(Inter)subjectivity in interaction: Investigating (inter)subjective meanings in Yurakaré conversational data
-
Sonja Gipper
Abstract
This paper investigates the interactional uses of the two Yurakaré (isolate, central Bolivia) epistemic modal markers and =ya ‘intersubjective’ and =laba ‘subjective’. While subjective =laba indicates a personal epistemic judgment of the speaker, intersubjective =ya conveys that the speaker expects the addressee to share the expressed epistemic judgment. The distributions of the two markers in interaction are argued to reflect their (inter)subjective meaning components. This demonstrates that conversational data provide important clues for investigating (inter)subjective meanings in language.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the speakers of Yurakaré for kindly participating in the collection of the data on which the present analysis is based. Thanks also to Katja Hannß, Lila San Roque, Henrik Bergqvist, and an anonymous reviewer for their inspiring comments on earlier versions of this paper, to Jeremías Ballivián and his team for the transcriptions of the data, to Rik van Gijn and Vincent Hirtzel for many insightful discussions, and to Rik van Gijn for the conversation from Nueva Lacea. The research reported here was funded by the DobeS initiative of the Volkswagen Foundation. Commercial rights of the data lie with CEPY (Consejo Educativo del Pueblo Yurakaré). All remaining errors are mine.
Abbreviations
- Conversational transcript
- =
adjacent turns or utterances latched to each other
- (0.5)
pause, duration in seconds
- (.)
mini pause
- [
start of overlap between turns of different speakers
- ]
end of overlap
- ?
rising intonation
- ()
not fully audible
- (...)
not audible
- (())
non-verbal actions
Glosses
- 1
first person
- 2
second person
- 3
third person
- adap
adaptive
- com
comitative
- comm
commitment
- cont
continuative
- dcsd
deceased
- dem
demonstrative
- des
desiderative
- dir
directional
- ds
different subject
- f
female speaker
- fr
frustrative
- fut
future
- ideo
ideophone
- imp
imperative
- inf
inferential
- ins
instrumental
- intj
interjection
- ints
intensive
- intsubj
intersubjective
- jus
jussive
- loc
locative
- mal
malefactive
- mints
medium intensity
- neg
negator
- nsit
new situation
- obj
object
- pl
plural
- poss
possessive
- propn
proper name
- psup
presupposition
- pv
possessive verbalizer
- ref
referential
- sg
singular
- sp
Spanish
- sbj
subject
- subj
subjective
- top
topic
- vloc
verbal locative
References
Bergqvist, Henrik.this volume. Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: An introduction.Search in Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik.2013. Epistemic perspective in grammar: Theoretical and practical issues. Presentation at the Endangered Languages Week 2013 at SOAS, London, May23, 2013,http://hrelp.org/events/elw2013/assets/bergqvist_workshop.pdf(October 17,2014).Search in Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas.2005. View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society31(1). 93–120.10.3765/bls.v31i1.3429Search in Google Scholar
Gipper, Sonja.2011. Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru.2013. Territories of knowledge in Japanese conversation. PhD dissertation,Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, AnnaLindström & JakobSteensig. 2011. Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In TanyaStivers, LorenzaMondada & JakobSteensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 107–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.006Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, John.2002. Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In CeciliaFord, BarbaraFox & SandraThompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, John.2012. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45. 30–52.10.1080/08351813.2012.646685Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, John & GeoffreyRaymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly68. 15–38.10.1177/019027250506800103Search in Google Scholar
Hirtzel, Vincent.2010. Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. PhD dissertation,École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer.1969. Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Search in Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita.1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some feaqtures of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.Maxwell Atkinson & JohnHeritage (eds.), Stuctures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008Search in Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A.Schegloff & GailJefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50. 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack.2010. Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.21832/9781847692849-020Search in Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya.2005. Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction38. 131–158.10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1Search in Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik.2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik, VincentHirztel & SonjaGipper. 2011. The Yurakaré archive. Online language documentation, DobeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. Accessible at https://corpus1.mpi.nl (October17, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: An introduction
- The encoding of addressee’s perspective in Kakataibo (Panoan, Peru)
- Refracting views: How to construct complex perspective in reported speech and thought in Ungarinyin
- Using you to get to me: Addressee perspective and speaker stance in Duna evidential marking
- (Inter)subjectivity in interaction: Investigating (inter)subjective meanings in Yurakaré conversational data
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: An introduction
- The encoding of addressee’s perspective in Kakataibo (Panoan, Peru)
- Refracting views: How to construct complex perspective in reported speech and thought in Ungarinyin
- Using you to get to me: Addressee perspective and speaker stance in Duna evidential marking
- (Inter)subjectivity in interaction: Investigating (inter)subjective meanings in Yurakaré conversational data
