Home Business & Economics A Social Constructionist Approach to Institutional Change: The Case of the Romanian Competition Council
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Social Constructionist Approach to Institutional Change: The Case of the Romanian Competition Council

  • Doina Gavrilov ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 23, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Society has built institutions to face various problems in each area of our lives. Yet, institutions face considerable problems in fulfilling their objectives in a continuously changing world. With this in mind, the present study starts from the institutional resistance to change and searches for ways to improve efficiency and increase the positive impact on social welfare. For this, we start by looking at the competition authorities as new institutions and we study how they work and the role of communication, learning, and transparency in increasing institutional efficiency and receiving social legitimacy. The paper begins with a mixed theoretical approach to institutional change and focuses on the role of legitimacy in stimulating institutional change, and the type of institutional change for increasing efficiency. The research ends with the Romanian case study which shows the necessary aspects for making the institutional change real.


Corresponding author: Doina Gavrilov, PhD, Political Science, National School of Political and Administrative Studies, Bucharest, Romania, E-mail:

References

Abere, S., and T. O. Akinbobola. 2020. “External Shocks, Institutional Quality, and Macroeconomic Performance in Nigeria.” Sage Open 10 (2): 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919518.Search in Google Scholar

Andewerg, R. 1989. “Institutional Conservatism in the Netherlands: Proposals for and Resistance to Change.” West European Politics 12 (1): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402388908424722.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, S. 2005. “Institutionalism: Old and New.” Political Science, Economics 1 (1): 1–16, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843768661.00081.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Dacin, T., J. Goodstein, and R. Scott. 2002. “Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2002.6283388.Search in Google Scholar

Deephouse, D., and M. Suchman. 2008. “Organizational Institutionalism.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin, 49–77. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.10.4135/9781849200387.n2Search in Google Scholar

DiClemente, D., and D. Hantula. 2003. “Applied Behavioral Economics and Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Psychology 24: 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(03)00003-5.Search in Google Scholar

Doan, T., and P. Stevens. 2012. “Evolution of Competition in Vietnam Industries over the Recent Economic Transition.” Economics 6 (1): 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-19.Search in Google Scholar

ESMA. 2023. “Transparency Directive.” In European Securities and Markets Authority. Esma.europa.eu/regulation/corporate-disclosure/transparency-directive (accessed January 02, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2012. Competition. European Commission. ec.europa.eu/competition/con sumers/what_en.html (accessed May 20, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Gavrilov, D. 2021. “Institutionalism- a Different Perception of Human Behavior and Social Organization.” Academia Letters. Article 1632, https://doi.org/10.20935/AL1632.Search in Google Scholar

Gavrilov, D. 2022. The New Social Reality of the Europeans: A Constructivist Approach to Europeanization. Bucharest: Independently published.Search in Google Scholar

Gaynor, M. 2006. “Competition and Quality in Helath Care Markets.” Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics 2 (6): 441–508. https://doi.org/10.1561/0700000024.Search in Google Scholar

Keohane, R., and L. Martin. 1995. “The Promise of Institutional Theory.” International Security 20 (1): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.Search in Google Scholar

Keohane, R. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays In International Theory. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lustick, I. 2011. “Institutional Rigidity and Evolutionary Theory: Trapped on a Local Maximum.” Cyodynamics 2 (2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21237/c7clio2211722.Search in Google Scholar

Maag, J. 2009. “Resistance to Change: Overcoming Institutional and Individual Limitations for Improving Student Behavior through PLCs.” Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Proffessionals 1 (1): 41–57.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, J., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Institutions: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” Americal Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.Search in Google Scholar

Neven, D. 2006. “Competition Economies and Antitrust in Europe.” Economic Policy 21 (48): 1–36.10.1111/j.1468-0327.2006.00170.xSearch in Google Scholar

Niels, G., H. Jenkins, and J. Kavanagh. 2011. Economics For Competition Lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, J. 2009. “Change and Continuity: An Institutional Approach to Institutions of Democratic Government.” European Political Science Review 1 (1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773909000022.Search in Google Scholar

Oprescu, G., A. Gavrila, S. Neagoe, M. Giugariu, B. Sarbu, and N. Nemenyi. 2007. “Studii si Cercetari Privind Protectia Concurentei Economice.” Buletinul Directiei de Monitorizare teritoriala Consiliul Concurentei-Romania 1 (2): 1–186.Search in Google Scholar

Oreg, S. 2003. “Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Differences Measure.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (4): 680–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680.Search in Google Scholar

Romanian Competition Council. 2023. Annual Reports. Romanian Competition Council. consiliulconcurentei.ro/en/official-documents/reports/annual-reports/ (accessed January 10, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Schinkel, M. 2007. “Forensic Economics in Competition law Enforcement.” Forensic Economics eJournal, https://doi.org/10.1093/JOCLEC%2FNHM033.Search in Google Scholar

Tolbert, P., and L. Zucker. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 22–39, https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383.Search in Google Scholar

Zattoni, A., and F. Cuomo. 2008. “Why Adopt Codes of Good Governance? A Comparison of Institutional and Efficiency Perspectives.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 16 (1): 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00661.x.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-07
Accepted: 2023-02-10
Published Online: 2023-02-23
Published in Print: 2023-03-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2022-0015/html
Scroll to top button