Abstract:
This article asks what it takes to make the treatment of a given topic and thus a scientific or scholarly text ‘systematic’. After some remarks upon systems theory, the paper illustrates systematicity, the quality of being systematic, by readings of the Hippocratic On Breaths and De Morbis II, Porphyry’s Introduction to Aristotle’s Categories, and Ps.-Galen’s Medical definitions. Systematicity turns out to be a result of epistemic and rhetorical practices to the same degree. It rests upon the authors’ ambition to transform the epistemic structure of the objects into equivalent rhetorical forms, which, in turn, become convincing because they hint at the objects’ epistemic structures.
Article Note:
This paper originated in a talk given at a Princeton conference in 2013, held in honor of Heinrich von Staden, to whose work and personality this paper is a modest tribute. My heartfelt thanks go to the organizers of that conference, Brooke Holmes and Joshua Katz. Furthermore, I would like to thank Anna-Maria Gasser, Lowell Edmunds, Loren Marsh, Sebastian Luft, and the anonymous readers of Trends for their help with this paper.
Bibliography
Texts citedSearch in Google Scholar
Hippocratic Corpus: ed. É. Littré, Œuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, 10 vol., Paris 1839–61 [repr. Amsterdam 1961 f.].Search in Google Scholar
De Flatibus: ed. J. Jouanna, Hippocrate. Des Vents. De l’Art. Paris 1988.Search in Google Scholar
De Morbis II: ed. J. Jouanna, Hippocrate. Maladies II. Paris 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Galen: ed. C. G. Kühn, Claudii Galeni opera omnia, 20 vol., Leipzig 1821–33 [repr. Hildesheim 1965].Search in Google Scholar
Über die medizinischen Namen ar. & dt. ed. M. Meyerhof & J. Schacht. In: Abhandlungen der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Jg. 1931, phil.-hist. Kl. Nr. 3, Berlin 1931, S. 1–43 dt./1–23 ar.Search in Google Scholar
Rufus von Ephesos: ed. Ch. Daremberg & É. Ruelle, Œuvres de Rufus d’Éphèse, Paris 1879 [Nachdr. Amsterdam 1963].Search in Google Scholar
Porphyry, Introductio ed. A. Busse, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 4.1, Berlin 1887, 1–22.10.1515/9783112332368-003Search in Google Scholar
Works citedSearch in Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2007. Griechische Wissenschaftstexte. Formen, Funktionen, Differenzierungsgeschichten. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2013. “Explanation between Nature and Text: Ancient Commentaries on Science“. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44, 43–50.Search in Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2015. “Peripatetic Forms of Writing. A Systems-Theory Approach”. In: D. Mirhady & O. Hellmann, eds. Phaenias of Eresus. Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick, 407–432.Search in Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2016. “Explicit Knowledge”. In: Hose, M., & D. Schenker, eds. A Companion to Greek Literature. London, 401–414.Search in Google Scholar
Berrey, M. 2014. “Early Empiricism, Therapeutic Motivation, and the Asymmetrical Dispute Between the Hellenistic Medical Sects”. In: Apeiron 47.2, 141–171.10.1515/apeiron-2013-0002Search in Google Scholar
Buldt, B. 1996. “System, axiomatisches”. In: J. Mittelstraß (ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, vol. 4, Stuttgart, 185–188.Search in Google Scholar
Cummins, R. 1996. “Systematicity”. In: The Journal of Philosophy 93.12, 591–614.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, W. A. 2005. “On Begging the Systematicity Question”. In: Journal of Philosophical Research 30, 399–404.Search in Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. 1957. “Galen als Erforscher des menschlichen Pulses. Ein Beitrag zur Selbstdarstellung des Wissenschaftlers”. In: Sitzungsberichte der deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Klasse für Sprache, Literatur und Kunst 1956.3, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Ph.J. 1997. “Towards a Rhetoric of Ancient Scientific Discourse […]”. In: E. J. Bakker (ed.), Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in its Linguistic Contexts. Leiden, 77–129.Search in Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against Method. 3rd ed. 1993, 4th ed., with introd. by I. Hacking, New York, NY: Verso Books, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Fleck, L. 1935. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Basel. Repr. with introd. by L. Schäfer & Th. Schnelle, Frankfurt, M. 1980.Search in Google Scholar
Fodor, J., and Z. Pylyshyn 1988. “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: a Critical Analysis.” In: Cognition 28, 3–71.10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5Search in Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Th. 2008. “Lehrbuch”. In: Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 22, 1025–1034.Search in Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. 1960. Das systematische Lehrbuch. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wissenschaften in der Antike. Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar
Hankinson, J. 1998. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject. The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece. Princeton, NJ: PU Press.10.1515/9781400834884Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 2004. “On the Systematicity of Language and Thought”. In: The Journal of Philosophy 101.3, 111–139.Search in Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1999. Hippocrates. Transl. by M. B. DeBevoise, Baltimore: JHU Press (orig. Paris 1992).Search in Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1954. Heraclitus. The Cosmic Fragments. A Critical Study. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. 1967. “René Chartier. Herausgeber und Fälscher der Werke Galens”. In: Klio 48, 183–198.10.1524/klio.1967.48.jg.183Search in Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. 1973. Untersuchungen zu den pseudogalenischen Definitiones medicae. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Mainberger, S. 2003. Die Kunst des Aufzählens. Elemente zu einer Poetik des Enumerativen. Berlin.10.1515/9783110903430Search in Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1998. Prolegomena Mathematica. From Apollonius of Perga to the Late Neoplatonists […]. Leiden.10.1163/9789004321052Search in Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2004. Ancient Medicine. London.10.4324/9780203490914Search in Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1994. Logik der Forschung. 10th ed., Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Siegwart, G. 1996a. “System”. In: J. Mittelstraß (ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, vol. 4, Stuttgart, 183–185.Search in Google Scholar
Siegwart, G. 1996b. “Systematisch”. In: J. Mittelstraß (ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, vol. 4, Stuttgart, 189–190.Search in Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 2013. “Historical Perspectives On the Systematization of Knowledge”. [orig. 1977] In: Epistemic Merit And Other Essays on Human Knowledge. Frankfurt, 89–114.Search in Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ.Search in Google Scholar
Vallance, J. 1993. “The Medical System of Asclepiades of Bithynia”. In: W. Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Vol. II 37.1, Berlin, 693–727.Search in Google Scholar
Weidmann, H. 1994. Aristoteles. Peri Hermeneias. Übers. & erl., Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
© De Gruyter 2016
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Sight and Seeing in Herodotus
- Herodotus’ Tragic Choruses
- Triumph of Hilarity? Some Reflections on the Structure and Function of the Final Scenes in Aristophanic Comedy
- Archeboule’s Epistomion from Amphipolis
- Remarks on the citations of authors and works in ancient scholarship
- Ancient variants and exegesis for Il. 14.382
- On Systematicity. How to Write (Ancient Greek) Science
- A Musical Note from Roman Cyprus
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Sight and Seeing in Herodotus
- Herodotus’ Tragic Choruses
- Triumph of Hilarity? Some Reflections on the Structure and Function of the Final Scenes in Aristophanic Comedy
- Archeboule’s Epistomion from Amphipolis
- Remarks on the citations of authors and works in ancient scholarship
- Ancient variants and exegesis for Il. 14.382
- On Systematicity. How to Write (Ancient Greek) Science
- A Musical Note from Roman Cyprus