Startseite Abstractness and Motivation in Phonological Theory
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Abstractness and Motivation in Phonological Theory

  • Eric Baković
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. März 2015
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this piece I adopt the standard textbook definition of abstractness in generative phonological theory, “the degree to which a UR [= underlying representation] of a morpheme may deviate from its associated PRs [= phonetic representations]” (Kenstowicz & Kisseberth 1979, p.179). I also adopt the perspective that a phonological analysis, independently of its degree of abstractness, is (only) as adequate as the motivation and evidence that can be produced in favor of it and against substantive alternatives. This is the focus of my remarks in this piece, featuring a thorough critique of the motivation and evidence for the abstract geminate rhotic representation of the intervocalic trill in Spanish (Harris 1969, 1983, 2001, 2002).

Published Online: 2015-3-20
Published in Print: 2009-3-1

© 2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/shll-2009-1041/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen