Lost and not found: The Course in General Linguistics between “Saussurism” and “Saussurology”

Boris Gasparov

doi:10.1515/sem-2017-0090

Enjoy 40% off

academic books on De Gruyter Brill *

Article

Lost and not found: The Course in General Linguistics between “Saussurism” and “Saussurology”

Boris Gasparov

Published/Copyright: June 1, 2017

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Semiotica Volume 2017 Issue 217

Abstract

Saussure’s quest for constitutive features of language resulted in his formulation of two fundamental principles: first, the bipolarity of the sign, according to which neither form nor meaning of a sign exists as of itself, outside of their mutual relation; and second, the arbitrariness of that relation, i.e., the fact that their link is based solely on convention. The purely relational nature of language, the fact that its entities have no positive identity of their own result in the unceasing development of language whose direction and results can be neither programmed nor predicted. In the first half of the twentieth century, Saussure’s idea of language as a pure “structure” was interpreted in a static way, as a matrix of relations whose elements occupy secure positions in the overall relational network. When critique of the structural approach has been raised in the 1960–1980s, Saussure’s champions tried to distance Saussure’s “genuine” views, ostensibly expressed in his private papers, from his posthumously published Course, which was declared unreliable or even falsified. The present paper argues that the problem with interpreting Saussure arises primarily from the way his works were read by different generations and in different intellectual contexts. Saussure’s work needs to be examined in the context of its own time, as an integral part of the philosophical revolution of the turn of the twentieth century.

Keywords: structuralist reading of Saussure’s Course; the Course’s authenticity; modernist philosophical revolution; la langue as epistemological construct; arbitrariness; synchrony and diachrony as philosophical concepts

References

Bouquet, Simon. 1997. Introduction à la lecture de Saussure. Paris: Payot & Rivages.Search in Google Scholar

Bouquet, Simon & Rudolf Engler. 2002. Préface des éditeurs. In Simon Bouquet & Rudolf Engler (eds.), Écrits de linguistique générale, 7–14. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. 1986. Ferdinand de Saussure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1967. De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit.Search in Google Scholar

Firth, John Rupert. 1964. Personality and language in society. In J. R. Firth, Papers in linguistics, 1934–1951, 177–189. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gadet, Françoise. 1987. Saussure: Une science de la langue. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Gandon, Francis. 2003. Chaos des corps, chora des mots: Onze vers de Lucrèce sur l’illusion d’amoureuse. In Simon Bouquet (ed.), L’herne Saussure, 430–441. Paris: Herne.Search in Google Scholar

Gautier, Léopold. 2005. Entretiens avec M. de Saussure, 6 Mai 1911. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 58. 69–70.Search in Google Scholar

Godel, Robert. 1957. Les sources manuscrits du Cours de linguistique générale de Ferdinand de Saussure. Genève: E. Droz.Search in Google Scholar

Hagège, Claude, 2003. La vulgate et la lettre, ou Saussure par deux fois restitué: De l’arbitraire du signe et de la syntaxe dans le Cours de linguistique générale. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 56. 121–134.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1978. Six lectures on sound and meaning. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maniglier, Patrice. 2006. La vie énigmatique des signes: Saussure et la naissance du structuralisme. Paris: Léo Scheer.Search in Google Scholar

Normand, Claudine. 2000. Saussure. Paris: Les belles lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Pétroff, André-Jean. 1999. La langue, l’ordre et le désordre: Les analyses de Ferdinand de Saussure. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 52. 253–281.Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean. 1968. Le strucuralisme. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1964. Lettres de Ferdinand de Saussure à Antoine Meillet publiées par Emile Benveniste. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 21. 93–134.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1967. Cours de linguistique générale, Tullio de Mauro (ed.). Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1968–1974. Cours de linguistique générale, Rudolf Engler (ed.), 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1993. Troisiéme cours de linguistique générale (1910–1011) d’après les cahiers d’Émile Constantine, Eisuke Komatsu (ed.). Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1996. Premier cours de linguistique générale (1907) d’après les cahiers d’Albert Riedlinger, Eisuke Komatsu (ed.). Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1997. Deuxième cours de linguistique générale (1908–1909) d’après les cahiers d’Albert Riedlinger et Charles Parois, Eisuke Komatsu (ed.). Oxford: Pergamon.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2002. Écrits de linguistique générale, Simon Bouquet & Rudolf Engler (eds.). Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2003. L’herne Saussure, Simon Bouquet (ed.). Paris: L’Herne.Search in Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean. 1971. Les mots sous les mots: Les anagrammes de Ferdinand de Saussure. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Voloshinov, Valentin. 1973 [1928]. Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-1

Published in Print: 2017-8-28

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0090

Keywords for this article

structuralist reading of Saussure’s Course; the Course’s authenticity; modernist philosophical revolution; la langue as epistemological construct; arbitrariness; synchrony and diachrony as philosophical concepts