Home Business & Economics The Politics of Income Inequality: Redistribution, Turnout and Responsiveness
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Politics of Income Inequality: Redistribution, Turnout and Responsiveness

  • Matthew Polacko ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 31, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Income inequality is viewed as one of the greatest challenges facing democracies today. Democracy is predicated on the ideal of equality, but political inequality occurs when the preferences of some are systematically afforded more weight in the political process than others. This research paper investigates the causal chain that allows for political inequality to arise through preference formation, articulation, and aggregation, by outlining the effects that income inequality can have on preferences for redistribution, political participation, and policy responsiveness. It finds that the policy choices presented to the electorate substantially matter for democracy, especially so in this age of increasing income inequality. There appears to be a lack of policy choice provided by political parties resulting in unequal policy responsiveness to the preferences of lower-income earners.


Corresponding author: Matthew Polacko, Département de science politique, Université du Québec à Montréal, 405 Rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Montréal, QC, H2L 2C4, Canada, E-mail:

References

Alliance of Democracies. 2021. The Democracy Perception Index 2021. Berlin: Latana. Also available at https://latana.com/democracy-perception-index/.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, C. J., and P. Beramendi. 2008. “Income, Inequality, and Electoral Participation.” In Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective, edited by P. Beramendi and C. J. Anderson, 278–311. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Armingeon, K., S. Engler, and L. Leemann. 2021. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. Also available at http://www.cpds-data.org/index.php/data.Search in Google Scholar

Bandau, F., and L. Ahrens. 2020. “The Impact of Partisanship in the Era of Retrenchment: Insights from Quantitative Welfare State Research.” Journal of European Social Policy 30 (1): 34–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928719868446.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, L. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, C. V., and R. Entman. 2011. “The Media’s Role in America’s Exceptional Politics of Inequality: Framing the Bush Tax Cuts of 2001 and 2003.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (4): 548–72, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211417334.Search in Google Scholar

Bowman, J. 2020. “Do the Affluent Override Average Americans? Measuring Policy Disagreement and Unequal Influence.” Social Science Quarterly 101 (3): 1018–37, https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12791.Search in Google Scholar

Carnes, N. 2018. The Cash Ceiling: Why Only the Rich Run for Office—And What We Can Do About It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691184203Search in Google Scholar

Carnes, N., and N. Lupu. 2021. “Working-Class Officeholding in the OECD.” In Unequal Democracies: Public Policy, Responsiveness, and Redistribution in an Era of Rising Economic Inequality [Forthcoming]. Also available at https://www.noamlupu.com/Carnes_Lupu_OECD.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, D. 2018. “A Distorting Mirror: Major Media Coverage of Americans’ Tax Policy Preferences.” Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 73. New York: Institute for New Economic Thinking.10.2139/ssrn.3228781Search in Google Scholar

Dacombe, R., and P. Parvin. 2021. “Participatory Democracy in an Age of Inequality, Representation.” Journal of Representative Democracy 57 (2): 145–57, https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1933151.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davidai, S., and T. Gilovich. 2015. “Building a More Mobile America – One Income Quintile at a Time.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 10 (1): 60–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614562005.Search in Google Scholar

Diermeier, M., H. Goecke, J. Niehues, and T. Thomas. 2017. “Impact of Inequality-Related Media Coverage on the Concerns of Citizens.” DICE Discussion Papers No. 258. Düsseldorf: University of Düsseldorf.Search in Google Scholar

Elsässer, L., S. Hense, and A. Schäfer. 2021. “Not Just Money: Unequal Responsiveness in Egalitarian Democracies.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (12): 1890–908.10.1080/13501763.2020.1801804Search in Google Scholar

Engelhardt, C., and A. Wagener. 2014. “Biased Perceptions of Income Inequality and Redistribution.” Hannover Economic Papers No. 526. Hannover: University of Hannover.10.2139/ssrn.2463129Search in Google Scholar

Engler, S., and D. Weisstanner. 2021. “The Threat of Social Decline: Income Inequality and Radical Right Support.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (2): 153–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1733636.Search in Google Scholar

Epp, D. 2018. “Policy Agendas and Economic Inequality in American Politics.” Political Studies 66 (4): 922–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717736951.Search in Google Scholar

