Abstract
Most previous studies that examined the relationship between the size of shadow economy and the pillars of sustainable development maintained that this relationship is linear. This paper provides an empirical contribution to the literature by arguing that this relationship is likely to be nonlinear, and it might be subject to threshold effects. For this purpose, in addition to the static threshold panel model of Hansen (1999. “Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference.” Journal of Econometrics 93 (2): 345–68), the dynamic panel threshold model suggested by Seo and Shin (2016. “Dynamic Panels with Threshold Effect and Endogeneity.” Journal of Econometrics 195 (2): 169–86) has been applied to a larger panel-data set covering 83 developed and developing countries over the 1996–2017 period. Empirical results from both models yield evidence advocating the existence of threshold effects of the shadow economy on the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development for the global sample as well as the sub-samples of developed and developing countries. Moreover, for the global sample and developing countries, our findings show that shadow economy would spoil the three sustainable development pillars only when its size exceeds a certain threshold critical size. While, the impact for developed countries was found negative even for low levels of underground activities. These finding are shown to be robust to alternative proxies for the size of the shadow economy and have important policy implications, especially for developing countries. In these countries, a moderate size of the shadow economy might have positive spillovers on long-term growth and sustainable development. Our research also suggests that, for developing and developed countries to achieve sustainable goal 8.3, the extent of the shadow activities should be taken into account.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank warmly an anonymous referee for valuable comments and suggestions.
-
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
List of variables, description, and sources.
Variable | Description | Sources |
---|---|---|
Growth | The growth rate of real per capita GDP | World bank development indicators |
|
The initial level of per capita GDP | World bank development indicators |
School | Share of population enrolled in secondary schooling | World bank development indicators |
Inv | Ratio of investment | World bank development indicators |
Open | Openness rate (sum of imports and exports over GDP) | World bank development indicators |
Gov | Government spending(%GDP) | World bank development indicators |
SE | Shadow economy size(%GDP) | Medina and Schneider (2019) estimates |
HDI | The human development index | United nations development program |
EF | The economic freedom index | Heritage foundation |
Dem | The polity index | Polity IV database |
Urban | Urban population in percentage of total population | World bank development indicators |
EPI | The environmental performance index | The yale university center for environmental law and policy |
Summary statistics.
Growth |
|
School | Inv | Open | Gov | SE | HDI | EF | Dem | Urb | EPI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 2.1 | 17,849.85 | 80.7 | 22.04 | 67.09 | 15.5 | 29.32 | 0.96 | 61.52 | 6.54 | 59.67 | 51.1 |
Median | 2.14 | 5917.84 | 86.7 | 21.7 | 58.15 | 15.21 | 29.87 | 0.71 | 61.5 | 77.56 | 62.29 | 47.1 |
Max | 23.93 | 91,565.73 | 163.7 | 43.5 | 226.7 | 27.93 | 70.57 | 0.95 | 83.7 | 10 | 97.9 | 90.4 |
Min | −15.04 | 200.63 | 5.28 | 4.45 | 16.98 | 4.13 | 5.4 | 0.84 | 21.4 | 0 | 13.22 | 17.1 |
Std.Dev | 3.17 | 21.49 | 34.21 | 5.24 | 34.10 | 4.89 | 13.21 | 0.17 | 9.75 | 5.15 | 21.01 | 17.7 |
Skewness | −0.49 | −0.86 | −0.34 | 0.82 | 1.74 | 0.2 | 0.21 | −0.5 | −0.2 | −10.3 | −0.37 | 0.51 |
Kurtosis | 7.68 | 2.67 | 2.58 | 4.79 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 2.51 | 2.35 | 3.33 | 87.6 | 2.16 | 2.06 |
Jarque-Bera | 12.36 | 22.98 | 234.42 | 32.2 | 13.58 | 24.21 | 40.48 | 28.7 | 21.39 | 2.6 | 94.9 | 48.1 |
Observations | 1296 | 1296 | 1296 | 1296 | 1296 | 1296 | 1826 | 1826 | 1826 | 1826 | 1826 | 1826 |
Countries classification by shadow economy regime, based on estimations from column 1 of Table 1.
Shadow below threshold | Shadow above threshold |
---|---|
Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland | Algeria, Bangladech, Belgium, Bolivia, Bulgaria |
France, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand | Cameroon, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador |
Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United States | Greece, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Iran, Italy |
Madagascar, Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, Morocco | |
Mozambique, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland | |
Portugal, Romania, Senegal, Spain, Sri Lanka | |
Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda,Uruguay |
Countries classification by shadow economy regime, based on estimations from column 2 of Table 1.
