Startseite Raising awareness about chronic pain and dyspareunia among women – a Swedish survey 8 months after childbirth
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Raising awareness about chronic pain and dyspareunia among women – a Swedish survey 8 months after childbirth

  • Beata Molin ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Anna Sand , Anna-Karin Berger und Susanne Georgsson
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Mai 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background and aims

Although several studies have been conducted, knowledge about chronic pain and dyspareunia after childbirth is still limited. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of chronic pain 8 months after childbirth in a cohort of Swedish women. The characteristics of chronic pain, such as, pain intensity, localization and frequency as well as pain interference with daily activities were examined. An additional aim was to describe the prevalence and intensity of dyspareunia.

Methods

Data were obtained through two self-administered questionnaires and the patient record system, Obstetrix. The first questionnaire was distributed on the maternity ward, 24–36 h after labour, to Swedish-speaking women who had given birth to a living child (n = 1,507). The second questionnaire was sent by post 8 months after childbirth. We collected data about demographic and social characteristics, pain presence and its onset, as well as pain intensity, frequency, bodily localization and pain interference with activities of women’s daily life.

Results

In total, 1,171 (77.7%) responded to both questionnaires and were included in the analysis. Eight months after giving birth, totally 16.7% (195/1,171) of the women reported chronic pain related to childbirth. Of these, 9.1% (106/1,171) of women reported chronic pain with onset during pregnancy, 4.5% (53/1,171) experienced chronic pain with onset following labour and 3.1% (36/1,171) of women had both chronic pain with onset during pregnancy and chronic pain with onset following labour (each participant could only appear in one of the groups). Women reported a lower prevalence of chronic pain after vaginal delivery than caesarean section (61/916, 6.7% vs. 28/255, 11%, p = 0.021, OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.1–2.8). Moreover, 19.2% (211/1,098) of women experienced dyspareunia. There was no difference regarding prevalence of dyspareunia and the mode of delivery. Of those women who had a vaginal delivery, 19.5% (167/858) experienced pain during intercourse and the corresponding number for women after caesarean section was 18.3% (44/240) (p = 0.694, OR 0.929, CI 0.6–1.3). Approximately 80% of women with chronic pain, and 60% of women that experienced dyspareunia, rated their worst pain as moderate or severe (NRS 4–10). The corresponding number regarding average chronic pain was between 50 and 70%. More than 35% of the women with chronic pain scored pain interference with daily activities as ≥4 on a 0–10 NRS.

Conclusions

In our study, chronic pain 8 months after childbirth was reported by one in six women and one in five of the women experienced dyspareunia. The intensity of both chronic pain and dyspareunia was reported as moderate to severe in a significant proportion of women and chronic pain interfered considerably with daily activities.

Implications

There is a need to raise awareness among healthcare providers of this clinical problem as well as to revise and upgrade education regarding pain after childbirth to prevent potential long-term health problems, women’s suffering and increased need for health care. The development of strategies for prevention, follow-up and treatment of pain is warranted. More research, including women’s experiences of pain as well as intervention studies, are also needed.

1 Introduction

Chronic pain is a global health problem among women but there is still little awareness and recognition regarding this issue. Studies have shown that the prevalence of chronic pain is higher among women than men, and that women generally experience more recurrent, more severe and longer lasting pain [1], [2]. Conditions that disproportionately affect women include fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, pelvic pain and migraine headache [3], [4]. Several chronic pain conditions are unique to women’s reproductive organs, including endometriosis and vulvodynia.

Although considered as natural processes, pregnancy and labour often entail pain and tissue damage. Pain occurs in over 70% of pregnancies and the most common pain conditions affecting pregnant women are low back and pelvic girdle pain [5]. Acute pain during labour is experienced by the majority of parturients and is often rated as severe or extremely severe [6]. Furthermore, women suffer from painful injuries during vaginal birth, such as perineal lacerations of different degrees or levator ani muscle lesions as well as tissue damage during caesarean sections [7], [8], [9].