Epp, D., and E. Borghetto. 2021. “Legislative Agendas During Periods of Inequality: Evidence from Europe and the United States.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (4): 532–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1734060.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, G., and J. Tilley. 2017. The New Politics of Class: The Political Exclusion of the British Working Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755753.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Flavin, P., and W. Franko. 2017. “Government’s Unequal Attentiveness to Citizens’ Political Priorities.” Policy Studies Journal 45 (4): 659–87, https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12184.Search in Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. 2016. Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400880270Search in Google Scholar

Franko, W., and C. Witko. 2018. The New Economic Populism: How States Respond to Economic Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190671013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Freedom House 2021. Freedom in the World 2021: Democracy Under Siege [Online]. Also available at https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2021/democracy-under-siege.Search in Google Scholar

Galbraith, J. K., and T. J. Hale. 2008. “State Income Inequality and Presidential Election Turnout and Outcomes.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (4): 887–901, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00589.x.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, A. 2015. Unequal Political Participation Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139151726Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, A. 2016. “Inequality and the Erosion of Trust Among the Poor: Experimental Evidence.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (3): 443–60, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww010.Search in Google Scholar

Gilens, M. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400844821Search in Google Scholar

Gimpelson, V., and D. Treisman. 2018. “Misperceiving Inequality.” Economics & Politics 30 (1): 27–54, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103.Search in Google Scholar

Goodin, R., and J. Dryzek. 1980. “Rational Participation: The Politics of Relative Power.” British Journal of Political Science 10 (3): 273–92, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400002209.Search in Google Scholar

Goubin, S., and M. Hooghe. 2020. “The Effect of Inequality on the Relation between Socioeconomic Stratifcation and Political Trust in Europe.” Social Justice Research 33: 219–47, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00350-z.Search in Google Scholar

Gründler, K., and S. Köllner. 2017. “Determinants of Governmental Redistribution: Income Distribution, Development Levels, and the Role of Perceptions.” Journal of Comparative Economics 45 (4): 930–62.10.1016/j.jce.2016.10.007Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, J., and P. Pierson. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Harkins, S., and J. Lugo-Ocando. 2017. Poor News: Media Discourses of Poverty in Times of Austerity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International.Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, O., and M. Norton. 2017. “(Mis)perceptions of Inequality.” Current Opinion in Psychology 18: 21–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.024.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, T. J. 2013. “Responsiveness in an Era of Inequality: The Case of the U.S. Senate.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3): 585–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912459567.Search in Google Scholar

Holland, A. 2018. “Diminished Expectations: Redistributive Preferences in Truncated Welfare States.” World Politics 70 (4): 555–94, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887118000096.Search in Google Scholar

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2021. Voter Turnout Database. Stockholm [Online]. Also available at https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout.Search in Google Scholar

Iversen, T., and D. Soskice. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165–81, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055406062083.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, A., S. Matthews, T. Hicks, and E. Merkley. 2021. “Whose News? The Media and the Distribution of Economic Gains and Losses.” American Political Science Review 115 (3): 1016–33, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000137.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, C., and K. Van Kersbergen. 2017. The Politics of Inequality. London: Palgrave.10.1057/978-1-137-42702-1Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, N., and P. Enns. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 855–70, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00472.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kendall, D. 2011. Framing Class: Media Representations of Wealth and Poverty in America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Kenworthy, L., and L. McCall. 2008. “Inequality, Public Opinion and Redistribution.” Socio-Economic Review 6 (1): 35–68.10.1093/ser/mwm006Search in Google Scholar

Kollmeyer, C. 2004. “Corporate Interests: How the News Media Portray the Economy.” Social Problems 51 (3): 432–52, https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.3.432.Search in Google Scholar

Korpi, W. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Kuziemko, I., M. Norton, E. Saez, and S. Stantcheva. 2015. “How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments.” The American Economic Review 105 (4): 1478–508, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130360.Search in Google Scholar

Lancee, B., and H. Van de Werfhorst. 2012. “Income Inequality and Participation: A Comparison of 24 European Countries.” Social Science Research 41 (5): 1166–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

Lasswell, H. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Meridian.Search in Google Scholar

Lefkofridi, Z., and N. Giger. 2020. “Democracy or Oligarchy? Unequal Representation of Income Groups in European Institutions.” Politics and Governance 8 (1): 19–27, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2526.Search in Google Scholar

Leighley, J., and J. Nagler. 2014. Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848621Search in Google Scholar

Lindert, P. 2004. Growing Public: Volume 1, The Story: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510717Search in Google Scholar

Loveless, M. 2016. “Inequality and Support for Political Engagement in New Democracies.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (6): 1003–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1203865.Search in Google Scholar

