Home Associations of multiple (≥5) chronic conditions among a nationally representative sample of older United States adults with self-reported pain
Article Publicly Available

Associations of multiple (≥5) chronic conditions among a nationally representative sample of older United States adults with self-reported pain

  • David R. Axon ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Daniel Arku
Published/Copyright: September 2, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

The association between an individuals’ demographic and health characteristics and the presence of multiple chronic conditions is not well known among older United States (US) adults. This study aimed to identify the prevalence and associations of having multiple chronic conditions among older US adults with self-reported pain.

Methods

This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Study subjects were aged ≥50 years and had self-reported pain in the past four weeks. The outcome variable was multiple (≥5) chronic conditions (vs. <5 chronic conditions). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to identify significant associations between demographic and health characteristics and multiple chronic conditions with significance indicated at an a priori alpha level of 0.05. The complex survey design was accounted for when obtaining nationally-representative estimates.

Results

The weighted population was 57,074,842 US older adults with pain, of which, 66.1% had ≥5 chronic conditions. In fully-adjusted analyses, significant associations of ≥5 comorbid chronic conditions included: age 50–64 vs. ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.478, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.391, 0.584); male vs. female gender (AOR=1.271, 95% CI=1.063, 1.519); white vs. other race (AOR=1.220, 95% CI=1.016, 1.465); Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic ethnicity (AOR=0.614, 95% CI=0.475, 0.793); employed vs. unemployed (AOR=0.591, 95% CI=0.476, 0.733); functional limitations vs. no functional limitations (AOR=1.862, 95% CI=1.510, 2.298); work limitations vs. no work limitations (AOR=1.588, 95% CI=1.275, 1.976); little/moderate vs. quite a bit/extreme pain (AOR=0.732, 95% CI=0.599, 0.893); and excellent/very good (AOR=0.375, 95% CI=0.294, 0.480) or good (AOR=0.661, 95% CI=0.540, 0.810) vs. fair/poor physical health.

Conclusions

Approximately 38 million of the 57 million US older adults with pain in this study had ≥5 chronic conditions in 2017. Several characteristics were associated with multiple chronic conditions, which may be important for health care professionals to consider when working with patients to manage their pain.

This study was approved by The University of Arizona Institutional Review Board (2006721124, June 12, 2020).

Introduction

The proportion of older adults in the population is increasing globally and within the United States (US), in part due to increasing life expectancy [1]. This leads to a corresponding increase in the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among older adults [2], [3], [4]. Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) indicated that the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions (i.e., ≥1 chronic condition) among US adults was 21.8% in 2001 and had increased to 26.0% in 2010 [5], while another study also using NHIS data indicated the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions was 25.5% in 2012 [5]. Recent estimates indicate that over half (52%) of US adults have at least one chronic condition, and approximately 27% had ≥2 chronic conditions in 2018 [6]. The presence of multiple chronic conditions in an individual, particularly among older adults, is an important public health topic given that chronic conditions can lead to functional impairment in later-life, which is a significant determinant of healthcare resource use such as medical and social services [7, 8], and mortality [9].

Pain, defined by the International Association for the study of pain (IASP) as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage” [10], is also prevalent, ranging from 24 to 72% in previous studies [11], [12], [13]. Pain can have detrimental effects on an individual’s quality of life [10] and is often reported as an underlying disability among older adults [14]. Pain can be burdensome to manage, as individuals often have to use several strategies to manage pain [15, 16].

Various demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and race have been shown to be associated to various degrees with pain [17], however the association of a more comprehensive set of personal characteristics on pain among individuals with pain and chronic conditions is not well known. Further research to assess the association between individual characteristics and multimorbidity among older adults is therefore needed, in order to determine appropriate clinical and public health policy needs [18], [19], [20]. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics associated with the presence of multiple (≥5) chronic conditions among community-dwelling older United States adults with self-reported pain.

Methods

Study design and data source

This study employed a retrospective, cross-sectional design, and utilized the most current data from the 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Household Component. MEPS uses the sampling framework from the previous years’ National Health Interview Survey and involves a panel design to collect five rounds of data over two years. The MEPS 2017 full-year consolidated data file includes data for each person in the households surveyed, such as demographics, employment and income details, health insurance coverage, health conditions and health status, healthcare utilization and costs, and access and satisfaction with healthcare. This file also provides weighting variables to calculate nationally representative estimates of the non-institutionalized US population [21, 22].

Eligibility criteria

Eligible subjects were community-dwelling adults alive for the full year, age ≥50 years, and had pain in the past four weeks (determined by a response of “a little bit”, “moderate”, “quite a bit”, or “extreme”, when asked: “during the past four weeks, pain interfered with normal work outside the home and housework”) [23, 24].

Variables

Variables were organized into one of five categories according to Andersen’s Behavioral Model (predisposing, enabling, personal health practices, external environmental, need factors) [25].

Predisposing factors included: age (50–64, ≥65 years); gender (male, female); ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic); and race (white, other).

