Home Is the arbitrary symmetrical?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Is the arbitrary symmetrical?

  • Sémir Badir EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 26, 2017

Abstract

Arbitrariness is commonly seen as a major concept in Saussure’s thought, and it even receives the status of a “principle” in his theory. It is not only the characteristic feature of the relation between the signifier and the signified (the semiological relation is arbitrary), but moreover it is constitutive of this very relation (the relation is semiological because it is arbitrary; there is a so-called “semiological relation” established between a signifier and a signified because of the principle of arbitrariness). And when linguists and other Saussurean interpreters comment on the concept of arbitrariness, they usually imply a binary relation: the semiological relation is arbitrary due to the fact that the signifier is arbitrarily chosen vis-à-vis the signified, and vice versa. I will be questioning the latter assertion in this paper. In my opinion, the symmetry of the semiological relation has not been properly demonstrated. The signifier can be seen as arbitrary with regard to the signified, but no reason has been provided to recognize the converse. Instead a number of arguments can be put forth to see arbitrariness as a concept that implies a non-symmetrical relation.

References

Amacker, René. 1975. Linguistique saussurienne. Genève: Librairie Droz.Search in Google Scholar

Arnaud, Antoine & Pierre Nicole. 1992 [1662]. La logique ou l’art de penser. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Béguelin, Marie-José. 2003. La méthode comparative et l’enseignement du Mémoire. In Simon Bouquet (ed.), Saussure, 150–164. Paris: L’Herne.Search in Google Scholar

Beividas, Waldir. 2015. A teoria semiótica como epistemologia imanente: Umaterceira via do conhecimento. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1976 [1966]. Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Bouquet, Simon. 1997a. Introduction à la lecture de Saussure. Paris, Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Bouquet, Simon. 1997b. Benveniste et la représentation du sens: De l’arbitraire du signe à l’objet extra-linguistique. Linx 9. 107–122. http://linx.revues.org/1008 acessed 27 April 2017).10.4000/linx.1008Search in Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. 2003. L’essentiel de l’arbitraire. In Simon Bouquet (ed.), Saussure, 52–61. Paris: L’Herne.Search in Google Scholar

Curzio, Chiesa. 2008. Saussure, Aristote et l’onymique. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 61. 5–21.Search in Google Scholar

De Palo, Marina. 2003. L’asymétrie du signe chez Saussure. In Simon Bouquet (ed.), Saussure, 246–259. Paris: L’Herne.Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, Johannes. 2000. Saussure entre linguistique et sémiologie. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. 1973. Essais linguistiques II. Copenhagen: Nordisk Sprog-og Kulturforlag.Search in Google Scholar

Rastier, François. 2003. Le silence de Saussure ou l’ontologie refusée. In Simon Bouquet (ed.), Saussure, 23–51. Paris: L’Herne.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1964. Lettres de Ferdinand de Saussure à Antoine Meillet publiées par Émile Benveniste. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 21. 89–130.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1967. Cours de linguistique générale, Rudolf Engler (ed.). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1974. Cours de linguistique générale, tome 2: Notes de F. de Saussure sur la linguistique générale, Rudolf Engler (ed.). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2011. Science du langage, René Amacker (ed.). Genève: Libraire Droz.Search in Google Scholar

Suenaga, Akatana. 2005. Saussure, un système de paradoxes: Langue, parole, arbitraire et inconscient. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Search in Google Scholar

Toutain, Anne-Gaëlle. 2013. La rupture saussurienne: L’espace du langage. Louvain: Academia-L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Utaker, Arild. 2002. La philosophie du langage. Une archéologie saussurienne. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar

Whitney, William Dwight. 1875. The life and growth of language: An outline of linguistic science. New York: D. Appleton.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-5-26
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0041/pdf
Scroll to top button