Shadow below threshold | Shadow above threshold |
---|---|
Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Austria | Bolivia, Gabon, Guatemala, Haiti |
Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria | Honduras, Nigeria, Peru, Thailand |
Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Canada, Chile | Ukraine, Uruguay, Zimbabwe |
China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Denmark | |
Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt | |
El Salvador, Finland, France, Germany | |
Ghana, Greece, Guinea-Bissau, Hungary | |
India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica | |
Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi | |
Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique | |
Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman | |
Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Portugal | |
Romania, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Slovenia | |
South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden | |
Switzerland, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda | |
United ArabEmirates, United Kingdom | |
United StatesVenezuela |
Countries classification by shadow economy, based on estimations from column 3 of Table 1.
Shadow below threshold | Shadow above threshold |
---|---|
Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Australia | Bolivia, El Salvador, Gabon |
Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana | Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras |
Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon | Nigeria, Peru, Thailand, Ukraine |
Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica | Uruguay, Zimbabwe |
Croatia, Denmark, Dominican Republic | |
Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, France | |
Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea-Bissau | |
Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland | |
Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya | |
Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali | |
Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique | |
Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger | |
Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay | |
Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Senega | |
l Sierra Leone, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain | |
Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Togo | |
Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, United ArabEmirates | |
United Kingdom, United States, Venezuela |
References
Acemoglu, D., F. A. Gallego, and J. A. Robinson. 2014. “Institutions, Human Capital, and Development.” Annual Review of Economics 6 (1): 875–912. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041119.Search in Google Scholar
Afonso, O., P. C. Neves, and T. Pinto. 2020. “The Non-observed Economy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis.” Economic Systems 44 (1): 100746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100746.Search in Google Scholar
Aidt, T. S. 2011. “Corruption and sustainable development.” In International handbook on the economics of corruption, 2, edited by S. Rose-Ackerman, and T. Søreide, 3–51. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar
Akçay, S. 2006. “Corruption and Human Development.” Cato Journal 26 (1): 29–48.Search in Google Scholar
Amorós, J. E., J. P. Couyoumdjian, O. Cristi, and M. Minniti. 2016. “The bottom-up power of informal entrepreneurship.” In Entrepreneurship and Shadow Economy, edited by A. Sauka, F. Scheiner, and C. Williams, 9–29. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781784719883.00008Search in Google Scholar
Arvin-Rad, H., A. K. Basu, and M. Willumsen. 2010. “Economic Reform, Informal–Formal Sector Linkages and Intervention in the Informal Sector in Developing Countries: A Paradox.” International Review of Economics & Finance 19 (4): 662–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2010.04.002.Search in Google Scholar
Baklouti, N., and Y. Boujelbene. 2019. “The Economic Growth–Inflation–Shadow Economy Trilogy: Developed versus Developing Countries.” International Economic Journal 33 (4): 679–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2019.1641540.Search in Google Scholar
Baksi, S., and P. Bose. 2010. “Environmental Regulation in the Presence of an Informal Sector.” In University of Winnipeg Department of Economics Working Paper 3, 1–28.Search in Google Scholar
Baloch, A., S. Z. Shah, S. Rasheed, and B. Rasheed. 2021. “The Impact of Shadow Economy on Environmental Degradation: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan.” Geojournal 87: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10354-6.Search in Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2): 407–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943.Search in Google Scholar
Bejaković, P. 2004. “The Informal Economy in Croatia and Economic Development.” SEER-South-East Europe Review for Labour and Social Affairs 7: 69–78.Search in Google Scholar
Berdiev, A. N., and J. W. Saunoris. 2019. “On the Relationship between Income Inequality and the Shadow Economy.” Eastern Economic Journal 45 (2): 224–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-018-0120-y.Search in Google Scholar