It is well established that an episode of acute pain, for instance, caused by trauma or surgery, may lead to development of chronic pain [10], [11]. Whereas the mechanisms of the transition from acute to chronic pain are still poorly understood, it is known that acute pain can induce maladaptive structural and functional changes in the nervous system. These changes may lead to physical and psychological consequences and, if left untreated, they may become irreversible with time and ultimately refractory to treatment [11], [12]. Chronic pain is a leading source of human suffering and disability [13] and can have negative consequences for individuals, their families, and society. In many cases, chronic pain leads to decreased quality of life and is associated with higher ratings of depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, complicated family relationships, an increased need for health care as well as decreased ability to work [1], [14].

Knowledge about chronic pain and dyspareunia after childbirth is still limited. Estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain following pregnancy or labour vary widely in the literature, from 8.5% to 43% concerning pain related to pregnancy [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] and 0.3%–55% regarding pain persisting after labour [10], [15], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Moreover, the prevalence of dyspareunia after childbirth varied between 8% and 62% in previous studies [25], [26], [27], [28]. Several reasons for this large variation have been discussed, including heterogeneity with respect to study samples, follow-up period as well as that, in many previous studies, the authors did not discriminate between pre-existing pain and new onset of pain. To our knowledge, there are no studies focussing both on chronic pain following pregnancy and labour as well as dyspareunia. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of chronic pain 8 months after childbirth in a cohort of Swedish women. The characteristics of chronic pain, such as pain intensity, localization and frequency as well as pain interference with daily activities were examined. An additional aim was to describe the prevalence and intensity of dyspareunia.

2 Material and methods

2.1 Study design

The present study was conducted as a prospective, multicentre prevalence study.

2.2 Sample and participants

A convenience sample of women who had given birth at one of seven hospitals located in the capital of Sweden, Stockholm (2,239,407 inhabitants) and in two medium-sized cities (with approximately 130,000 and 70,000 inhabitants), was selected. Women were recruited on maternity wards between April and December 2015. All women eligible for participation were invited to participate. The exclusion criteria for the survey were:

  1. Women who did not speak and read Swedish.

  2. Stillbirth (excluded for ethical reasons).

2.3 Measures and definitions

Data were obtained through two self-administered questionnaires. The survey questionnaires were developed by the research team, consisting of pain researchers, midwives and an obstetrician, after a systematic literature review and an in-depth examination of available patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Based on the inspiration of various PROs, the authors developed a set of 82 single item questions to address the research objectives of interest. All single items were tested for clarity, understandability and applicability for the planned study. The survey questionnaires were validated and tested through one-to-one interviews with 15 women. In general, all items were well perceived and easily understood. Only two questions (one question about socioeconomic data and one regarding localisations of pain) had to be modified and reworded. The first questionnaire consisted of questions about demographic and social characteristics, as well as baseline measures of common maternal morbidities, including pain before and during pregnancy. The second questionnaire included questions about pain presence and its onset, as well as pain intensity, frequency, bodily localization and pain interference with activities of women’s daily life. Women were asked whether constant or recurrent pain was present during the past week (yes/no) as well as if the present pain had begun before pregnancy, during pregnancy, in relation to labour or weeks to months after labour. According to the definition of chronic pain and recommendations regarding duration of chronic pain for research purposes [29], [30], we could identify pain with onset during pregnancy or following labour, that was still experienced 8 months after childbirth, as chronic. Dyspareunia was identified by asking the women if they experienced pain during intercourse (yes/no). Women that experienced dyspareunia before pregnancy were excluded from the analysis. For the estimation of the worst and average pain intensity a numerical rating scale, NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, was used, with 0 being “no pain” and 10 being the “worst pain imaginable” [31]. Women were also asked to assess the degree to which pain interfered with seven items: “walking”, “work”, “childcare” and “sleep” (physical functioning) as well as “mood”, “enjoyment of life” and “relations with others” (affective state) [32]. To measure pain interference, NRS ranging from 0 – “no impact” to 10 – “very high impact” was used. Questions about pain interference with daily activities, as well as the response options using an NRS scale, were tested and explored in detail in the pilot study by means of one-to-one interviews. Both pain intensity and interference for each item were transformed into severity stages of “mild,” (NRS 0–3) “moderate,” (NRS 4–6) and “severe” (NRS 7–10) [33]. To describe localization of pain, women were given the following alternatives: in/around vulva, in/around anus, between vulva and anus, surgical site after caesarean section, os coccyx, lower back, upper back, pelvis, abdomen, legs, breasts, head and others. The frequency of pain was assessed by the women choosing one of the following options: constant, daily, a few times a week, a few times a month. If more than one onset of pain was reported, women were asked to describe localization, frequency, intensity and interference of pain with daily activities for every specified pain.

The primary outcome measures were:

  1. The prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain with onset during pregnancy or following labour.

  2. The prevalence and intensity of pain experienced during sexual intercourse (dyspareunia) with onset during pregnancy or after childbirth.

The first questionnaire was distributed by midwives working on the maternity ward and completed by the woman during the first 24–36 h after labour. Prior to data collection, the researcher (BM) visited all the included maternity wards, informed the midwives about the study and gave instructions regarding the distribution of the first questionnaire. Regular contact with the clinics and midwives continued throughout the data collection period April to December 2015. The questionnaires were collected by the researcher (BM) at the hospital and contact details for the women were recorded in a study register. All women who consent to participate in the study, returned the first questionnaire (n=1,580). Seventy-three (4.6%) of these questionnaires were excluded from the study; 69 were lacking personal data which made it impossible to send the second follow-up questionnaire and four of the questionnaires were returned without having been filled in. Distribution continued until 1,507 completed questionnaires were received. The second questionnaire, with a pre-stamped return envelope, was sent by post 8 months after childbirth. Two reminders were sent to those women who did not respond. In total, 1,171 (77.7%) out of 1,507 women completed the second questionnaire and were included in the analysis. In addition to the questionnaires, obstetric data, such as delivery route and parity were obtained from the patient record system, Obstetrix. To assess the representativeness of the sample, the social and reproductive characteristics of participants were compared with routinely collected data for all women giving birth during the recruitment period. Data regarding the general population were obtained from The Swedish Medical Birth Register: Pregnancies, Deliveries and Newborn Infants [9]. These records consist of information from all pregnancies that have led to the delivery of a child. Data regarding perineal trauma degree 1 and 2, age categories as well as occupational status were not available at the time of the study in the register or elsewhere.

2.4 Statistical analysis

A sample size calculation was conducted in order to analyse risk factors regarding pain following labour (data to be published). According to the calculation, 1,000 women should be recruited in order to have a power of 80%, based on a significance level of 5%, to detect differences regarding risk factors of at least 10% between women with, or without, chronic pain. With the support of existing studies [21], [22] the sample size ratio between the no pain group and the pain group was estimated to be nine. Further, the dropout was estimated to be approximately 30%. Therefore, the sample size was determined to be 1,500 women. Descriptive statistics of the collected data are presented as numbers (frequencies) and percentages. Missing data were left out of the analyses and no imputation was performed. Therefore, the numbers of responders included in the analyses vary. Proportions of categorical variables were analysed for statistical significance by using the Pearson Chi-square test. Data were processed and analysed using the statistical program SPSS IBM (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 25.

2.5 Ethical approval

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm, in March 2015 (Reference no 2015/236–31). Verbal and written information about the study was given, and if the woman consented to participate, a written informed consent form was signed.

3 Results

3.1 Participants

In total, 1,171 (77.7%) out of 1,507 women responded to the second questionnaire and were included in the analysis. The characteristics of the responders and general population are presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Characteristics of the sample and general population.

