. Anderson (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed., Amsterdam, 142–148.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00527-7Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2007), “Mind Style Twenty-Five Years On”, in: Style 41.2, 153–173.Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2011), “Deixis and Fictional Minds”, in: Style 45.3, 418–440.Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2014a), “Pragmatic Failure, Mind Style and Characterisation in Fiction about Autism”, in: Language and Literature 23.2, 141–158.10.1177/0963947014526312Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2014b), “Language, Mind and Autism in Mark Haddon’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time”, in: M. Fludernik/D. Jacob (eds.), Linguistics and Literary Studies: Interfaces, Encounters, Transfers, Berlin, 279–303.10.1515/9783110347500.279Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E./Swindlehurst, K. (1996), “Metaphor and Mind Style in Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”, in: Style 30.1, 143–166.Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E./Culpeper, J. (eds.) (2002a), Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis, Amsterdam.10.1075/lal.1Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E./Culpeper, J. (2002b), “Foreword”, in: Semino/Culpeper 2002a, ix–xvi.10.1075/lal.1.02semSearch in Google Scholar
Serafim, A. (2015), “Making the Audience: Ekphrasis and Rhetorical Strategy in Demosthenes 18 and 19”, in: CQ 65.1, 96–108.10.1017/S0009838814000901Search in Google Scholar
Serafim, A. (2017), Attic Oratory and Performance, London-New York.10.4324/9781315738451Search in Google Scholar
Shen, D. (2010), “Mind-Style”, in: D. Herman/M. Jahn/M.-L. Ryan (eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, London, 311–312.Search in Google Scholar
Todd, S.C. (2007), A Commentary on Lysias: Speeches 1–11, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Trenkner, S. (1960), Le style ‘καί’ dans le récit attique oral, Assen.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, M. (2011), The Literary Mind, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1965), “Individual Characterisation in Lysias”, in: Eranos 63, 99–119.Search in Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1985), “Lysias”, in: M.J. Edwards/S. Usher (eds.), Greek Orators I: Lysias and Antiphon, Warminster, 125–278.Search in Google Scholar
Usher, S./Najock, D. (1982a), “Erratum: A Statistical Study of Authorship in the Corpus Lysiacum”, in: Computers and the Humanities 16.4, 271–271.10.1007/BF02263550Search in Google Scholar
Usher, S./Najock, D. (1982b), “A Statistical Study of Authorship in the Corpus Lysiacum”, in: Computers and the Humanities 16.2, 85–105.10.1007/BF02259738Search in Google Scholar
Vermeule, B. (2010), Why Do We Care About Literary Characters?, Baltimore.10.1353/book.3505Search in Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2019), “As If You Were There: Enargeia and Spatiality in Lysias 1”, in: Edwards/Spatharas 2019, 157–170.10.4324/9781315104461-11Search in Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2019), “Temporal Irony in Athenian Forensic Narrative: Lysias 1 On The Murder of Eratosthenes”, in: Edwards/Spatharas 2019, 171–185.10.4324/9781315104461-12Search in Google Scholar
Zunshine, L. (2006), Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel, Columbus.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- How Style Met the City
- Mind Style, Cognitive Stylistics, and Ēthopoiia in Lysias
- A Civic Style: The Use of μετέχειν Metaphors in Athenian Oratory
- Persuasion by Immersion: The Narratio of Lysias 1, On the Killing of Eratosthenes
- The Mood of Persuasion: Imperatives and Subjunctives in Attic Oratory
- Impersonal Constructions Between Personae and ‘Personlessness’. Strategies of Language Manipulation in Aeschines and Demosthenes
- Some Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Lysias’ Forensic Orations
- Speakers Diffident and Speakers Brash in the Athenian Courts
- List of Contributors
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- How Style Met the City
- Mind Style, Cognitive Stylistics, and Ēthopoiia in Lysias
- A Civic Style: The Use of μετέχειν Metaphors in Athenian Oratory
- Persuasion by Immersion: The Narratio of Lysias 1, On the Killing of Eratosthenes
- The Mood of Persuasion: Imperatives and Subjunctives in Attic Oratory
- Impersonal Constructions Between Personae and ‘Personlessness’. Strategies of Language Manipulation in Aeschines and Demosthenes
- Some Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Lysias’ Forensic Orations
- Speakers Diffident and Speakers Brash in the Athenian Courts
- List of Contributors