Berthélemy, J., and S. Démurger. 2000. “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Theorical Issues and Empirical Application in China.” Review of Developpement Economics 12: 145–70.Search in Google Scholar
Biswas, A. K., M. R. Farzanegan, and M. Thum. 2012. “Pollution, Shadow Economy and Corruption: Theory and Evidence.” Ecological Economics 75: 114–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.007.Search in Google Scholar
Bologna, J. 2016. “The Effect of Informal Employment and Corruption on Income Levels in Brazil.” Journal of Comparative Economics 44 (3): 657–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.001.Search in Google Scholar
Buehn, A., and M. R. Farzanegan. 2013. “Impact of Education on the Shadow Economy: Institutions Matter.” Economics Bulletin 33 (3): 2052–63.Search in Google Scholar
Canh, N. P., S. Thanh, S. Schinckus, J. Bensemann, and L. Thanh. 2019. “Global Emissions: A New Contribution from the Shadow Economy.” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 9 (3): 320–37. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7244.Search in Google Scholar
Chakroun, M., N. Chrid, and S. Saafi. 2021. “Does Export Upgrading Really Matter to Economic Growth? Evidence from Panel Data for High-, Middle-And Low-Income Countries.” International Journal of Finance & Economics 26 (4): 5584–609.https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2082.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, H., Y. Hao, J. Li, and X. Song. 2018. “The Impact of Environmental Regulation, Shadow Economy, and Corruption on Environmental Quality: Theory and Empirical Evidence from China.” Journal of Cleaner Production 195: 200–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.206.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, H., F. Schneider, and Q. Sun. 2020. “Measuring the Size of the Shadow Economy in 30 Provinces of China over 1995–2016: The MIMIC Approach.” Pacific Economic Review 25 (3): 427–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12313.Search in Google Scholar
Choi, J. P., and M. Thum. 2005. “Corruption and the Shadow Economy.” International Economic Review 46 (3): 817–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2005.00347.x.Search in Google Scholar
Delgado, M. S., D. J. Henderson, and C. F. Parmeter. 2014. “Does Education Matter for Economic Growth?” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 76 (3): 334–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12025.Search in Google Scholar
Dell’Anno, R. 2008. “What Is the Relationship between Unofficial and Official Economy? an Analysis in Latin American Countries.” European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences 12 (8): 185–203.Search in Google Scholar
Dell’Anno, R. 2010. “Institutions and Human Development in the Latin American Informal Economy.” Constitutional Political Economy 21 (3): 207–30.10.1007/s10602-009-9079-3Search in Google Scholar
Dell’Anno, R. 2016. “Analyzing the Determinants of the Shadow Economy with a “Separate Approach”. An Application of the Relationship between Inequality and the Shadow Economy.” World Development 84: 342–56.10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.026Search in Google Scholar
Dell’Anno, R., and F. Schneider. 2003. “The Shadow Economy of Italy and Other OECD Countries: What Do We Know?” Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 21 (2–3): 97–120.10.1332/251569203X15668905422009Search in Google Scholar
Dhahri, S., and A. Omri. 2018. “Entrepreneurship Contribution to the Three Pillars of Sustainable Development: What Does the Evidence Really Say?” World Development 106: 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008.Search in Google Scholar
Di Caro, P., and A. Sacchi. 2020. “The Heterogeneous Effects of Labor Informality on VAT Revenues: Evidence on a Developed Country.” Journal of Macroeconomics 63: 103190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2020.103190.Search in Google Scholar
Duarte, P. 2017. “The Relationship between GDP and the Size of the Informal Economy: Empirical Evidence for Spain.” Empirical Economics 52 (4): 1409–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1109-1.Search in Google Scholar
Eilat, Y., and C. Zinnes. 2002. “The Shadow Economy in Transition Countries: Friend or Foe? A Policy Perspective.” World Development 30 (7): 1233–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(02)00036-0.Search in Google Scholar
Elgin, C. 2021. “Foreign Direct Investment, Informality and Technology Transfer.” Review of Development Economics 25 (2): 994–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12742.Search in Google Scholar
Elgin, C., and S. Birinci. 2016. “Growth and Informality: A Comprehensive Panel Data Analysis.” Journal of Applied Economics 19 (2): 271–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1514-0326(16)30011-3.Search in Google Scholar
Elgin, C., and O. Oztunali. 2012. “Shadow Economies Around the World: Model Based Estimates.” In Bogazici University Department of Economics Working Papers (05), 1–48.Search in Google Scholar
Elgin, C., and O. Oztunali. 2014a. “Institutions, Informal Economy, and Economic Development.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 50 (4): 145–62. https://doi.org/10.2753/ree1540-496x500409.Search in Google Scholar
Elgin, C., and O. Oztunali. 2014b. “Pollution and Informal Economy.” Economic Systems 38 (3): 333–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2013.11.002.Search in Google Scholar