Sample (n=916–1,171)
Swedish birth Mothersa (n=115–235)
Mean SD Mean
Age (year) 32.4 4.5 30.3
n % %

Age groups (year)
19–24 57 4.9 b
25–35 794 67.8 b
36–50 320 27.3 b
Country of birth
 Sweden 1,013 87.1 72.5
 Another European country 72 6.2 9.3
 Country outside Europe 78 6.7 18.2
Relationship status
 Married or cohabiting 1,147 98 93
 Single 15 1.3 7
Education level
 Elementary school 18 1.6 11
 Upper secondary school 250 21.6 36
 College 882 76 53
Occupational status
 Employed 1,048 89.7 b
 Student 46 3.9 b
 Jobseeker 18 1.5 b
 Other 56 4.8 b
Delivery method
 Vaginal 916 78.2 82.6
 Instrumental 75 6.4 7.2
 Spontaneous 841 71.8 75.4
 Caesarean section 255 21.8 17.4
 Emergency 119 10.2 7.9
 Planned 136 11.6 9.4
Perineal traumac
 Degree 1 and 2 738 80.6 b
 Degree 3 and 4 50 5.4 3.1
 Episiotomy 7 0.8 6.2
Parity
 Primipara 685 58.5 43
 Multipara 486 41.5 57
  1. aData from The Swedish Medical Birth Register: Pregnancies, Deliveries and Newborn Infants, 2015 [9].

  2. bData were not available.

  3. cOf those women that had a vaginal delivery (n=916).

3.2 Prevalence of chronic pain after childbirth

Eight months after giving birth, totally 16.7% (195/1,171) of the women reported chronic pain related to childbirth. Of these, 9.1% (106/1,171) of women reported chronic pain with onset during pregnancy, 4.5% (53/1,171) experienced chronic pain with onset following labour and 3.1% (36/1,171) of women had both chronic pain with onset during pregnancy and chronic pain with onset following labour (each participant could only appear in one of the groups). Women reported a lower prevalence of chronic pain after vaginal delivery than caesarean section (61/916, 6.7% vs. 28/255, 11%, p=0.021, OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.1–2.8).

3.3 Characteristics of chronic pain after childbirth

A detailed analysis of characteristics of chronic pain 8 months after childbirth is shown in Table 2 and Figures 13.

Table 2:

Localization of chronic pain reported by women 8 months after childbirth with onset during pregnancy or following labour (more than one localization could be reported).

Localization Pain onset
During pregnancy n=142 (106a+36b)
Following labourc n=89 (53d+36b)
Following vaginal delivery n=61
Following caesarean section n=28
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
In/around vulva 4 (3) 32 (36) 27 (44) 5 (18)
Surgical site after caesarean section 0 (0) 21 (75)e 0 (0) 21 (75)
In/around anus 6 (4) 15 (17) 14 (23) 1 (4)
Os coccyx 28 (20) 14 (16) 12 (20) 2 (7)
Lower back 65 (46) 13 (15) 10 (16) 3 (11)
Pelvis 62 (44) 10 (11) 9 (15) 1 (4)
Abdomen 12 (9) 10 (11) 6 (10) 4 (14)
Between vulva and anus 2 (1) 10 (11) 10 (16) 0 (0)
Legs or feet 21 (15) 3 (3) 3 (5) 0 (0)
Breasts 0 (0) 2 (2) 1 (2) 1 (4)
Upper back 26 (18) 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (4)
Head 17 (12) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Arms or hands 6 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
1 site of pain 80 (56) 62 (70) 41 (67) 21 (75)
2–5 sites of pain 59 (42) 27 (30) 20 (33) 7 (25)
6–8 sites of pain 3 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
  1. aChronic pain with onset during pregnancy.

  2. bBoth chronic pain with onset during pregnancy and chronic pain with onset following labour.

  3. cRegardless of delivery method.

  4. dChronic pain with onset following labour.

  5. eOf those women that had pain following caesarean section.

Figure 1: 
            Frequency of chronic pain 8 months after childbirth following pregnancy (n=137) or labour (n=84).
Figure 1:

Frequency of chronic pain 8 months after childbirth following pregnancy (n=137) or labour (n=84).

Figure 2: 
            Intensity of the worst and average chronic pain 8 months after childbirth following pregnancy (n=137–138) or labour (n=81–83) as well as dyspareunia (n=207) scored on NRS (0–10).
Figure 2:

Intensity of the worst and average chronic pain 8 months after childbirth following pregnancy (n=137–138) or labour (n=81–83) as well as dyspareunia (n=207) scored on NRS (0–10).

Figure 3: 
            Interference of chronic pain, following pregnancy and labour (n=190–192), with daily activities rated on a 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS ranging from 0 – “no impact” to 10 – “very high impact”).
Figure 3:

Interference of chronic pain, following pregnancy and labour (n=190–192), with daily activities rated on a 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS ranging from 0 – “no impact” to 10 – “very high impact”).

3.3.1 Localizations

The lower back and the pelvic area were the most common localizations for chronic pain following pregnancy. Regarding chronic pain with onset in relation to vaginal delivery, women experienced pain most often in/around the vulva and anus followed by pain around the os coccyx. The surgical site was the most prevalent localization of chronic pain after caesarean section (Table 2).

3.3.2 Frequency

Over 40% of the women experienced chronic pain constantly or daily (Figure 1).

3.3.3 Intensity

Approximately 80% of women with chronic pain with onset during pregnancy or in relation to labour scored their worst pain as moderate or severe (NRS 4–10). The corresponding number regarding average pain was between 50 and 70% (Figure 2).

3.3.4 Pain interference with daily activities

The women also evaluated the extent to which their pain interfered with their daily life activities including walking, work, childcare, sleep, mood, enjoyment of life and relations with others. More than 35% of the women rated pain interference with all these items as moderate or severe (4–10 NRS). Almost 60% of the women reported a moderate to severe (7–10 NRS) impact on mood (Figure 3).

3.4 Prevalence and intensity of dyspareunia

Nineteen-point two percent (211/1,098) of women experienced dyspareunia with onset during pregnancy or after labour. There was no difference regarding dyspareunia and the mode of delivery. Of those women that had a vaginal delivery, 19.5% (167/858) experienced pain during intercourse and the corresponding number for women after caesarean section was 18.3% (44/240) (p=0.694, OR 0.929, CI 0.6–1.3). Approximately 60% of women with dyspareunia scored their worst pain during intercourse as moderate or severe (NRS 4–10) (Figure 2).

4 Discussion

The results of our study indicate, that the prevalence of chronic pain after childbirth is lower than of chronic-postsurgical pain, for instance after mastectomy or amputation which may affect up to half of all patients [10], [12]. However, the caesarean and vaginal deliveries are the most common procedures worldwide and even a small percentage represent an impressive number of women. Extrapolation of our findings to the 120,000 deliveries per year in Sweden suggests that approximately 20,000 women are at risk of developing chronic painful conditions following pregnancy and labour [9].

Childbirth is also a risk factor for developing dyspareunia during the postpartum period and potentially in the longer term [25], [26], [27], [28]. In our study, 8 months after childbirth, almost one in five women reported pain during intercourse with onset during or after pregnancy. Previous studies suggest that postpartum dyspareunia may be a result of hormonal changes, such as relative hypoestrogenic state created by breastfeeding. Women, still breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum, had a higher likelihood of experiencing dyspareunia [27], [28]. Pain during intercourse may be also caused by mechanical trauma to the genital region, with ensuing inflammation or pelvic floor muscle dysfunction [26], [27], [28]. However, the findings regarding an association between the prevalence of dyspareunia and perineal trauma, as well as mode of delivery, are equivocal, except for instrumental vaginal deliveries that seem to increase the risk [27]. Our study confirms results showing no association between the prevalence of dyspareunia and the mode of delivery.

Previous studies of chronic pain or dyspareunia after childbirth show a great variability in terms of its prevalence, thus the findings are difficult to interpret and compare. Several reasons for the varied prevalence have been discussed, including heterogeneity with respect to study samples, outcome measures, and follow-up time. An important reason for the varied prevalence may be that many of the previous studies did not specify the onset of pain or did not exclude pre-existing pain [15]. It is also possible that the contributing factor to the different prevalence numbers is the varying time of natural recovery during the first year after the onset of pain. Studies have shown that some injuries demonstrated total or near total resolution up to 1 year after childbirth and that the prevalence of postpartum pain decreased with time [8], [15], [20], [34]. At the same time, some studies have found a relatively high prevalence of chronic pain up to 7 years after childbirth [19], [24], [35], [36]. Some authors suggest, that in most cases, spontaneous recovery from pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain takes place within the first 3 months postpartum and women with pain persisting after this timeframe may have a poor prognosis [17], [34]. These results indicate that at least some pain conditions will not resolve with time in predisposed individuals [37].

In our study, the intensity of both chronic pain and dyspareunia were reported as moderate to severe in a significant proportion of women. In addition, chronic pain interfered considerably with women’s daily activities. The results suggest that pain can negatively affect women’s lives, which is consistent with studies demonstrating that the presence of persistent postpartum pain is associated with a reduced quality of life, higher prevalence of anxiety symptoms and depression compared to women without pain [17], [27], [38]. Moreover, pain can also affect mothers’ ability to care for their children [39]. Individuals with chronic pain are often at risk of developing further complications, including physical and psychological dysfunctions [14]. Chronic pain related to childbirth occurs relatively early in life, which means that the physical, psychological, social and financial consequences, for both individuals as well as society, may be extensive. Because chronic pain has the capacity to be more complex in its pathophysiology and thus potentially more difficult to treat with time [14], we suggest a more active approach to the identification and treatment of pain following childbirth in order to prevent potential long-term health problems, women’s suffering and increased need for health care. There is a need to raise awareness among healthcare providers of this clinical problem, as well as to revise and upgrade education regarding pain prevention and management.

The strengths of our study include the prospective study design, large sample size and the high response rate to the second questionnaire. Another key strength is that we clearly defined onset of chronic pain and excluded pre-existing pain. Further, the questionnaires were developed by an interprofessional and interdisciplinary team with broad competence. All items in both questionnaires seemed to be well perceived and easily understood by all women included in the study. To capture the multidimensionality of the pain experience, we measured recommended core outcomes, including pain intensity and interference with daily activities [32]. We also used valid and reliable instruments, such as NRS, to assess intensity of pain, which is recommended for core outcome measures in chronic pain studies [32]. The use of a Numeric Rating Scale for assessment of pain interference with daily activities was tested and explored in detail in the pilot study and well perceived by all study participants. Hence, the scale was deemed appropriate, valid, and reliable. Taken together, according to our evaluation, the questionnaires demonstrated good face-validity for their intended use, to capture concepts of interest in the target study population including pain intensity and interference with daily activities. The most important limitation of the study is that we were unable to determine a precise response fraction to the first questionnaire. The number of women included in the study constituted a minor proportion of the total number of deliveries at the recruiting hospitals during the data collection period (approximately 17,000) which to some extent could be attributed to the high levels of non-Swedish speaking women in the population. The share of foreign-born mothers in Sweden is reported as 27.5% [9]. Another reason for this limitation is that midwives on the maternity wards often failed to ask women if they would like to participate, due to time constraints, insufficient staffing and excessive workloads. However, the study participants seemed to be representative in relation to obstetric characteristics including mode of delivery, acute vs. elective caesarean sections and instrumental/non-instrumental vaginal deliveries. The recruitment did result in under-representation of younger women, women with lower educational level and foreign-born women with a non-Swedish-speaking background. Studies have shown, that lower educational level and socioeconomic status can be associated with higher prevalence of chronic pain [10], [40]. Therefore, it is possible that the prevalence of chronic pain after childbirth may be generally higher in the general population than among the women included in our study. Thus, the low number of women who filled in the first questionnaire may be a substantial threat to the generalizability of this study.

5 Conclusion

Our study shows that chronic pain 8 months after childbirth was reported by one in six women and one in five of the women experienced dyspareunia. The intensity of both chronic pain as well as dyspareunia was reported as moderate to severe in a significant proportion of women and the chronic pain considerably interfered with women’s daily activities.

  1. Authors’ statements

  2. Research funding: This study was supported by a grant from the Capio Research Foundation (grant no. 2016-2900, 2017-2996) and funding from Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The research related to human use complies with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm.

