Space, complementarity, and “diagrammatic reasoning”
-
Michael Otte
Abstract
In the development of pure mathematics during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, two very different movements had prevailed. The so-called rigor movement of arithmetization, which turned into set theoretical foundationalism, on the one hand, and the axiomatic movement, which originated in Poncelet's or Peirce's emphasis on the continuity principle, on the other hand. Axiomatical mathematics or mathematics as diagrammatic reasoning represents a genetic perspective aiming at generalization, whereas mathematics as arithmetic or set theory is mainly concerned with foundation and separation. We may thus conclude when Peirce defines mathematics in terms of diagrammatic reasoning, that this implies some very profound distinctions in the epistemology of mathematics.
© 2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Introduction: Diagrammatical reasoning and Peircean logic representations
- Images, diagrams, and narratives: Charles S. Peirce's epistemological theory of mental diagrams
- The fine structure of Peircean ligatures and lines of identity
- When is a bunch of marks on paper a diagram? Diagrams as homomorphic representations
- Ligatures in Peirce's existential graphs
- Iconic thought and diagrammatical scripture: Peirce and the Leibnizian tradition
- Linear notation for existential graphs
- Peircean Algebraic Logic and Peirce's Reduction Thesis
- Remarks on the iconicity and interpretation of existential graphs
- Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning
- External diagrammatization and iconic brain co-evolution
- Computers as medium for mathematical writing
- Peircean diagrams of time
- Space, complementarity, and “diagrammatic reasoning”
- Diagrams, iconicity, and abductive discovery
- Moving pictures of thought II: Graphs, games, and pragmaticism's proof
- Peirce's alpha graphs and propositional languages
- Peirce's tutorial on existential graphs
- On operational and optimal iconicity in Peirce's diagrammatology
- Existential graphs and proofs of pragmaticism
Articles in the same Issue
- Introduction: Diagrammatical reasoning and Peircean logic representations
- Images, diagrams, and narratives: Charles S. Peirce's epistemological theory of mental diagrams
- The fine structure of Peircean ligatures and lines of identity
- When is a bunch of marks on paper a diagram? Diagrams as homomorphic representations
- Ligatures in Peirce's existential graphs
- Iconic thought and diagrammatical scripture: Peirce and the Leibnizian tradition
- Linear notation for existential graphs
- Peircean Algebraic Logic and Peirce's Reduction Thesis
- Remarks on the iconicity and interpretation of existential graphs
- Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning
- External diagrammatization and iconic brain co-evolution
- Computers as medium for mathematical writing
- Peircean diagrams of time
- Space, complementarity, and “diagrammatic reasoning”
- Diagrams, iconicity, and abductive discovery
- Moving pictures of thought II: Graphs, games, and pragmaticism's proof
- Peirce's alpha graphs and propositional languages
- Peirce's tutorial on existential graphs
- On operational and optimal iconicity in Peirce's diagrammatology
- Existential graphs and proofs of pragmaticism