Elgin, C., M. A. Kose, F. Ohnsorge, and S. Yu. 2021. “Understanding Informality.” Discussion Paper 16497 2021 (76): 1–27.10.2139/ssrn.3916568Search in Google Scholar
Enste, D. H. 2003. “Shadow Economy and Institutional Change in Transition Countries.” In The Informal Economy in the EU Accession Countries: Size, Scope, Trends and Challenges to the Process of EU Enlargement, 81–113. Centre for the Study of Democracy. Sofia.Search in Google Scholar
Esaku, S. 2021. “Is Informality a Barrier to Economic Growth in Uganda? Empirical Analysis.” Development Studies Research 8 (1): 109–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2021.1919167.Search in Google Scholar
Farzanegan, M. R., M. Hassan, and A. M. Badreldin. 2020. “Economic Liberalization in Egypt: A Way to Reduce the Shadow Economy?” Journal of Policy Modeling 42 (2): 307–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.09.008.Search in Google Scholar
Feruni, N., E. Hysa, M. Panait, I. G. Rădulescu, and A. Brezoi. 2020. “The Impact of Corruption, Economic Freedom and Urbanization on Economic Development: Western Balkans versus EU-27.” Sustainability 12 (22): 9743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229743.Search in Google Scholar
Giles, D. E., L. M. Tedds, and G. Werkneh. 2002. “The Canadian Underground and Measured Economies: Granger Causality Results.” Applied Economics 34 (18): 2347–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210148021.Search in Google Scholar
Goel, R. K., R. Herrala, and U. Mazhar. 2013. “Institutional Quality and Environmental Pollution: MENA Countries versus the Rest of the World.” Economic Systems 37 (4): 508–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2013.04.002.Search in Google Scholar
Goel, R. K., and M. A. Nelson. 2016. “Shining a Light on the Shadows: Identifying Robust Determinants of the Shadow Economy.” Economic Modelling 58: 351–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.06.009.Search in Google Scholar
Goel, R. K., J. W. Saunoris, and F. Schneider. 2019. “Growth in the Shadows: Effect of the Shadow Economy on US Economic Growth over More Than a Century.” Contemporary Economic Policy 37 (1): 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12288.Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, B. E. 1999. “Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference.” Journal of Econometrics 93 (2): 345–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00025-1.Search in Google Scholar
Hassan, M., and F. Schneider. 2016. “Modelling the Egyptian Shadow Economy: A Currency Demand and a MIMIC Model Approach.” Available at SSRN 2743153 3(2).10.2139/ssrn.2743153Search in Google Scholar
Heritage 2021. “Index of Economic Freedom.” In Working Paper. Also available at https://www.heritage.org/index/about.Search in Google Scholar
Hoinaru, R., D. Buda, S. N. Borlea, V. L. Văidean, and M. V. Achim. 2020. “The Impact of Corruption and Shadow Economy on the Economic and Sustainable Development. Do They “Sand the Wheels” or “Grease the Wheels.” Sustainability 12 (2): 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020481.Search in Google Scholar
Huynh, C. M. 2020. “Shadow Economy and Air Pollution in Developing Asia: What Is the Role of Fiscal Policy?” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 22 (3): 357–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-019-00260-8.Search in Google Scholar
Huynh, C. M., V. H. T. Nguyen, H. B. Nguyen, and P. C. Nguyen. 2020. “One-way Effect or Multiple-Way Causality: Foreign Direct Investment, Institutional Quality and Shadow Economy?” International Economics and Economic Policy 17 (1): 219–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-019-00454-1.Search in Google Scholar
Imamoglu, H. 2018. “Is the Informal Economic Activity a Determinant of Environmental Quality?” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (29): 29078–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2925-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Khuong, N. V., M. S. Shabbir, M. S. Sial, and T. H. T. Khanh. 2021. “Does Informal Economy Impede Economic Growth? Evidence from an Emerging Economy.” Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment 11 (2): 103–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1711501.Search in Google Scholar
La Porta, R., and A. Shleifer. 2008. “The Unofficial Economy and Economic Development.” In NBER Working Papers (14520).10.3386/w14520Search in Google Scholar
La Porta, R., and A. Shleifer. 2014. “Informality and Development.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 109–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.109.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, M., J. D. Alba, and D. Park. 2018. “Intellectual Property Rights, Informal Economy, and FDI into Developing Countries.” Journal of Policy Modeling 40 (5): 1067–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.07.003.Search in Google Scholar
Loayza, N. V. 1996. The Economics of the Informal Sector: A Simple Model and Some Empirical Evidence from Latin America, Vol 45, 129–62. Elsevier.10.1016/S0167-2231(96)00021-8Search in Google Scholar
Loayza, N. V. 2016. “Informality in the Process of Development and Growth.” The World Economy 39 (12): 1856–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12480.Search in Google Scholar
Madsen, J. B., P. A. Raschky, and A. Skali. 2015. “Does Democracy Drive Income in the World, 1500–2000?” European Economic Review 78: 175–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.05.005.Search in Google Scholar
Maiti, D., and C. Bhattacharyya. 2020. “Informality, Enforcement and Growth.” Economic Modelling 84: 259–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.015.Search in Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer, and D. N. Weil. 1992. “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 407–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477.Search in Google Scholar
Mawusi, C. 2021. “Does Informality and Trade Openness Impact Long RunGrowth? Empirical Evidence from Ghana.” Economics Bulletin 41 (1): 28–40.Search in Google Scholar
Mazhar, U., and C. Elgin. 2013. “Environmental Regulation, Pollution and the Informal Economy.” SBP Research Bulletin 9: 62–81. https://doi.org/10.4103/2320-3897.106291.Search in Google Scholar
Medina, L., and F. Schneider. 2019. “Shedding Light on the Shadow Economy: A Global Database and the Interaction with the Official One.” In CESifo Working Paper (7981).10.2139/ssrn.3502028Search in Google Scholar
Medina, L., and F. Schneider. 2020. “Shedding Light on the Shadow Economy.” World Economics 21 (2): 25–82.Search in Google Scholar
Motegi, K., X. Cai, S. Hamori, and H. Xu. 2020. “Moving Average Threshold Heterogeneous Autoregressive (MAT-HAR) Models.” Journal of Forecasting 39 (7): 1035–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2671.Search in Google Scholar
Mughal, K. S., and F. G. Schneider. 2020. “How Informal Sector Affects the Formal Economy in Pakistan? A Lesson for Developing Countries.” South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance 9 (1): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277978719898975.Search in Google Scholar
Neumayer, E. 2001. “The Human Development Index and Sustainability—A Constructive Proposal.” Ecological Economics 39 (1): 101–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00201-4.Search in Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. V., and M. T. H. Duong. 2021. “Shadow Economy, Corruption and Economic Growth: an Analysis of BRICS Countries.” The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 8 (4): 665–72.Search in Google Scholar
Nicholls, J., and A. Drewnowski. 2021. “Toward Sociocultural Indicators of Sustainable Healthy Diets.” Sustainability 13 (13): 7226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137226.Search in Google Scholar
Nikopour, H., M. Shah Habibullah, and F. Schneider. 2008. “The Shadow Economy Kuznets’s Curve Panel Data Analysis.” In MPRA Paper 12956. Germany: Library of Munich.Search in Google Scholar
Nkengfack, H., H. Kaffo Fotio, and A. Totouom. 2021. “How Does the Shadow Economy Affect Environmental Quality in Sub-saharan Africa? Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Estimations.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 12 (4): 1635–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00685-7.Search in Google Scholar
Ofosu-Mensah Ababio, J., E. Attah-Botchwey, E. Osei-Assibey, and C. Barnor. 2021. “Financial Inclusion and Human Development in Frontier Countries.” International Journal of Finance & Economics 26 (1): 42–59.10.1002/ijfe.1775Search in Google Scholar
Ordonez, J. C. L. 2014. “Tax Collection, the Informal Sector, and Productivity.” Review of Economic Dynamics 17 (2): 262–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2013.07.004.Search in Google Scholar
Özgür, G., C. Elgin, and A. Y. Elveren. 2021. “Is Informality a Barrier to Sustainable Development?” Sustainable Development 29 (1): 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2130.Search in Google Scholar
Pang, J., H. Mu, and M. Zhang. 2020. “Interaction between Shadow Economy and Pollution: Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of Northeast China.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (17): 21353–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08641-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Qayyum, U., S. Sabir, and S. Anjum. 2021. “Urbanization, Informal Economy, and Ecological Footprint Quality in South Asia.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (47): 67011–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15111-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Rapsikevicius, J., J. Bruneckiene, M. Lukauskas, and S. Mikalonis. 2021. “The Impact of Economic Freedom on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from European Countries.” Sustainability 13 (4): 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042380.Search in Google Scholar
Razmi, M. J., M. A. Falahi, and S. Montazeri. 2013. “Institutional Quality and Underground Economy of 51 OIC Member Countries.” Universal Journal of Management and Social Sciences 3 (2): 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Ruzek, W. 2014. “The Informal Economy as a Catalyst for Sustainability.” Sustainability 7 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010023.Search in Google Scholar
Saunoris, J. W. 2018. “Is the Shadow Economy a Bane or Boon for Economic Growth?” Review of Development Economics 22 (1): 115–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12332.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, F. 2005. “Shadow Economies Around the World: what Do We Really Know?” European Journal of Political Economy 21 (3): 598–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.10.002.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, F. 2008. “The Shadow Economy in Germany: a Blessing or a Curse for the Official Economy?” Economic Analysis and Policy 38 (1): 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0313-5926(08)50008-7.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, F. 2011. Handbook on the Shadow Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9780857930880Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, F., and D. H. Enste. 2000. “Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences.” Journal of Economic Literature 38 (1): 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.1.77.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, F., and B. Hametner. 2014. “The Shadow Economy in Colombia: Size and Effects on Economic Growth.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 20 (2): 293–325. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2013-0059.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, F., A. Buehn, and C. E. Montenegro. 2010. “New Estimates for the Shadow Economies All over the World.” International Economic Journal 24 (4): 443–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2010.525974.Search in Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1988. “Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content.” European Economic Review 32 (2–3): 269–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0.Search in Google Scholar
Seo, M. H., and Y. Shin. 2016. “Dynamic Panels with Threshold Effect and Endogeneity.” Journal of Econometrics 195 (2): 169–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.005.Search in Google Scholar
Tedds, L. M., and D. E. Giles. 2002. “Taxes and the Canadian Underground Economy.” In Taxes and the Canadian Underground Economy, Vol 270. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Search in Google Scholar
UN. 2018. “The 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: An Opportunity for Latin America and the Caribbean.” In Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar
Vlachaki, M. 2015. “The Impact of the Shadow Economy on Indirect Tax Revenues.” Economics & Politics 27 (2): 234–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12054.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Z., B. Zhang, and B. Wang. 2018. “Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Human Development Index in Pakistan: Evidence Form Simultaneous Equation Model.” Journal of Cleaner Production 184: 1081–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.260.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, D. F., and F. Schneider. 2019. “Nonlinearity between the shadow economy and level of development”. IMF Working Papers 19/48. International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781484399613.001Search in Google Scholar
Xiao, C., Q. Wang, T. van der Vaart, and D. P. van Donk. 2018. “When Does Corporate Sustainability Performance Pay off? the Impact of Country-Level Sustainability Performance.” Ecological Economics 146: 325–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.025.Search in Google Scholar
Yang, L., C. Lee, and I. P. Chen. 2021. “Threshold Model with a Time-Varying Threshold Based on Fourier Approximation.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 42 (4): 406–30.10.1111/jtsa.12574Search in Google Scholar
Yang, L., and Q. Sun. 2010. “Size of Hidden Economy in China and its Effects on the Income Inequality.” Management World 7 (4): 1–7.Search in Google Scholar
Zaman, G., and Z. Goschin. 2015. “Shadow Economy and Economic Growth in Romania. Cons and Pros.” Procedia Economics and Finance 22: 80–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00229-4.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2021-0099).
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- On determination of the number of factors in an approximate factor model
- Clean energy consumption and economic growth in China: a time-varying analysis
- Panel data models with two threshold variables
- What will drive global economic growth in the digital age?
- On the nonlinear relationships between shadow economy and the three pillars of sustainable development: new evidence from panel threshold analysis
- Tail behaviours of multiple-regime threshold AR models with heavy-tailed innovations
- Stock price prediction using multi-scale nonlinear ensemble of deep learning and evolutionary weighted support vector regression
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- On determination of the number of factors in an approximate factor model
- Clean energy consumption and economic growth in China: a time-varying analysis
- Panel data models with two threshold variables
- What will drive global economic growth in the digital age?
- On the nonlinear relationships between shadow economy and the three pillars of sustainable development: new evidence from panel threshold analysis
- Tail behaviours of multiple-regime threshold AR models with heavy-tailed innovations
- Stock price prediction using multi-scale nonlinear ensemble of deep learning and evolutionary weighted support vector regression