Lupu, N., and J. Pontusson. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 316–36, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000128.Search in Google Scholar

Lupu, N., and Z. Warner. 2021. “Affluence and Congruence: Unequal Representation Around the World.” Journal of Politics [Online], https://doi.org/10.1086/714930.Search in Google Scholar

Macdonald, D. 2020. “Trust in Government and the American Public’s Responsiveness to Rising Inequality.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (4): 790–804, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919856110.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, J. 2016. Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. New York: Anchor Books.Search in Google Scholar

McCall, L., D. Burk, M. Laperrière, and J. Richeson. 2017. “Exposure to Rising Inequality Shapes Americans’ Opportunity Beliefs and Policy Support.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (36): 9593–8, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706253114.Search in Google Scholar

McCall, L. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs About Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139225687Search in Google Scholar

Meltzer, A., and S. Richard. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–27, https://doi.org/10.1086/261013.Search in Google Scholar

Mijs, J. 2021. “The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy Go Hand in Hand.” Socio-Economic Review 19 (1): 7–35, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051.Search in Google Scholar

Norton, M., and D. Ariely. 2011. “Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 9–12, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524.Search in Google Scholar

O’Grady, T. 2019. “Careerists Versus Coal-Miners: Welfare Reforms and the Substantive Representation of Social Groups in the British Labour Party.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (4): 544–78.10.1177/0010414018784065Search in Google Scholar

Petrova, B. 2021. “Redistribution and the Quality of Government: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 374–93, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123419000085.Search in Google Scholar

Petrova, M. 2008. “Inequality and Media Capture.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (1–2): 183–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Polacko, M. 2021. “Inequality, Policy Polarization, and the Income Gap in Turnout.” Party Politics [Online], https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211011924.Search in Google Scholar

Polacko, M., O. Heath, M. Lewis-Beck, and R. Dassonneville. 2021. “Policy Polarization, Economic Inequality and Turnout.” Political Studies 69 (2): 455–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720906581.Search in Google Scholar

Potrafke, N. 2017. “Partisan Politics: The Empirical Evidence from OECD Panel Studies.” Journal of Comparative Economics 45 (4): 712–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Reid-Henry, S. 2015. The Political Origins of Inequality: Why a More Equal World is Better for Us All. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226236827.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Romer, T. 1975. “Individual Welfare, Majority voting and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax.” Journal of Public Economics 4 (2): 163–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(75)90016-x.Search in Google Scholar

Rosset, J., N. Giger, and J. Bernauer. 2013. “More Money, Fewer Problems? Cross-Level Effects of Economic Deprivation on Political Representation.” West European Politics 36 (4): 817–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.783353.Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, A., and W. Streeck. 2013. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Policy Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, A., and H. Schwander. 2019. “‘Don’t Play if You Can’t Win’: Does Economic Inequality Undermine Political Equality?” European Political Science Review 11 (3): 395–413.10.1017/S1755773919000201Search in Google Scholar

Schakel, W. 2021. “Unequal Policy Responsiveness in The Netherlands.” Socio-Economic Review 19 (1): 37–57, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz018.Search in Google Scholar

Solt, F. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 48–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x.Search in Google Scholar

Solt, F. 2010. “Does Economic Inequality Depress Electoral Participation? Testing the Schattschneider Hypothesis.” Political Behavior 32 (2): 285–301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9106-0.Search in Google Scholar

Solt, F. 2020. “Measuring Income Inequality Across Countries and Over Time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database.” Social Science Quarterly. Version 9.0 101 (3): 1183–99, https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795.Search in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. 2013. The Price of Inequality. London: Penguin Books.10.1111/npqu.11358Search in Google Scholar

Stilwell, F. 2019. The Political Economy of Inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Steinbrecher, M., and G. Seeber. 2011. “Inequality and Turnout in Europe.” American Political Science Association (APSA) 2011 Annual Meeting Paper, Seattle, 1–4 September. Also available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1901620.Search in Google Scholar

Szewczyk, J., and M. Crowder-Meyer. 2020. “Community income Inequality and the Economic Gap in Participation.” Political Behavior [Online], https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09621-6.Search in Google Scholar

Trump, K.-S. 2018. “Income Inequality Influences Perceptions of Legitimate Income Differences.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 929–52, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123416000326.Search in Google Scholar

Verba, S., S. Kay, and B. Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-31
Accepted: 2022-05-11
Published Online: 2022-05-31
Published in Print: 2022-06-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2021-0018/html
Scroll to top button