Spatial diagrams and geometrical reasoning in the theater

References

Ackerley, Chris. 2009. “Ever know what happened?”: Shades and echoes in Samuel Beckett’s television plays. Journal of Beckett Studies 18(1–2). 136–164. https://doi.org/10.3366/e0309520709000326.Search in Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel. 1984. The collected shorter plays. New York: Grove Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berensmeyer, Ingo. 2004. “Twofold vibration”: Samuel Beckett’s laws of form. Poetics Today 25(3). 465–495. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-3-465.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, Phyllis. 1988. The quad pieces: A screen for the unseeable. In Robin J. Davis & Lance St J. Butler (eds.), Make sense who may: Essays on Samuel Beckett’s later works, 145–149. Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe.Search in Google Scholar

Chandrasekaran, Balakrishnan, Janice Glasgow & N. Hari Narayanan (eds.). 1995. Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Connor, Steven. 1988. Samuel Beckett: Repetition, theory, and text. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Cousineau, Thomas. 1990. Waiting for Godot: Form in movement. Boston, MA: Twayne.Search in Google Scholar

Degani-Raz, Irit. 2005. Theatrical fictional worlds, counterfactuals, and scientific thought experiments. Semiotica 157(1/4). 353–375.10.1515/semi.2005.2005.157.1-4.353Search in Google Scholar

Degani-Raz, Irit. 2008. Diagrams, formalism, and structural homology in Beckett’s Come and Go. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 22(2). 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2008.0007.Search in Google Scholar

Degani-Raz, Irit. 2014. “Language as calculus” in Beckett’s writing: A new perspective on Beckett’s conception of language. Semiotica 200(1/4). 85–101.10.1515/sem-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Elam, Kier. 1980. The semiotics of theatre and drama. London: Methuen.10.4324/9780203993309Search in Google Scholar

Esslin, Martin. 1987. Towards the zero of language. In Acheson James & Kateryna Arthur (eds.), Beckett’s later fiction and drama, 35–49. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-18713-3_3Search in Google Scholar

Garner, Stanton B. 1994. Bodied spaces: Phenomenology and performance in contemporary drama. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2000. Thought experiment: On the powers and limits of imaginary cases. New York and London: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2004. Thought experiments rethought – and reperceived. Philosophy of Science 71(5). 1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1086/425239.Search in Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. 1997. Lingua universalis vs. calculus ratiocinator: An ultimate presupposition of twentieth-century philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8601-6Search in Google Scholar

Hookway, Christopher. 1985. Peirce. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Klaver, Elizabeth. 1990. Postmodernism and metatextual space in the plays of Beckett, Ionesco, Albee and Mamet. PhD diss. Riverside: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Klaver, Elizabeth & Samuel Beckett. 1991. Samuel Beckett’s Ohio Impromptu, Quad, and what Where: How it is in the matrix of text and television. Contemporary Literature 32(3). 366–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1208562.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 1999. Postdramatisches theater. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag der Autoren.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Okamuro, Minako. 1997. Quad and the Jungian mandala. In Marius Buning, Matthijs Engelberts & Sjef Houppermans (eds.), Samuel Beckett: Crossroads and borderlines, 125–134. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/18757405-90000055Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. In Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.), The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1976. In Carolyn Eisele (ed.), The new elements of mathematics, 4 vols. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter; Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press [Reference to Peirce’s New Elements will be designated NEM followed by volume and page number].Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Herta. 1988. Samuel Beckett’s play, Quad: An abstract synthesis of the theatre. Canadian-American Slavic Studies 22(1–4). 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1163/221023988x00230.Search in Google Scholar

Shin, Sun-Joo, Oliver Lemon & John Mumma. 2018. Diagrams. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/diagrams (accessed 1 March 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1987. Semantics for belief. Philosophical Topics 15(1). 177–190; https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics198715116.Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36(3). 357–384.Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2011. Peirce’s notion of diagram experiment: Corrollarial and theorematical experiments with diagrams. In Richard Heinrich, Elisabeth Nemeth, Wolfram Pichler & David Wagner (eds.), Image and imaging in philosophy, science, and the arts: Proceedings of the 33rd International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchberg 2010, 305–340. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.10.1515/9783110330496.305Search in Google Scholar