Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
What could self-reflexiveness be? or Goedel’s Theorem goes to Hollywood and discovers that it’s all done with mirrors
-
ROBERT A. SCHULTZ
Published/Copyright:
September 29, 2009
Published Online: 2009-09-29
Published in Print: 1980
Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Sonstiges
- Titelei
- Reflexivity: Definitions and discriminations
- The myth of Narcissus
- Reflections on looking into mirrors
- Symbolic types, mediation and the transformation of ritual context: Sinhalese demons and Tewa clowns
- The reinvention of reflexivity in Jewish prayer: The self and community in modernity
- The Journal as activity and genre: Or listening to the Silent Laughter of Mozart
- Ephemeral art: A case for the functions of aesthetic Stimuli
- What could self-reflexiveness be? or Goedel’s Theorem goes to Hollywood and discovers that it’s all done with mirrors
- Exposing yourself: Reflexivity, anthropology, and film
- Concluding comments on ritual and reflexivity
Articles in the same Issue
- Sonstiges
- Titelei
- Reflexivity: Definitions and discriminations
- The myth of Narcissus
- Reflections on looking into mirrors
- Symbolic types, mediation and the transformation of ritual context: Sinhalese demons and Tewa clowns
- The reinvention of reflexivity in Jewish prayer: The self and community in modernity
- The Journal as activity and genre: Or listening to the Silent Laughter of Mozart
- Ephemeral art: A case for the functions of aesthetic Stimuli
- What could self-reflexiveness be? or Goedel’s Theorem goes to Hollywood and discovers that it’s all done with mirrors
- Exposing yourself: Reflexivity, anthropology, and film
- Concluding comments on ritual and reflexivity