References

[1] Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287–333.10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Hurley RW, Adams MCB. Sex, gender, and pain: an overview of a complex field. Anesth Analg 2008;107:309–17.10.1213/01.ane.0b013e31816ba437Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain 1996;65:123–67.10.1016/0304-3959(95)00214-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Fillingim R. Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different. Curr Rev Pain 2000;4:24–30.10.1007/s11916-000-0006-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. pain practice. Pain Pract 2010;10:60–71.10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00327.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth (the John J. Bonica lecture). Obstet Gynecol Surv 1985;40:297–8.10.1097/00006254-198505000-00008Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Albers LL. Reducing genital tract trauma at birth: launching a clinical trial in midwifery. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003;48:105–10.10.1016/S1526-9523(02)00415-4Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Miller JM, Low LK, Zielinski R, Smith AR, Delancey JOL, Brandon C. Evaluating maternal recovery from labor and delivery: bone and levator ani injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:188.e1–11.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] The Swedish medical birth register [Internet]. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare; 1973-. The Swedish medical birth register: pregnancies, deliveries and newborn infants; [updated 2020 Feb 27; cited 2020 Feb 28]. Available at: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikamnen/graviditeter-forlossningar-och-nyfodda/Accessed: Aug 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Schug SA, Pogatzki-Zahn E. Chronic pain after surgery or injury. Pain Clin Updates 2011;14:1–5.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Feizerfan A, Sheh G. Transition from acute to chronic pain. BJA Educ 2015;15:98–102.10.1093/bjaceaccp/mku044Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367:1618–25.10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-XSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Goldberg DS, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health 2011;11:770–0.10.1186/1471-2458-11-770Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Fine PG. Long-term consequences of chronic pain: mounting evidence for pain as a neurological disease and parallels with other chronic disease states. Pain Med 2011;12:996–1004.10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01187.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Lavand’homme P. Persistent pain after caesarean delivery and vaginal birth. In: Clark V, Van de Velde M, Fernando R, editors. Oxford Textbook of Obstetric Anaesthesia. 1. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016:380–9.10.1093/med/9780198713333.003.0025Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:505–10.10.1080/j.1600-0412.2001.080006505.xSuche in Google Scholar

