Semiotic analysis of the observer in relativity, quantum mechanics, and a possible theory of everything

References

Christiansen, Peder Voetmann. 1985. The semiotics of quantum-non-locality. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Peder Voetmann. 2003. The semiotic flora of elementary particles . SEED3(2). 47–68.Search in Google Scholar

Dosch, Hans Günter, Volkhard F.Müller & NormanSieroka. 2005a. Quantum field theory, its concepts viewed from a semiotic perspective. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1624/1/ms_dosch_muller_sieroka.pdf (accessed 17 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Dosch, Hans Günter, Volkhard F.Müller & NormanSieroka. 2005b. Quantum field theory in a semiotic perspective. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert.1920. Relativity: The special and general theory. New York: Henry Holt.Search in Google Scholar

Goldstein, Herbert.1980. Classical mechanics, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Jammer, Max.1966. The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Januschke, Eugen.2010. Semiotische Aspekte der Quantenphysik. Münster: Monsenstein und Vannerdat.Search in Google Scholar

Krips, Henry.2013. Measurement in quantum theory. In Edward N.Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/qt-measurement/(accessed 17 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Laudisa, Federico & CarloRovelli.2013. Relational quantum mechanics. In Edward N.Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/qm-relational/ (accessed 17 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Lloyd, Seth.2006. A theory of quantum gravity based on quantum computation. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0501135 (accessed 17 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Lloyd, Seth.2007. Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, George.1963. Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics: A lecture-note volume. New York & Amsterdam: Benjamin.Search in Google Scholar

Markopoulou, Fotini.2000a. An insider’s guide to quantum causal histories . Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements88(1). 308–313.10.1016/S0920-5632(00)00791-XSearch in Google Scholar

Markopoulou, Fotini.2000b. Quantum causal histories. Classical and Quantum Gravity17(10). 2059–2072.10.1088/0264-9381/17/10/302Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, Ernest & JamesNewman.2008. Gödel’s proof. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L.1959. Language as particle, wave, and field. Texas Quarterly2(2). 37–54.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L.1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, 2nd edn. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1037/14786-000Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L.1976. Toward the development of tagmemic postulates. In RuthM. Brend & Kenneth L.Pike (eds.), Tagmemics: Volume 2: Theoretical discussion, 91–127. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. & Evelyn G.Pike. 1977. Grammatical analysis. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L.1982. Linguistic concepts: An introduction to tagmemics. Lincoln, NB & London: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael.1964. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael.1967. The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S.1982a. A framework for discourse analysis: The components of a discourse, from a tagmemic viewpoint. Semiotica38(3/4). 277–298.Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S.1982b. Hierarchy in discourse analysis: A revision of tagmemics. Semiotica40(1/2). 107–137.10.1515/semi.1982.40.1-2.107Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S.2013a. Information-theoretic confirmation of semiotic structures. Semiotica193(1/4). 67–82.10.1515/sem-2013-0004Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S.2013b. An information-based semiotic analysis of theories concerning theories. Semiotica193(1/4). 83–99.10.1515/sem-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar

Prashant. 2006. Quantum semiotics: A sign language for quantum mechanics. http://cumc.math.ca/2006/quantum_semiotics.pdf (accessed 17 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Resnick, Robert.1968. Introduction to special relativity. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Ryder, Lewis H.1996. Quantum field theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Keith R.1960. Mechanics, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Smolin, Lee.2007. The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next. New York: Mariner.Search in Google Scholar

Waterhouse, Viola G.1974. The history and development of tagmemics. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783111348919Search in Google Scholar

Weinberg, Steven.1995. The quantum theory of fields: Volume I: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wigner, Eugene P.1959. Group theory and its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra. New York & London: Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Woit, Peter.2007. Not even wrong: The failure of string theory and the search for unity in physical law. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar