Home A new test for non-linear hypotheses under distributional and local parametric misspecification
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A new test for non-linear hypotheses under distributional and local parametric misspecification

  • Anil K. Bera , Osman Doğan ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Süleyman Taşpınar
Published/Copyright: November 29, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics
From the journal Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics Volume 27 Issue 5

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a new version of Rao’s score (RS) statistic for testing a non-linear hypothesis under both distributional and local parametric misspecification. Our suggested test statistic is constructed through a size correction approach so that it becomes robust to both types of misspecification. We establish the asymptotic properties of the robust test statistic and provide several examples to illustrate its implementation. We also investigate the finite sample properties of our test along with some other well-known tests through simulations. Our simulation results demonstrate that the new test statistic has good finite sample properties in terms of empirical size and power.

Keywords: distributional misspecification; LM test; parametric misspecification; QMLE; Rao’s score test; robust LM test
Corresponding author: Osman Doğan, Department of Economics, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions. This paper is dedicated to Dr. C. R. Rao to celebrate his 100th birthday which was on September 10, 2020.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Abadir, K. M., and J. R. Magnus. 2005. Matrix Algebra. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810800Search in Google Scholar

Aitchison, J., and S. D. Silvey. 1958. “Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Parameters Subject to Restraints.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29 (3): 813–28. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706538.Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, D. W. K. 1991. “Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation.” Econometrica 593: 817–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938229.Search in Google Scholar

Anselin, L., A. K. Bera, R. Florax, and M. J. Yoon. 1996. “Simple Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (1): 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6.Search in Google Scholar

Baltagi, B. H., and D. Li. 2001. “LM Tests for Functional Form and Spatial Error Correlation.” International Regional Science Review 24 (2): 194–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001760102400202.Search in Google Scholar

Baltagi, B. H., S. H. Song, and B. C. Jung. 2002. “Simple LM Tests for the Unbalanced Nested Error Component Regression Model.” Econometric Reviews 21 (2): 167–87. https://doi.org/10.1081/etc-120014347.Search in Google Scholar

Bao, Y. 2018. “The Asymptotic Covariance Matrix of the QMLE in ARMA Models.” Econometric Reviews 37 (4): 309–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2016.1140287.Search in Google Scholar

Bera, A. K., and M. J. Yoon. 1993. “Specification Testing with Locally Misspecified Alternatives.” Econometric Theory 9 (4): 649–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600008021.Search in Google Scholar

Bera, A. K., W. Sosa-Escudero, and Y. Mann. 2001. “Tests for the Error Component Model in the Presence of Local Misspecification.” Journal of Econometrics 101 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(00)00071-3.Search in Google Scholar

Bera, A. K., G. Montes-Rojas, and W. Sosa-Escudero. 2010. “General Specification Testing with Locally Misspecified Models.” Econometric Theory 26 (06): 1838–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466609990818.Search in Google Scholar

Bera, A. K., D. Osman, and S. Taşpınar. 2018. “Simple Tests for Endogeneity of Spatial Weights Matrices.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 69: 130–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

Bera, A. K., O. Doğan, S. Taşpınar, and Y. Leiluo. 2019a. “Robust LM Tests for Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 76: 47–66.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Bera, A. K., B. Yannis, Y. Mann J, S. Taşpınar, and O. Doğan. 2019b. “Adjustments of Rao’s Score Test for Distributional and Local Parametric Misspecifications.” Journal of Econometric Methods 9 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/jem-2017-0022.Search in Google Scholar

Bera, A., G. Montes-Rojas, W. Sosa-Escudero, and J. Alejo. 2020. “Tests for Nonlinear Restrictions under Misspecified Alternatives with an Application to Testing Rational Expectation Hypotheses.” The Econometrics Journal 24 (1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaa010.Search in Google Scholar

Dagenais, M. G., and J. M. Dufour. 1991. “Invariance, Nonlinear Models, and Asymptotic Tests.” Econometrica 59 (6): 1601–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938281.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon. 1987. “Implicit Alternatives and the Local Power of Test Statistics.” Econometrica 55 (6): 1305–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913558.Search in Google Scholar

Doğan, O., S. Taşpınar, and A. K. Bera. 2021. “A Bayesian Robust Chi-Squared Test for Testing Simple Hypotheses.” Journal of Econometrics 222 (2): 933–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.046. Bera.Search in Google Scholar

Florax, R. J. G. M., H. Folmer, and S. J. Rey. 2003. “Specification Searches in Spatial Econometrics: The Relevance of Hendry’s Methodology.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 33 (5): 557–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0462(03)00002-4.Search in Google Scholar

Foutz, R. V., and R. C. Srivastava. 1977. “The Performance of the Likelihood Ratio Test when the Model Is Incorrect.” Annals of Statistics 5 (6): 1183–94. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344003.Search in Google Scholar

Godfrey, L. G., and M. R. Veal. 2000. “Alternative Approaches to Testing by Variable Addition.” Econometric Reviews 19 (2): 241–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930008800470.Search in Google Scholar

Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort, and A. Trognon. 1984. “Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Theory.” Econometrica 52 (3): 681–700. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913471.Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kent, J. T. 1982. “Robust Properties of Likelihood Ratio Test.” Biometrika 69 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335849.Search in Google Scholar

Lafontaine, F., and K. J. White. 1986. “Obtaining Any Wald Statistic You Want.” Economics Letters 21 (1): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(86)90117-5.Search in Google Scholar

Newey, W. K., and K. D. West. 1987. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica 55 (3): 703–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913610.Search in Google Scholar

Neyman, J., and E. S. Pearson. 1933. “On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London – Series A: Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 231: 289–337.10.1098/rsta.1933.0009Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, P. C. B., and J. Y. Park. 1988. “On the Formulation of Wald Tests of Nonlinear Restrictions.” Econometrica 56 (5): 1065–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911359.Search in Google Scholar

Rao, C. R. 1948. “Large Sample Tests of Statistical Hypotheses Concerning Several Parameters with Applications to Problems of Estimation.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 44: 50–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305004100023987.Search in Google Scholar

Saikkonen, P. 1989. “Asymptotic Relative Efficiency of the Classical Test Statistics under Misspecification.” Journal of Econometrics 42 (3): 351–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(89)90058-4.Search in Google Scholar

Silvey, S. D. 1959. “The Lagrangian Multiplier Test.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30 (2): 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706259.Search in Google Scholar

Taşpınar, S., O. Doğan, and A. K. Bera. 2017. “GMM Gradient Tests for Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 65: 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.04.008.Search in Google Scholar

Wald, A. 1943. “Tests of Statistical Hypotheses Concerning Several Parameters when the Number of Observations is Large.” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 54 (3): 426–82. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-1943-0012401-3.Search in Google Scholar

White, H. 1982. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models.” Econometrica 50 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912004.Search in Google Scholar

White, H. 1994. Estimation, Inference and Specification Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521252806Search in Google Scholar

Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2022-0043).

Received: 2022-04-29
Accepted: 2022-11-09
Published Online: 2022-11-29

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Article
  3. Analysis of heterogeneous duopoly game with information asymmetry based on extrapolative mechanism
  4. Review
  5. Modelling volatility dependence with score copula models
  6. Research Articles
  7. A new test for non-linear hypotheses under distributional and local parametric misspecification
  8. Optimization study of momentum investment strategies under asymmetric power-law distribution of return rate
  9. Comparison of Score-Driven Equity-Gold Portfolios During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Model Confidence Sets
  10. Integrated variance of irregularly spaced high-frequency data: A state space approach based on pre-averaging
https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2022-0043
Keywords for this article
distributional misspecification; LM test; parametric misspecification; QMLE; Rao’s score test; robust LM test

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Article
  3. Analysis of heterogeneous duopoly game with information asymmetry based on extrapolative mechanism
  4. Review
  5. Modelling volatility dependence with score copula models
  6. Research Articles
  7. A new test for non-linear hypotheses under distributional and local parametric misspecification
  8. Optimization study of momentum investment strategies under asymmetric power-law distribution of return rate
  9. Comparison of Score-Driven Equity-Gold Portfolios During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Model Confidence Sets
  10. Integrated variance of irregularly spaced high-frequency data: A state space approach based on pre-averaging
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 21.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/snde-2022-0043/html
Scroll to top button