[17] Gutke A, Lundberg M, Östgaard H, Öberg C. Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms. Eur Spine J 2011;20:440–810.1007/s00586-010-1487-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Stomp-van den Berg SGM, Hendriksen IJM, Bruinvels DJ, Twisk JWR, van Mechelen WNM, van Poppel M. Predictors for postpartum pelvic girdle pain in working women: The Mom@Work cohort study. Pain 2012;153:2370–9.10.1016/j.pain.2012.08.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Norén L, Östgaard S, Johansson G, Östgaard H. Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2002;11:267–71.10.1007/s00586-001-0357-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Eisenach JC, Pan PM, Smiley RT, Lavand’homme P, Landau R, Houle T. Resolution of pain after childbirth. Anesthesiology 2013;118:143–51.10.1097/ALN.0b013e318278ccfdSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Kainu J, Sarvela J, Tiippana R, Halmesmäki E, Korttila KT. Persistent pain after caesarean section and vaginal birth: a cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010;19:4–9.10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.03.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Nikolajsen L, Sørensen HC, Jensen TS, Kehlet H. Chronic pain following Caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:111–6.10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00271.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Niklasson B, Georgsson Öhman S, Segerdahl M, Blanck A. Risk factors for persistent pain and its influence on maternal wellbeing after cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:622–8.10.1111/aogs.12613Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y, Meissner W, Wöckel A, Roewer N, Kranke P. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016;33:853–65.10.1097/EJA.0000000000000535Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] McDonald EA, Gartland DJ, Small R, Brown S. Dyspareunia and childbirth: a prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2015;70:319–20.10.1097/01.ogx.0000466340.51108.12Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT. Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:881–90.10.1067/mob.2001.113855Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Rosen NO, Pukall C. Comparing the prevalence, risk factors, and repercussions of postpartum genito-pelvic pain and dyspareunia. Sex Med Rev 2016;4:126–35.10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.12.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor C, Thakar R, Manyonda I. Women’s sexuality after childbirth: a pilot study. Arch Sex Behav 1999;28:179–9110.1023/A:1018771906780Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rowbotham MC, Backonja MM, Baron R, Bellamy N, Bhagwagar Z, Costello A, Cowan P, Fang WC, Hertz S, Jay GW, et al. Considerations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2012;153:1148–58.10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Kosek E, Lavandʼhomme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain 2015;156:1003–7.10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;41:1073–93.10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113:9–19.10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Woo A, Lechner B, Fu T, Wong CS, Chiu N, Lam H, Pulenzas N, Soliman H, DeAngelis C, Chow E. Cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain among cancer and non-cancer patients: a literature review. Ann Palliat Med 2015;4:176–83.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Östgaard HC, Roos-Hansson E, Zetherström G. Regression of back and posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. Spine 1996;21:2777–80.10.1097/00007632-199612010-00013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, Guselle P, Helewa M, Hodnett ED, Hutton E, Kung R, Mckay D, Ross S, Saigal S, Willan A. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:917–27.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Roset E, Boulvain M, Irion O. Nonclosure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;108:40–4.10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00366-4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Lavand’homme P. Chronic pain after childbirth. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013;26:273–710.1097/ACO.0b013e328360c57bSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Gaudet C, Wen S, Walker W. Chronic perinatal pain as a risk factor for postpartum depression symptoms in Canadian women. Can J Public Health 2013;104:e375–87.10.17269/cjph.104.4029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Åhlund S, Rådestad I, Zwedberg S, Lindgren H. Perineal pain the first year after childbirth and uptake of post-partum check-up- a Swedish cohort study. Midwifery 2019;78:85–90.10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] van Hecke O, Torrance N, Smith BH. Chronic pain epidemiology – where do lifestyle factors fit in? Br J Pain 2013;7:209–17.10.1177/2049463713493264Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2019-11-28
Revised: 2020-04-15
Accepted: 2020-04-17
Published Online: 2020-05-08
Published in Print: 2020-07-28

©2020 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. All rights reserved.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial Comment
  3. Been there, done that – what now? New avenues for dealing with chronic pain
  4. Systematic Review
  5. Conditioned pain modulation in elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Meta-analysis comparing placebo responses in clinical trials of painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy and diabetic polyneuropathy
  7. Can insights from placebo and nocebo mechanisms studies improve the randomized controlled trial?
  8. Clinical Pain Research
  9. Responses after spinal interventions in a clinical pain practice – a pragmatic observational study
  10. Responsiveness and longitudinal validity of the Persian version of COMI to physiotherapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain
  11. The complex experience of psoriasis related skin pain: a qualitative study
  12. Self-reported traumatic etiology of pain and psychological function in tertiary care pain clinic patients: a collaborative health outcomes information registry (CHOIR) study
  13. Patients selected to participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes in primary care−a multivariate cross-sectional study focusing on gender and sick leave
  14. “No one wants you” – a qualitative study on the experiences of receiving rejection from tertiary care pain centres
  15. Association between health care utilization and musculoskeletal pain. A 21-year follow-up of a population cohort
  16. Psychological resilience associates with pain experience in women treated for breast cancer
  17. Opioid tapering after surgery: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences
  18. Raising awareness about chronic pain and dyspareunia among women – a Swedish survey 8 months after childbirth
  19. Observational studies
  20. Combined analysis of 3 cross-sectional surveys of pain in 14 countries in Europe, the Americas, Australia, and Asia: impact on physical and emotional aspects and quality of life
  21. Are labor pain and birth experience associated with persistent pain and postpartum depression? A prospective cohort study
  22. Original Experimental
  23. The influence of restless legs symptoms on musculoskeletal pain in depression
  24. Pain and social cognition: does pain lead to more stereotyped judgments based on ethnicity and age?
  25. Effects of oral alcohol administration on heat pain threshold and ratings of supra-threshold stimuli
  26. Pain catastrophizing is associated with pain thresholds for heat, cold and pressure in women with chronic pelvic pain
Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sjpain-2019-0163/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen