Abstract
Autocommunication, communication with oneself, may become distinct from communication with an “other” both in form and function. Autocommunication has a special role in the development of thinking in small children, as differentiation of speech for oneself, known as “private speech,” from communication for social purposes entails the child’s organization of her or his own cognition and behavior with the aid of symbols. Recent studies have suggested that speech distinctly for the child him or herself is particularly observable during what is called “crib speech” and thus it appears to support already early language acquisition. The purpose and functions of crib speech in child development have been topics of interest until recently, but they are still debated. In autocommunication, instead of transfer of signs from one mind to another as when in communication with an “other,” there is transfer of signs from one state of mind to another, as in the case of recalling something with the help of signs. Next to this mnemonic type autocommunication, Juri Lotman was interested in the type in which textual devices within a text guide the communicative interpretation in relation to the text itself, particularly characteristic to poetry. The paper provides a semiotic analysis of crib speech in terms of Lotman’s concept of autocommunication explaining its particular appearance both in form and content, as well as what initiates and inspires it for the small child and why does it bring such joy. From the point of view of semiotics, crib speech presents as an exceptionally rich phenomenon. In addition to being small children’s language practice, crib speech appears as language play, if not poetry, serving as a modelling system for enacting and representing the world as it appears for the small child.
Funding source: Semiotic fitting as a mechanism of biocultural diversity: instability and sustainability in novel environments
Award Identifier / Grant number: PRG314
Acknowledgments
Author thanks Kalevi Kull, Sara Lenninger and Aaro Toomela for the constructive criticism of the earlier drafts of this paper.
-
Research funding: This work was supported by Project “Semiotic fitting as a mechanism of biocultural diversity: instability and sustainability in novel environments (PRG314).”
References
Austin, John L. 1962 [1955]. How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Britton, James. 1970. Language and learning. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 2004. The narrative creation of self. In Lynne E. Angus & John McLeod (eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory, and research, 3–14. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1989. The open work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2005 [1979]. Lector in fabula. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Search in Google Scholar
Fernyhough, Charles. 2009. Dialogic thinking. In Adam Winsler, Charles Fernyhough & Ignacio Montero (eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation, 42–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581533.004Search in Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Julie. 1988. From discourse to semantics: The development of verb morphology and forms of self-reference in the speech of a two-year-old. Journal of Child Language 15. 337–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030500090001240x.Search in Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1962]. Anthony’s contribution to linguistic theory. In Selected writings II: Word and language, 285–288. The Hague: Mouton. https://www.degruyter.com/serial/jakobsw-b/html.10.1515/9783110873269.285Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1967]. Linguistics in relation to other sciences. In Selected writings II: Word and language, 655–696. The Hague: Mouton. https://www.degruyter.com/serial/jakobsw-b/html.10.1515/9783110873269.655Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1981 [1933–1934]. What is poetry? In Stephen, Rudy (ed.), Selected writings III: Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry, 740–750. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110802122.740Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1981 [1960]. Linguistics and poetics. In Stephen, Rudy (ed.), Selected writings III: Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry, 18–51. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110802122.18Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1985 [1969]. The fundamental and specific characteristics of human language. In Stephen, Rudy & Linda, R. Waugh (eds.), Selected writings VII: Contributions to comparative mythology. Studies in linguistics and philology, 1972–1982, 93–97. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110855463.93Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1985 [1972]. Verbal communication. In Stephen, Rudy & Linda, R. Waugh (eds.), Selected writings VII: Contributions to comparative mythology. Studies in linguistics and philology, 1972–1982, 81–92. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110855463.81Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1985 [1974]. Communication and society. In Stephen, Rudy & Linda, R. Waugh (eds.), Selected writings VII: Contributions to comparative mythology. Studies in linguistics and philology, 1972–1982, 98–100. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1985 [1976]. Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. In Stephen, Rudy & Linda, R. Waugh (eds.), Selected writings VII: Contributions to comparative mythology. Studies in linguistics and philology, 1972–1982, 113–121. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110855463.113Search in Google Scholar
Kuczaj, Stanley. 1983. Crib speech and language play. New York: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4613-9502-7Search in Google Scholar
Linask, Lauri. 2018. Differentiation of language functions during language acquisition based on Roman Jakobson’s communication model. Sign Systems Studies 46(4). 517–537. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2018.46.4.06.Search in Google Scholar
Linask, Lauri. 2019. Vygotsky’s natural history of signs. Sign Systems Studies 47(1/2). 257–304. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2019.47.1-2.10.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 1990. Autocommunication: “I” and “other” as addressees. In Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture, Ann Shukman (trans.), 20–35. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri. 2009. Culture and explosion, Wilma Clark (trans.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218473Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri. 2011 [1967]. The place of art among other modelling systems. Sign Systems Studies 39(2/4). 249–270. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2011.39.2-4.10.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M., Vjacheslav V. Ivanov, Aleksandr M. Pjatigorski, Vladimir N. Toporov & Boris A. Uspenskij. 2013 [1973]. Theses on the semiotic study of cultures (as applied to Slavic texts). In Silvi Salupere, Peeter Torop & Kalevi Kull (eds.), Beginnings of the semiotics of culture, 53–77. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mead, Danielle L. & Adam Winsler. 2019. Change over time in the type and functions of crib speech around the fourth birthday. Language & Communication 67. 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.12.001.Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, Katherine. 2006a [1989]. Monologue as representation of real-life experience. In Katherine Nelson (ed.), Narratives from the crib, 27–72. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, Katherine (ed.). 2006b [1989]. Narratives from the crib. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, Katherine. 2015. Making sense with private speech. Cognitive Development 36. 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.004.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1999 [1951]. Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 2005 [1923]. The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203992739Search in Google Scholar
Pickert, Sarah M. 1981. Imaginative dialogues in children’s private speech. First Language 2. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378100200401.Search in Google Scholar
Schaerlaekens, Annemarie. 1997. Crib speech in autistic and psychotic children: Case studies of form, content and function. First Language 17(51). 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379701705114.Search in Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. & Warren Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar
Valsiner, Jaan. 2002. Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory and Psychology 12(2). 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302012002633.Search in Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev & Alexander Luria. 1994. Tool and symbol in child development. In René Van der Veer & Jaan Valsiner (eds.), The Vygotsky reader, Theresa Prout (trans.), 99–174. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev. 1986 [1934]. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev. 1997. The history of the development of higher mental functions. In Robert W. Rieber (ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 4, Marie J. Hall (trans.). New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar
Winsler, Adam. 2009. Still talking to ourselves after all these years: A review of current research on private speech. In Adam Winsler, Charles Fernyhough & Ignacio Montero (eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation, 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581533.003Search in Google Scholar
Winsler, Adam, Michael Feder, Erin L. Way & Louis Manfra. 2006. Maternal beliefs concerning young children’s private speech. Infant and Child Development 15. 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.467.Search in Google Scholar
Weir, Ruth Hirsch. 1962. Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- A pragmatic view of the poetic function of language
- “Little music” or “rough music”?: Ishion Hutchinson, modernist poet
- How binding and bonding communicate interpersonal meanings in a children’s museum to address Jordan’s energy and water challenges
- Autocommunication in crib speech and private speech
- From action to performative gesture: the Slapping movement used by children at the age of four to six
- An important chapter in the history of semiotics: inference from signs in Philodemus’ De signis
- Meaning and the evolution of signification and objectivity
- Shielding the learned body: a semiotic analysis of school badges in New South Wales, Australia
- The primordiality of representation
- The existential signs through the works of Alev Ebuzziya Siesbye
- Paratexts and the reframing of a classic: Korean translations of the Japanese Women’s Analects
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- A pragmatic view of the poetic function of language
- “Little music” or “rough music”?: Ishion Hutchinson, modernist poet
- How binding and bonding communicate interpersonal meanings in a children’s museum to address Jordan’s energy and water challenges
- Autocommunication in crib speech and private speech
- From action to performative gesture: the Slapping movement used by children at the age of four to six
- An important chapter in the history of semiotics: inference from signs in Philodemus’ De signis
- Meaning and the evolution of signification and objectivity
- Shielding the learned body: a semiotic analysis of school badges in New South Wales, Australia
- The primordiality of representation
- The existential signs through the works of Alev Ebuzziya Siesbye
- Paratexts and the reframing of a classic: Korean translations of the Japanese Women’s Analects