Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
The revised fundamental sign
-
Torkild Thellefsen
Published/Copyright:
October 27, 2008
Abstract
According to Charles S. Peirce we have to take responsibility for our scientific concepts. Having introduced the scientific world to a concept we have to revise it whenever further investigation alters the meaning of the concept. This article revises the definition of the fundamental sign, a concept developed by me and thus my responsibility. I define it in relation to Peirce’s formal conditions for communication and community. These formal conditions make it possible to understand the fundamental sign as part of a discourse community, carrying the qualities of the community — the sense of community.
:
Published Online: 2008-10-27
Published in Print: 2005-06-20
Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Semiotic perspective of psychiatric diagnosis
- On the relation between sound and meaning in Hicks’ Snow Falling on Cedars
- The revised fundamental sign
- Maigre comme un hareng : ‘Miss Harriet’ de Guy de Maupassant
- Prosper Mérimée : Surface sémantique d’un récit
- A fuzzy approach to discourse topics
- Metonymy as a tool of cognition and representation: A natural language analysis
- Sémiotique, philosophie et véridiction : Essai contre l’amalgame de la signification et de la désignation
- Science in carnival: DNA and the iconic body
- A semiotics of human actions for wearable augmented reality interfaces
- The symbolosphere, conceptualization, language, and neo-dualism
- An assessment and application of structuralism and linguistics: A structuralist approach to ‘The Woman Who Fell From the Sky,’ a Native American creation myth
- Iconicity and indexicality: The body in Chinese art
- The Human Genome Project: An increasingly elusive ‘human nature’
- Body and space: Michael Chekhov’s notion of atmosphere as the means of creating space in theatre
- Eyes, mirror, light: History’s other lenses
Articles in the same Issue
- Semiotic perspective of psychiatric diagnosis
- On the relation between sound and meaning in Hicks’ Snow Falling on Cedars
- The revised fundamental sign
- Maigre comme un hareng : ‘Miss Harriet’ de Guy de Maupassant
- Prosper Mérimée : Surface sémantique d’un récit
- A fuzzy approach to discourse topics
- Metonymy as a tool of cognition and representation: A natural language analysis
- Sémiotique, philosophie et véridiction : Essai contre l’amalgame de la signification et de la désignation
- Science in carnival: DNA and the iconic body
- A semiotics of human actions for wearable augmented reality interfaces
- The symbolosphere, conceptualization, language, and neo-dualism
- An assessment and application of structuralism and linguistics: A structuralist approach to ‘The Woman Who Fell From the Sky,’ a Native American creation myth
- Iconicity and indexicality: The body in Chinese art
- The Human Genome Project: An increasingly elusive ‘human nature’
- Body and space: Michael Chekhov’s notion of atmosphere as the means of creating space in theatre
- Eyes, mirror, light: History’s other lenses