Enabling factors included: education completed (high school or less, more than high school); employment status (employed, unemployed); income level (poor/near poor/low income [<200% federal poverty level], middle/high income [≥200% federal poverty level]); insurance coverage (private, public, uninsured); and marital status (married, other).

Personal health practices included: exercise status (yes, no) and current smoker status (yes, no).

The only external environmental factor was census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West).

Need factors included: instrumental activity of daily living limitations (yes, no); activity of daily living limitations (yes, no); functional limitations (yes, no); work limitations (yes, no); pain severity (little/moderate, quite a bit/extreme); perceived mental health status (excellent/very good, good, fair/poor); and perceived physical health status (excellent/very good, good, fair/poor) [23, 24].

Outcome variable

The outcome variable in this study was chronic conditions. The list of chronic conditions included: angina, arthritis, asthma, cancer, chronic bronchitis, coronary heart disease, diabetes, joint pain, emphysema, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, myocardial infarction, other unspecified heart disease, and stroke. These conditions are collected in MEPS due to their relatively high prevalence in the population and the availability of generally accepted clinical standards for managing these conditions. For every subject, the presence of each condition was determined, summed, and then dichotomized as either multiple (≥5) or few (<5) chronic conditions for analysis. Five conditions was chosen as the threshold for groups because it allowed comparison of individuals with several conditions vs. those with few chronic conditions, and allowed better balanced groups compared to a threshold of, for example, two conditions (which may also be defined as multiple chronic conditions, yet highly prevalent among this population of older adults with pain) [23, 24].

Data analysis

Data for the two groups were summarized and compared using chi-square tests. Hierarchical logistic regression models assessed the association of each variable with ≥5 chronic conditions, with <5 conditions serving as the reference group. This process started with the predisposing group of variables and then adding further groups of variables from least modifiable to most modifiable factors (i.e., enabling, personal health practices, external environmental, and need factors) to successive models. An alpha level of 0.05 was set a priori. Analyses were conducted using SAS Studio (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Figure 1 outlines the subject selection process. From the 31,880 subjects available in the 2017 MEPS dataset, 5,076 were eligible for this study (≥5 chronic conditions=1,766, <5 chronic conditions=3,310). This represented a weighted population of 57,074,842, of which 19,372,008 or 33.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]=32.2, 35.6) had ≥5 chronic conditions and 37,702,833 or 66.1% (95% CI=64.4, 67.8%) had <5 chronic conditions.

Figure 1: 
          Subject selection process.
Figure 1:

Subject selection process.

Table 1 outlines the characteristics of study subjects. Approximately half (51%) the subjects were aged ≥65 years, and the majority were: female (55%), non-Hispanic (90%), white (81%), educated beyond high school (51%), unemployed (61%), had middle/high income (68%), private insurance coverage (61%), married (57%), had no IADLs (91%), no ADLs (95%), no functional limitations (61%), no work limitations (73%), little/moderate severity pain (75%), excellent/very good perceived mental health (52%), excellent/very good/good perceived physical health (73%), did not do regular exercise (58%), and did not smoke (85%). The most common census region was the south (38%). There were differences between those who had ≥5 chronic conditions and those who had <5 chronic conditions for all characteristics (p<0.05) except gender (p=0.5578), race (p=0.5296), and smoking status (p=0.2949).

Table 1:

Characteristics of United States older adults (age ≥50 years) with self-reported pain in the past four weeks stratified by ≥5 chronic conditions vs. <5 chronic conditions.

Variables Total (weighted n=57,074,842) ≥5 chronic conditions (weighted n=19,372,008) <5 chronic conditions (weighted n=37,702,833) p-Value
Weighted % (95% confidence interval) Weighted % (95% confidence interval) Weighted % (95% confidence interval)
Predisposing factors
Age, years <0.0001
 50–64 49.0 (47.0, 51.0) 34.9 (31.8, 38.0) 56.2 (54.0, 58.5)
 ≥65 51.0 (49.0, 53.0) 65.1 (62.0, 68.2) 43.8 (41.5, 46.0)
Gender 0.5578
 Male 44.8 (43.5, 46.1) 45.5 (42.7, 48.3) 44.4 (42.7, 46.2)
 Female 55.2 (53.9, 56.5) 54.5 (51.7, 57.3) 55.6 (53.8, 57.3)
Ethnicity 0.0001
 Hispanic 10.1 (8.8, 11.4) 7.5 (5.9, 9.1) 11.4 (9.8, 13.0)
 Non-Hispanic 89.9 (88.6, 91.2) 92.5 (90.9, 94.1) 88.6 (87.0, 90.2)
Race 0.5296
 White 81.1 (79.5, 82.7) 81.7 (79.4, 83.9) 80.9 (79.0, 82.7)
 Other 18.9 (17.3, 20.5) 18.3 (16.1, 20.6) 19.1 (17.3, 21.0)
Enabling factors
Education completed <0.0001
 High school or less 49.3 (47.2, 51.3) 53.8 (50.8, 56.9) 46.9 (44.6, 49.2)
 More than high school 50.7 (48.7, 52.8) 46.2 (43.1, 49.2) 53.1 (50.8, 55.4)
Employment status <0.0001
 Employed 39.0 (36.8, 41.2) 19.9 (17.0, 22.9) 48.8 (46.4, 51.1)
 Unemployed 61.0 (58.8, 63.2) 80.1 (77.1, 83.0) 51.2 (48.9, 53.6)
Income level <0.0001
 Poor/near poor/low income 32.2 (30.3, 34.2) 41.0 (37.6, 44.4) 27.7 (25.8, 29.7)
 Middle/high income 67.8 (65.8, 69.7) 59.0 (55.6, 62.4) 72.3 (70.3, 74.2)
Insurance coverage <0.0001
 Private 61.0 (59.1, 62.9) 52.8 (49.5, 56.0) 65.2 (63.2, 67.2)
 Public 35.4 (33.6, 37.3) 44.8 (41.6, 48.0) 30.6 (28.7, 32.5)
 Uninsured 3.6 (2.9, 4.2) 2.5 (1.6, 3.4) 4.1 (3.3, 4.9)
Marital status <0.0001
 Married 57.2 (55.1, 59.2) 51.2 (48.0, 54.4) 60.2 (57.9, 62.6)
 Other 42.8 (40.8, 44.9) 48.8 (45.6, 52.0) 39.8 (37.4, 42.1)
Need factors
IADL <0.0001
 Yes 9.1 (8.1, 10.2) 15.6 (13.5, 17.7) 5.8 (4.8, 6.9)
 No 90.9 (89.8, 91.9) 84.4 (82.3, 86.5) 94.2 (93.1, 95.2)
ADL <0.0001
 Yes 5.1 (4.4, 5.8) 8.6 (7.0, 10.1) 3.4 (2.6, 4.1)
 No 94.9 (94.2, 95.6) 91.4 (89.9, 93.0) 96.6 (95.9, 97.4)
Functional limitation <0.0001
 Yes 39.3 (37.5, 41.1) 60.4 (57.5, 63.2) 28.5 (26.5, 30.5)
 No 60.7 (58.9, 62.5) 39.6 (36.8, 42.5) 71.5 (69.5, 73.5)
Work limitation <0.0001
 Yes 26.8 (25.1, 28.6) 44.9 (41.9, 48.0) 17.5 (15.9, 19.1)
 No 73.2 (71.4, 74.9) 55.1 (52.0, 58.1) 82.5 (80.9, 84.1)
Pain severity <0.0001
 Little/moderate 75.0 (73.3, 76.8) 61.3 (58.1, 64.5) 82.1 (80.4, 83.7)
 Quite a bit/extreme 25.0 (23.2, 26.7) 38.7 (35.5, 41.9) 17.9 (16.3, 19.6)
Perceived mental health status <0.0001
 Excellent/very good 52.0 (50.1, 53.9) 41.2 (38.2, 44.3) 57.6 (55.4, 59.8)
 Good 33.5 (31.8, 35.3) 37.9 (35.0, 40.8) 31.3 (29.3, 33.3)
 Fair/poor 14.5 (13.3, 15.6) 20.9 (18.7, 23.1) 11.2 (10.0, 12.4)
Perceived physical health status <0.0001
 Excellent/very good 35.5 (33.9, 37.2) 21.0 (18.8, 23.2) 43.0 (40.9, 45.1)
 Good 37.5 (35.9, 39.0) 37.4 (34.6, 40.2) 37.5 (35.5, 39.4)
 Fair/poor 27.0 (25.5, 28.5) 41.6 (39.0, 44.3) 19.5 (17.9, 21.1)
Personal health practices factors
Exercise <0.0001
 Yes 41.9 (40.0, 43.7) 33.7 (31.1, 36.2) 46.1 (43.8, 48.4)
 No 58.1 (56.3, 60.0) 66.3 (63.8, 68.9) 53.9 (51.6, 56.2)
Smoker 0.2949
 Yes 14.9 (13.8, 16.0) 15.7 (13.9, 17.5) 14.5 (13.0, 15.9)
 No 85.1 (84.0, 86.2) 84.3 (82.5, 86.1) 85.5 (84.1, 87.0)
External environmental factors
Census region 0.0073
 Northeast 18.2 (16.5, 19.8) 16.8 (14.5, 19.1) 18.9 (17.0, 20.7)
 Midwest 22.1 (20.3, 23.9) 21.9 (19.0, 24.8) 22.2 (20.3, 24.1)
 South 38.2 (36.1, 40.3) 42.0 (38.4, 45.6) 36.3 (34.0, 38.6)
 West 21.5 (19.7, 23.4) 19.3 (16.4, 22.1) 22.7 (20.7, 24.7)
  1. Analysis based on an unweighted sample of n=5,076 (≥5 chronic conditions n=1,766; <5 chronic conditions n=3,310) United States adults alive during the calendar year 2017, age ≥50 years, with self-reported pain in the past four weeks. Statistically significant differences between groups based on chi-square tests. IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; ADL, activities of daily living.

Table 2 reports the weighted percentage of subjects who had each type of chronic condition. The most common chronic conditions were hypertension (87.4%, 95% CI=85.9%, 88.9%), joint pain (71.4%, 95% CI=69.7%, 73.1%), arthritis (62.1%, 95% CI=60.3%, 63.8%), and hypercholesterolemia (57.0%, 95% CI=55.3%, 58.8%).

Table 2:

Weighted percentage of each chronic condition present among older United States adults (age ≥50 years) with pain in the past four weeks.

Chronic condition Weighted percentage (95% confidence interval)
Hypertension 87.4 (85.9, 88.9)
Joint pain 71.4 (69.7, 73.1)
Arthritis 62.1 (60.3, 63.8)
Hypercholesterolemia 57.0 (55.3, 58.8)
Diabetes 24.1 (22.6, 25.6)
Other heart disease/condition 22.3 (20.7, 24.0)
Cancer 22.2 (20.7, 23.7)
Asthma 14.5 (13.4, 15.6)
Coronary heart disease 13.6 (12.4, 14.8)
Myocardial infarction 9.6 (8.6, 10.6)
Stroke 9.4 (8.5, 10.3)
Emphysema 6.4 (5.6, 7.3)
Angina 5.7 (4.9, 6.5)
Chronic bronchitis 4.7 (4.0, 5.4)
  1. Analysis based on an unweighted sample of n=5,076 (≥5 chronic conditions n=1,766; <5 chronic conditions n=3,310) United States adults alive during the calendar year 2017, age ≥50 years, with self-reported pain in the past four weeks.

Table 3 displays the results of the hierarchical logistic regression analyses and indicates the factors that were predictors of ≥5 chronic conditions. Results are presented for each level of the analysis (i.e., models 1–5). In the fully adjusted analysis (model 5), all of the predisposing factors were predictors of a subject having ≥5 chronic conditions; those aged ≥65 years (vs. 50–64 years), males (vs. females), non-Hispanic (vs. Hispanic ethnicity), and white (vs other race) were associated with greater odds of having ≥5 chronic conditions. Employment status was the only enabling factor associated with ≥5 chronic conditions; those who were unemployed (vs. employed) were associated with greater odds of having ≥5 chronic conditions.

Table 3:

Predictive characteristics of ≥5 chronic conditions among older United States adults (age ≥50 years) with pain in the past four weeks from hierarchical logistic regression analyses.

Effect Model 1 AOR (95% CI) Model 2 AOR (95% CI) Model 3 AOR (95% CI) Model 4 AOR (95% CI) Model 5 AOR (95% CI)
Predisposing factors
Age 50–64 vs. ≥65 years 0.421 (0.361, 0.490) 0.658 (0.549, 0.789) 0.636 (0.527, 0.767) 0.637 (0.528, 0.767) 0.478 (0.391, 0.584)
Male vs. female sex 1.070 (0.921, 1.243) 1.209 (1.031, 1.419) 1.280 (1.085, 1.509) 1.278 (1.084, 1.507) 1.271 (1.063, 1.519)
Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic 0.664 (0.521, 0.844) 0.586 (0.459, 0.748) 0.577 (0.453, 0.734) 0.592 (0.463, 0.757) 0.614 (0.475, 0.793)
White vs. other race 1.018 (0.861, 1.205) 1.199 (1.012, 1.421) 1.214 (1.021, 1.443) 1.225 (1.029, 1.459) 1.220 (1.016, 1.465)
Enabling factors
Up to high school vs. higher than high school education completed 1.097 (0.940, 1.280) 1.097 (0.939, 1.281) 1.085 (0.927, 1.269) 1.009 (0.854, 1.193)
Employed vs. unemployed employment status 0.360 (0.294, 0.441) 0.373 (0.304, 0.458) 0.372 (0.303, 0.457) 0.591 (0.476, 0.733)
Poor/near poor/low income vs. middle/high income 1.278 (1.067, 1.531) 1.271 (1.062, 1.520) 1.250 (1.047, 1.492) 1.083 (0.898, 1.307)
Private vs. uninsured health insurance coverage 1.019 (0.645, 1.611) 1.034 (0.649, 1.648) 1.057 (0.654, 1.709) 1.068 (0.625, 1.826)
Public vs. uninsured health insurance coverage 1.125 (0.717, 1.765) 1.127 (0.715, 1.775) 1.165 (0.730, 1.860) 0.965 (0.570, 1.635)
Married vs. other marital status 0.804 (0.679, 0.951) 0.802 (0.673, 0.957) 0.801 (0.670, 0.956) 0.914 (0.761, 1.098)
Personal health practices factors
Exercise yes vs. no 0.666 (0.575, 0.772) 0.670 (0.578, 0.777) 0.888 (0.760, 1.038)
Smoker yes vs. no 1.106 (0.908, 1.346) 1.098 (0.900, 1.338) 0.989 (0.809, 1.209)
External environmental factors
Northeast vs. West census region 0.994 (0.787, 1.254) 1.040 (0.818, 1.323)
Midwest vs. West census region 1.149 (0.921, 1.433) 1.094 (0.861, 1.391)
South vs. West census region 1.247 (1.005, 1.548) 1.191 (0.948, 1.496)
Need factors
IADL limitation yes vs. no 1.160 (0.816, 1.648)
ADL limitation yes vs. no 0.803 (0.520, 1.241)
Functional limitation yes vs. no 1.862 (1.510, 2.298)
Work limitation yes vs. no 1.588 (1.275, 1.976)
Little/moderate vs. quite a bit/extreme pain severity 0.732 (0.599, 0.893)
Excellent/very good vs. fair/poor perceived mental health status 1.069 (0.815, 1.401)
Good vs. fair/poor perceived mental health status 1.043 (0.821, 1.324)
Excellent/very good vs. fair/poor perceived physical health status 0.375 (0.294, 0.480)
Good vs. fair/poor perceived physical health status 0.661 (0.540, 0.810)
  1. Logistic regression analysis based on an unweighted sample of n=5,076 (≥5 chronic conditions n=1,766; <5 chronic conditions n=3,310) United States adults alive during the calendar year 2017, age ≥50 years, with self-reported pain in the past four weeks. The reference group was <5 chronic conditions. Model 1 was adjusted for predisposing factors, model 2 was adjusted for predisposing and enabling factors, model 3 was adjusted for predisposing, enabling, and personal health practices factors, model 4 was adjusted for predisposing, enabling, personal health practices, and external environmental factors, model 5 was adjusted for predisposing, enabling, personal health practices, external environmental, and need factors. The models had the following c-statistics: Model 1=0.613, Model 2=0.678, Model 3=0.692, Model 4=0.694, Model 5=0.758. All models had a Wald value of p<0.0001. AOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; ADL, activities of daily living. Bold indicates the characteristic is a significant predictor of ≥5 chronic conditions.

Among need factors, functional and work limitations were associated with higher likelihood of having ≥5 chronic conditions, while little/moderate pain severity (vs. quite a bit/extreme pain severity), and excellent/very good and good (vs. fair/poor) perceived physical health status were associated with lower likelihood of having ≥5 chronic conditions.

None of the personal health practices or external environmental factors were predictors of ≥5 chronic conditions. The fully adjusted logistic regression model had a Wald statistic of <0.0001 and a c-statistic of 0.758.

Discussion

This study first reports the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions and then the associations of multiple chronic conditions among the increasing community-dwelling older adult US population.

Published prevalence estimates of multiple chronic conditions vary widely due to variations in definitions and measurements, population characteristics, study sample sizes, and sampling methods [26]. The current study used nationally representative data of the community-dwelling US older adult population with self-reported pain, and found that the overall prevalence of multiple (≥5) chronic conditions was 33.9% (95% CI=32.2, 35.6). That approximately one-third of the community-dwelling US older adult population with pain also have at least five other chronic conditions indicates the scale of the healthcare challenge to help these individuals manage all of their conditions, including pain, and obtain optimal health outcomes.

This study then found several factors were statistically associated with multiple chronic conditions among older community-dwelling US adults with self-reported pain, which are each addressed below.

All of the predisposing factors (age, gender, ethnicity, race) were statistically associated with multiple chronic conditions in the fully adjusted analyses. These findings add to the literature that assesses the association of such factors among older adults with pain. For instance, community-dwelling US adults aged 50–64 years with pain had lower odds of having multiple chronic conditions compared to adults who were ≥65 years. This finding is consistent with other studies reporting strong associations between age and multiple chronic conditions [27], [28], [29]. However, this phenomenon is not limited to community-dwelling older adults in the US; for example, a study from Canada reported the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions increased with age among middle-aged adults [30]. The current study found males, Whites, and non-Hispanics had greater odds of having multiple chronic conditions than females, other races, and Hispanics respectively. The associations of these variables with chronic conditions differs in the literature, for example, one previous study among US adults aged 20 years and older found that the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions was greater among those aged ≥65 years vs. those aged 45–65 and 20–44 years, greater among women than men, and greater among Whites and Blacks than those who were Hispanic or another race [31]. Furthermore, another study found that the prevalence and mortality of chronic conditions varies between genders and races in the US population, for example, there are more cases of women admitted to hospital with asthma than men, and a higher mortality rate from asthma among non-Hispanic Blacks [32]. While it is not possible to modify these predisposing factors, it can nevertheless be useful to know how they are associated with the presence of multiple chronic conditions among older adults and may assist healthcare professionals when considering the holistic care of these patients and reducing health disparities.

Employment status was the only enabling factor associated with multiple chronic conditions in the current study. Older employed community-dwelling US adults had lower odds of multiple chronic conditions than those who were unemployed. This finding supports previous studies that found a relationship between employment status and multiple chronic conditions, specifically departure from the workforce due to multiple chronic conditions [33], [34], [35]. This finding therefore supports the notion that those with multiple chronic conditions may be unable to work. The association of employment status and multiple chronic conditions may also be explained, at least partially, by resiliency, which is associated with work engagement behaviors among older workers [34].

Several need factors were associated with multiple chronic conditions. The presence of functional and work limitations was associated with greater odds of multiple chronic conditions. A similar study using 2017 MEPS data found that older adults with pain and fewer chronic conditions had a lower likelihood of reporting functional limitations than those with ≥5 chronic conditions [36]. This finding also corresponds with previous work that found individuals with more chronic conditions become functionally impaired earlier than persons with fewer chronic conditions [37]. This finding adds to existing evidence of the association between the prevalence of limitations and multiple chronic conditions among older adults with pain, and given that both limitations and multiple chronic conditions are associated with poorer health outcomes, could be a good factor to target for healthcare interventions in order to improve health outcomes.

In terms of pain severity, the current study found that community-dwelling US older adults who reported little/moderate pain had lower odds of having multiple chronic conditions than those who reported quite a bit/extreme pain. This is an unsurprising finding given that individuals with pain generally suffer from poorer health compared to those who do not have pain [38], [39], [40]. Recent studies from Europe have described how older adults with multimorbidity also have chronic persistent pain [41, 42], while another study from Canada using data from 2006 to 2016 found that each additional comorbid condition was associated with an 8% increase in the odds of reporting pain [43].

Finally, community-dwelling US older adults who reported their health as excellent/very good/good had lower odds of having multiple chronic conditions than those who described their health as fair/poor. This finding concurs with a European study that found increased number of comorbid conditions was associated with a greater likelihood of an individual reporting fair or poor health [44]. Similar findings have been reported in recent studies from Brazil [45], Canada [46], and Denmark [47], thus this study adds data for the US older adult population with pain. These aforementioned need factors may be the easiest modifiable targets for healthcare interventions to improve chronic condition management, pain management, and ultimately health outcomes in this population.

The findings from this study provide additional evidence that greater efforts are needed to help manage and improve the health of older adults with pain from both a clinical and public health perspective. For example, greater interdisciplinary coordination between healthcare professionals may help improve pain management among this population. In addition, perhaps a greater emphasis on disease prevention and health promotion efforts may help prevent or reduce the prevalence of pain among older adults. Finally, from a research perspective, further work is needed that incorporates patient populations with multiple diagnoses that can affect pain, in order to improve our understanding of the factors that influence pain, how to prevent pain, and how to manage pain in these populations.

This study had some limitations. First, multiple chronic conditions were defined as ≥5 conditions, whereas alternative definitions may have led to different results. Second, two of the conditions included are well-known pain diagnoses (arthritis and joint pain), which may have influenced the association between chronic conditions and pain. Third, this study did not account for how well the conditions were controlled (i.e., it only accounted for the presence of the condition). Fourth, data were self-reported, which may have over- or under-estimated the true prevalence of chronic conditions and pain. Finally, this was a cross sectional study that was unable to ascertain causality (i.e., only statistical associations could be identified). Future studies using prospective or longitudinal designs are warranted to assess this relationship over time.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides insight into the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among a nationally representative sample of older US adults, and identifies individual factors that are significant predictors of multiple chronic conditions in this population. The results from this study re-affirms the need for further attention to older adult’s health care, which is increasingly important given population growth among older adults nationally and globally.


Corresponding author: David R. Axon, PhD, MPharm, MS, Assistant Professor, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, 1295 N Martin Ave, P.O. Box 210202, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. Phone: +1(520)621-5961, Fax: +1(520)626-7355, E-mail:

This research has previously been presented virtually at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) European meeting in December 2020 (URL: https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(20)34233-9/pdf).


  1. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as amended in 2013), and has been approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board (IRB #2006721124).

References

1. Roberts, AW, Ogunwole, SU. The population 65 years and older in the United States: 2016. American Community Survey Reports; 2018. Available from: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2018/acs/ACS-38.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2021].Search in Google Scholar

2. Schneider, KM, O’Donnell, BE, Dean, D. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions in the United States’ Medicare population. Health Qual Life Outcome 2009;7:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-82.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Older Americans 2016 – key indicators of well-being federal interagency forum on aging-related statistics 2016. Available from: https://agingstats.gov/docs/LatestReport/Older-Americans-2016-Key-Indicators-of-WellBeing.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2021].Search in Google Scholar

4. Vogeli, C, Shields, AE, Lee, TA, Gibson, TB, Marder, WD, Weiss, KB, et al.. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:391–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Ward, BW, Schiller, JS. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:120203.10.5888/pcd10.120203Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Boersma, P, Black, LI, Ward, BW. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults, 2018. Prev Chronic Dis 2020;17:E106. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200130.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Van den Akker, M, Buntinx, F, Knottnerus, JA. Comorbidity or multimorbidity: what’s in a name? A review of literature. Eur J Gen Pract 1996;2:65–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814789609162146.Search in Google Scholar

8. Patel, KV, Guralnik, JM, Dansie, EJ, Turk, DC. Prevalence and impact of pain among older adults in the United States: findings from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study. Pain 2013;154:2649–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Zheng, DD, Loewenstein, DA, Christ, SL, Feaster, DJ, Lam, BL, McCollister, KE, et al.. Multimorbidity patterns and their relationship to mortality in the US older adult population. PLoS One 2021;16:e0245053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245053.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Raja, SN, Carr, BC, Cohen, M, Finnerup, NB, Flor, H, Gibson, S, et al.. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges and compromises. Pain 2020;161:1976–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Andersson, HI, Ejlertsson, G, Leden, I, Rosenberg, C. Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class, and pain localization. Clin J Pain 1993;9:174–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199309000-00004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Bassols, A, Bosch, F, Campillo, M, Canellas, M, Banos, JE. An epidemiological comparison of pain complaints in the general population of Catalonia (Spain) Pain. 1999;83:9–16 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00069-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Helme, RD, Gibson, SJ. The epidemiology of pain in elderly people. Clin Geriatr Med 2001;17:417–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0690(05)70078-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ettinger, WH, Fried, LP, Harris, T, Shemanski, L, Schulz, R, Robbins, J. Self-reported causes of physical disability in older people: the cardiovascular health study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:1035–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06206.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Axon, DR, Bhattacharjee, S, Warholak, TL, Slack, MK. Xm2 scores for estimating total exposure to multimodal strategies identified by pharmacists for managing pain: validity testing and clinical relevance. Pain Res Manag 2018; Article 2530286. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2530286.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Axon, DR, Patel, MJ, Martin, JR, Slack, MK. Use of multidomain management strategies by community dwelling adults with chronic pain: evidence from a systematic review. Scand J Pain 2019;19:9–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0306.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Wandner, LD, Scipio, CD, Hirsh, AT, Torres, CA, Robinson, ME. The perception of pain in others: how gender, race, and age influence pain expectations. J Pain 2012;13:220–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.10.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Anderson, GF. Medicare and chronic conditions. N Engl J Med 2005;353:305–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb044133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Fuster, V, Voute, J. MDGs: chronic diseases are not on the agenda. Lancet 2005;366:1512–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67610-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Norris, SL, High, K, Gill, TM, Hennessy, S, Kutner, JS, Reuben, DB, et al.. Health care for older Americans with multiple chronic conditions: a research agenda. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:149–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01530.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Survey background. Available from: https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/about_meps/survey_back.jsp [Accessed 25 May 2021].Search in Google Scholar

22. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Download data files, documentation, and codebooks. Available from: https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/download_data_files.jsp [Accessed 25 May 2021].Search in Google Scholar

23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. MEPS HC-201 2017 full year consolidated data codebook. Available from: https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h201/h201cb.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2021].Search in Google Scholar

24. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. MEPS HC-201 2017 full year consolidated data file. Available from: https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h201/h201doc.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2021].Search in Google Scholar

25. Andersen, RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:1–10.10.2307/2137284Search in Google Scholar

26. Fortin, M, Stewart, M, Poitras, ME, Almirall, MD, Maddocks, H. A systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity: toward a more uniform methodology. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:142–51. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1337.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Akner, G. Analysis of multimorbidity in individual elderly nursing home residents. Development of a multimorbidity matrix. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009;49:413–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.12.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Marengoni, A, Rizzuto, D, Wang, HX, Winblad, B, Fratiglioni, L. Patterns of chronic multimorbidity in the elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:225–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02109.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Schafer, I, von Leitner, EC, Schon, G, Koller, D, Hansen, H, Kolonko, T, et al.. Multimorbidity patterns in the elderly: a new approach of disease clustering identifies complex interrelations between chronic conditions. PLoS One 2010;5:e15941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015941.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Sakib, MN, Shooshtari, S, St. John, P, Menec, V. The prevalence of multimorbidity and associations with lifestyle factors among middle-aged Canadians: an analysis of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging data. BMC Publ Health 2019;19:243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6567-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. King, DE, Xiang, J, Pilkerton, CS. Multimorbidity trends in United States adults, 1988–2014. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:503–13. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.180008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Raghupathi, W, Raghupathi, V. An empirical study of chronic diseases in the United States: a visual analytics approach. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2018;15:431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030431.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Bound, J, Schoenbaum, M, Stinebrickner, TR, Waidmann, T. The dynamic effects of health on the labor force transitions of older workers. Lab Econ 1999;6:179–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(99)00015-9.Search in Google Scholar

34. Jason, KJ, Carr, DC, Washington, TR, Hilliard, TS, Mingo, CA. Multiple chronic conditions, resilience, and workforce transitions in later life: a socio-ecological model. Gerontol 2017;57:269–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Schofield, DJ, Callander, EJ, Shrestha, RN, Passey, ME, Percival, R, Kelly, SJ. The indirect economic impacts of co-morbidities on people with depression. J Psychiatr Res 2013;47:796–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.02.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Axon, DR, Le, D. Association of self-reported functional limitations among a national community-based sample of older United States adults with pain: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med 2021;10:1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091836.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Dunlop, DD, Lyons, JS, Manheim, LM, Song, J, Chang, RW. Arthritis and heart disease as risk factors for major depression: the role of functional limitation. Med Care 2004;42:502–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000127997.51128.81.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Björnsdóttir, SV, Jónsson, SH, Valdimarsdóttir, UA. Functional limitations and physical symptoms of individuals with chronic pain. Scand J Rheumatol 2013;421:59–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2012.697916.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Covinsky, KE, Lindquist, K, Dunlop, DD, Yelin, E. Pain, functional limitations, and aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:1556–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02388.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Lichtenstein, MJ, Dhanda, R, Cornell, JE, Escalante, A, Hazuda, HP. Disaggregating pain and its effect on physical functional limitations. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998;53:361–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/53a.5.m361.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Mills, SEE, Nicolson, KP, Smith, BH. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br J Anaesth 2019;123:e273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Scherer, M, Hansen, H, Gensichen, J, Mergenthal, K, Riedel-Heller, S, Weyerer, S, et al.. Association between multimorbidity patterns and chronic pain in elderly primary care patients: a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract 2016;17:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0468-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Ferguson, M, Svendrovski, A, Katz, J. Association between multimorbid disease patterns and pain outcomes among a complex chronic care population in Canada. J Pain Res 2020;13:3045–57. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S269648.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Palladino, R, Lee, JT, Ashworth, M, Triassi, M, Millett, C. Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilization and health status: evidence from 16 European countries. Age Ageing 2016;45:431–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw044.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Cavalcanti, G, Doring, M, Portella, MR, Bortoluzzi, EC, Mascarelo, A, Dellani, MP. Multimorbidity associated with polypharmacy and negative self-perception of health. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol 2017;20:634–42. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562017020.170059.Search in Google Scholar

46. Fortin, M, Bravo, G, Hudon, C, Lapointe, L, Almirall, J, Dubois, M-F, et al.. Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care. Qual Life Res 2006;15:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8661-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Tang, LH, Thygesen, LC, Willadsen, TG, Jepsen, R, la Cour, K, Frolich, A, et al.. The association between clusters of chronic conditions and psychological well-being in younger and older people-A cross-sectional, population-based study from the Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark. J Comorbidity 2020;10:235042X20981185.https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X20981185.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-05-26
Accepted: 2021-08-10
Published Online: 2021-09-02
Published in Print: 2021-10-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial Comment
  3. When surgery prompts discontinuation of opioids
  4. Systematic Reviews
  5. The efficacy of botulinum toxin A treatment for tension-type or cervicogenic headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials
  6. Pain medication use for musculoskeletal pain among children and adolescents: a systematic review
  7. Topical Review
  8. Erector spinae plane block in acute interventional pain management: a systematic review
  9. Clinical Pain Researches
  10. Maternal haemodynamics during labour epidural analgesia with and without adrenaline
  11. Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Portuguese breakthrough pain assessment tool with cancer patients
  12. Opioid availability statistics from the International Narcotics Control Board do not reflect the medical use of opioids: comparison with sales data from Scandinavia
  13. Granisetron vs. lidocaine injection to trigger points in the management of myofascial pain syndrome: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
  14. Pain experience in an aging adult population during a 10-year follow-up
  15. Pre-sleep cognitive arousal exacerbates sleep disturbance in chronic pain: an exploratory daily diary and actigraphy study
  16. Psychometric assessment of the Swedish version of the injustice experience questionnaire among patients with chronic pain
  17. Exploring how people with chronic pain understand their pain: a qualitative study
  18. Pain, cognition and disability in advanced multiple sclerosis
  19. Disability, burden, and symptoms related to sensitization in migraine patients associate with headache frequency
  20. Observational Studies
  21. Health-related quality of life in tension-type headache: a population-based study
  22. Is this really trigeminal neuralgia? Diagnostic re-evaluation of patients referred for neurosurgery
  23. Does the performance of lower limb peripheral nerve blocks differ among orthopedic sub-specialties? A single institution experience in 246 patients
  24. Risk of infection within 4 weeks of corticosteroid injection (CSI) in the management of chronic pain during a pandemic: a cohort study in 216 patients
  25. Reliability and smallest detectable change of the Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain
  26. Associations of multiple (≥5) chronic conditions among a nationally representative sample of older United States adults with self-reported pain
  27. Original Experimental
  28. Circulating long non-coding RNA signature in knee osteoarthritis patients with postoperative pain one-year after total knee replacement
  29. Educational Case Report
  30. Analgesic effect of paired associative stimulation in a tetraplegic patient with severe drug-resistant neuropathic pain: a case report
  31. Short Communication
  32. Examining resting-state functional connectivity in key hubs of the default mode network in chronic low back pain
  33. Book Review
  34. Emmanuel Bäckryd and Mads U. Werner: Långvarig smärta – SMÄRTMEDICIN VOL. 2
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sjpain-2021-0094/html
Scroll to top button