References

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Anastasiadi-Symeonidi, Anna. 1983. La composition en grec moderne d’un point de vue diachronique. Lalies 2. 77–90.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586262Search in Google Scholar

Andreou, Marios. 2014. Headedness in word formation and Lexical Semantics: Evidence from Italiot and Cypriot, PhD dissertation. University of Patras, Greece.10.1163/15699846-01402004Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arvaniti, Amalia. 2007. Greek phonetics. The state of the art. Journal of Greek Linguistics 8. 97–208.10.1075/jgl.8.08arvSearch in Google Scholar

Bağrıaçık, Metin & Angela Ralli. 2013a. NN-sI concatenations in Turkish: Construct-state nominals and phrasal compounds. In Umut Ozge (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th workshop on Altaic formal linguistics, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics #67, 13–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bağrıaçık, Metin & Angela Ralli. 2013b. Bare N(ominal) N(ominal) concatenations in Turkish: Compounds or syntactic fallacies? In Nabil Hathout, Fabio Montermini & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Morphology in Toulouse. Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7, Toulouse, 2–3 December 2010, 35-56. Munich: Lincom Academic Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Compounding. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language universals and language typology, vol.1, 695–707. Berlin & NY: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 1994. Against split morphology. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 27–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_2Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_1Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2005. Compounding and derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology. In Wolfgang Dressler, Franz Rainer, Dieter Kastovsky & Oskar Pfeiffer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations, 109–132. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.264.08booSearch in Google Scholar

Borsley, Robert & Jaklin Kornfilt. 2000. Mixed extended projections. In Robert Borsley (ed.), The Nature and function of syntactic categories (Syntax and semantics, volume 32), 101–131. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/S0092-4563(00)80021-5Search in Google Scholar

Botha, Rudolph P. 1984. Morphological mechanisms. Lexicalist analyses of synthetic compounding. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1997. Mixed categories as head sharing constructions. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG97 conference. Stanford: CSLI, available at http://www.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/2/bresnan-lfg97.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1093/oso/9780198238430.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Samuel A. Mchombo. 1995. The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13. 181–254.10.1007/BF00992782Search in Google Scholar

Dede, Müşerref A. 1978. A syntactic and semantic analysis of Turkish nominal compounds. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

DiSciullo, Anna Maria. 2005. Asymmetry in morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1465.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

DiSciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 1988. Bracketing paradoxes in Turkish nominal compounds. In Sabri Koç (ed.), Studies on Turkish linguistics, 287–298. Ankara: METU Press.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 1993. Levels of representation and argument structure in Turkish. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 2007. Morphology and syntax inside the word: Pronominal participles of headless relative clauses in Turkish. In Geert Booij, Luca Ducceschini, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Online proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting, Fréjus, 15–18 September 2005, 47–72. Available at http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm/mmm-proc/MMM5/MMM5-Proceedings_full.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 2008. Linkers on the edge: Turkish compound marking. Paper presented at the CompNet Congress on Compounding, 6–7 June 2008, University of Bologna, Italy.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 2009. Compounds in Turkish. Lingue e Linguaggio 8(2). 213–36.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. this volume. Phrasal compounds in Turkish: Distinguishing citations from quotations.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı & Belma Haznedar. 2008. Remarks on compounding in Turkish. Ms. Boğaziçi University. Available at http://componet.sslmit.unibo.it/download/remarks/TR.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake. 2004. Turkish. A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203340769Search in Google Scholar

Güneş, Güliz. 2009. On the formation of [V+V] compounds in Turkish. Paper presented at the 2nd Mediterranean graduate students meeting in linguistics, 12–13 March, 2009. Mersin, Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

Hacken, Pius ten. 1994. Defining morphology: A principled approach to determining the boundaries of compounding, derivation, and inflection. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Haig, Geoffrey. 2004. Constraints on morpheme repetition in Turkish? In Kamile Imer & Gurkan Dogan (eds.), Current research in Turkish linguistics, 3–12. Gazimagusa: Eastern Mediterranean University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge. 1988. Parsing nominal compounds in Turkish, morphology as a computational problem. Occasional Papers 7. LA: University of California at LA.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. 2006. Revisiting anaphoric islands. Language 82(1). 114–130.10.1353/lan.2006.0037Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Toru. 1996. The dual status of possessive compounds in Modern Turkish. In Árpád Berta, Bernt Brendemoen & Claus Schönig,(eds.), Symbolae Turcologicae. Studies in honor of Lars Johanson on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 6, 119–129. Istanbul: Swedish research institute in Istanbul, Transaction.Search in Google Scholar

Heusinger, Klaus von & Jaklin Kornfilt. 2005. The case of the direct object in Turkish: Semantics, syntax and morphology. Turkic Languages 9. 3–44.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Orhan Orgun. 1998. Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: Evidence from Turkish. In Steven G.Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari, & Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 360–410. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D. 2002. The word in Modern Greek. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aihkenvald (eds.), Word. A cross-linguistic typology, 243–265. NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486241.011Search in Google Scholar

Kabak, Barış. 2007. Turkish suspended affixation. Linguistics 45(2). 311–347.10.1515/LING.2007.010Search in Google Scholar

Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan & Jaklin Kornfilt (2011): The syntax and prosody of Turkish ‘pre-stressing’ suffixes. In Raffaella Folli & Christiane Ulbrich (eds.), Interfaces in linguistics: New research perspectives, 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kamali, Beste & Didem Ikizoğlu. to appear. Against compound stress in Turkish. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Turkish linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Koliopoulou, Maria. 2013. Τhemata synthesis tis ellinikis ke tis germanikis: Sigkritiki prosengisi [Issues of Modern Greek and German compounding : A contrastive approach]. PhD dissertation. University of Patras. Patras, Greece.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1984. Case marking, agreement, and empty categories in Turkish. PhD dissertation. Harvard University. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1986. The stuttering prohibition and morpheme deletion in Turkish. In Ayhan Aksu-Koç & Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan (eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference in Turkish linguistics, 59–83. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1996. On copular clitic forms in Turkish. In Artemis Alexiadou, Nanna Fuhrhop, Paul Law & Sylvia Löhken (eds.), ZAS Papers in Linguistics 6, 96–114. Berlin: ZAS.10.21248/zaspil.6.1996.762Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997a. Turkish. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315823652Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997b. On some constraints governing free relative clauses in Turkish. In Kamile İmer & N. Engin Uzun (eds.), Proceedings of the VIIIth international conference on Turkish linguistics, 17–24. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1998. Some thoughts on distributing and non-distributing morphemes in Turkish nominalizations. In Joan Bresnan et al. (eds.), Celebration: An electronic festschrift in honor of Noam Chomsky’s 70th birthday. URL: http://cognet.mit.edu/library/books/chomsky/celebration/essays/kornfilt.html, last retrieved: December 16, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2003. Subject case in nominalized clauses. In Uwe Junghanns & Luka Szucsich (eds.), Syntactic structures and morphological information, 129–215. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110904758.129Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2005. Free relatives as light-headed relatives in Turkish. In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing grammar: Studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk (volume 86 of Studies in Generative Grammar), 340–349. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110892994.340Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2012. Revisiting ‘suspended affixation’ and other coordinate mysteries. In Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds.), Functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 7, 181–196. NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin & John Whitman. 2011. Afterword: Nominalizations in syntactic theory. Lingua 121. 1297–1313.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Laks, Lior. 2013. Passive formation in Palestinian and Standard Arabic: Lexical vs. syntactic operations. Word Structure 6. 156–180.10.3366/word.2013.0043Search in Google Scholar

Lapointe, Steven G. 1980. The theory of grammatical agreement, PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1988. Phrasal compounds in English and the morphology-syntax interface. In Diane Brentari, Gary Larson & Lynn Jörg (eds.), CLS 24: Papers from the 24th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, part two: Parasession on agreement in grammatical theory, 398–405. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago & London: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle & Sergio Scalise. 2006. The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. Lingue e Linguaggio 5. 7–32.Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology 17. 233–259.10.1007/s11525-008-9118-1Search in Google Scholar

Montermini, Fabio. 2010. Units in compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.08monSearch in Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina & Angela Ralli. 1994. Stress domains in Greek compounds: A case of morphology-phonology interaction. In Irene Philippaki-Warburton, Katerina Nicolaidis & Maria Sifianou (eds.), Themes in Greek linguistics. Papers from the 1st international conference on Greek linguistics, 201–208. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.117.29nesSearch in Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina & Angela Ralli. 1996. Morphology-phonology interface: Phonological domains in Greek compounds. The Linguistic Review 13. 357–382.10.1515/tlir.1996.13.3-4.357Search in Google Scholar

Nikolou, Kalomoira. 2003. Morfologiki ke fonologiki analysi ton monolektikon sintheton tis Ellinikis [Morphological and phonological analysis of Greek one-word compounds]. MA Thesis. University of Aegean, Rhodes, Greece.Search in Google Scholar

Özsoy, Sumru. 2004. Dışişleri eski bakanı ve Türkçe’nin yeni yapısı. In Zehra Toska (ed.), Kaf Dağı’nın ötesine varmak, Günay Kut Armağanı, Vol. 3, Journal of Turkish Studies, Türklük Bilgisi Araştırmaları 28 (1). Harvard University, 247–256.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 1969. Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society 5. 209–239.Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 1992. Compounds in Modern Greek. Rivista di Linguistica 4(2). 143–173.Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2002. The role of morphology in gender determination: Evidence from Modern Greek. Linguistics 40(3). 519–551.10.1515/ling.2002.022Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2005. Morfologia [Morphology]. Athens: Patakis.Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2007. I sinthesi lekseon: Diaglossiki morfologiki prosengisi [The composition of words: A cross-linguistic morphological approach]. Athens: Patakis.Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2008. Compound markers and parametric variation. Language Typology and Universals (STUF) 61. 19–38.10.1524/stuf.2008.0004Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2010. Compounding versus derivation. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross disciplinary issues in compounding, 57–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.06ralSearch in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2013a. Compounding in Modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4960-3Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2013b. Compounding and its locus of realization: Evidence from Greek and Turkish. Word Structure 6. 181–200.10.3366/word.2013.0044Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela & Athanasios Karasimos. 2009. The bare-stem constraint in Greek compound formation. Gengo Kenkyu 135. 29–48.Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela & Maria Raftopoulou. 1999. I sinthesi os diachroniko fenomeno schimatizmu lekseon [Compounding as a diachronic word-formation process]. Studies in Greek Language 1998. Thessaloniki: Kyriakides, 389–403.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 389–436.10.1162/0024389054396881Search in Google Scholar

Roussou, Anna. 1991. Nominalized clauses in the syntax of Modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 77–100.Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio & Emiliano Guevara. 2005. The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the lexicon. In Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 147–187. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_7Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio & Irene Vogel. 2010. Why compounding? In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross disciplinary issues in compounding, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.02scaSearch in Google Scholar

Schaaik, Gerjan van. 1992. The treatment of Turkish nominal compounds in FG. In Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds.), Layered structure and reference in a functional perspective, 231–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.23.10schSearch in Google Scholar

Schaaik, Gerjan van. 2002. The Noun in Turkish: Its argument structure and the compounding straitjacket. (Turcologica 49). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, Christoph. 1999. The Turkish nominal phrase in spoken discourse. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siloni, Tal. 2012. Reciprocal verbs and symmetry. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30. 261–320.10.1007/s11049-011-9144-2Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 2005. Word formation and syntax. In Pavol Štekauer & Lieber Rochelle (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 73–97. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_4Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2012. The interpretation of phrasal compounds in the model of Parallel Architecture. In Angela Ralli, Geert Booij, Sergio Scalise & Athanasios Karasimos (eds.), Morphology and the architecture of grammar: Online proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, 14–17 September, 2011, Cagliari, Italy, 322–346. Available at http://lmgd.philology.upatras.gr/en/research/downloads/MMM8_Proceedings.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Wiese, Richard. 1996. Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 183–193.Search in Google Scholar

Yükseker, Hitay. 1998. Possessive constructions in Turkish. In Lars Johanson (ed.), in cooperation with Éva Ágnes Ćsató, Vanessa Locke, Astrid Menz & Dorothea Winterling, The Mainz meeting. Proceedings of the VIIth international conference of Turkish linguistics (Turcologica 32), 458–477. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar