Signaling equality: On humor and other semiotic resources that serve disagreement and display horizontal hierarchy

References

Argaman, Einav.2009. Arguing within an institutional hierarchy: How argumentative talk and interlocutors’ embodied practices preserve a superior-subordinate relationship. Discourse Studies11(5). 515–541.10.1177/1461445609340498Search in Google Scholar

Berk, Ronald A.2003. Professors are from Mars, students are from Snickers: How to write and deliver humor in the classroom and in professional presentations. Madison, WI: Mendota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Diana Calhoun & Sara RedingtonElledge. 2008. Dominance and peer tutoring sessions with English language learners. Learning Assistance Review13(1). 17–30.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Diana Calhoun, ArnoldHolly & HaddockRebecca. 2009. Linguistic politeness and peer tutoring. Learning Assistance Review14(1). 37–54.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth Aronson1978. Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & EliteOlshtain. 1984. Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns. Applied Linguistics5(3). 198–213.10.1093/applin/5.3.196Search in Google Scholar

Dale, Karen & GibsonBurrell.2000. What shape are we in? Organization theory and the organized body. In JohnHassard, RuthHolliday & HughWillmott (eds.), Body and organization, 15–30. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446218303.n1Search in Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul & Wallace V.Friesen.2003. Unmasking the face. Cambridge, MA: Malor.Search in Google Scholar

Even Shoshan, Abraham. 2000. Even Shushan dictionary. Israel: Am Oved, Kineret Zmora Bitan & Yediot Axaronot.Search in Google Scholar

Glinert, Lewis.1989. The grammar of modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles.2000. Practices of seeing: Visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In Theovan Leeuwen & CareyJewitt (eds.), The handbook of visual analysis, 157–182. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857020062.n8Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie HarnessGoodwin. 1990. Interstitial argument. In AllenGirmshaw (ed.), Conflict talk, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2008. The embodiment of friendship, power and marginalization in a multi-ethnic, multi-class preadolescent US girls’ peer group. Girlhood Studies1(2). 72–94.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & CharlesGoodwin. 1987. Children’s arguing. In SueFisher & AlexandraTodd (eds.), Gender and discourse: The power of talk, 55–94. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, CharlesGoodwin & MalcahYaeger-Dror. 2002. Multi-modality in girls’ game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics34(10–11). 1621–1649.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00078-4Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & AmyKyratzis. (2012). Peer language socialization. In AlessandroDuranti, ElinorOchs & Bambi B.Schieffelin (eds.), The handbook of language socialization, 365–389. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Harper, Harriet.2000. New college hierarchies? Towards an examination of organizational structures in further education in England and Wales. Educational Management & Administration28(4). 433–445.10.1177/0263211X000284006Search in Google Scholar

Hillman, Sandra M. (2001). Humor in the classroom: Facilitating the learning process. In Arlene J.Lowenstein & Martha J.Bradshaw (eds.), Fuszard’s innovative teaching strategies in nursing, 3rd ed., 54–61. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet.2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humor functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies2(2). 159–185.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet & MeredithMarra.2002. Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. Humor15(1). 85–87.10.1515/humr.2002.006Search in Google Scholar

Iannello, Kathleen. P.1992. Decisions without hierarchy. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ikeda, Keiko.2008. A conversation analytic account of the interactional structure of “arguments”. Studies in Language and Culture29(2). 289–304.Search in Google Scholar

Jaworski, Adam & IteshSachdev.1998. Beliefs about silence in the classroom. Language and Education12(4). 273–292.10.1080/09500789808666754Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail.1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In GeorgePsathas (ed.) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 79–96. New York: Irvington.Search in Google Scholar

Keeling, Richard P., RicUnderhile & Andrew F.Wall.2007. Horizontal and vertical structures: The dynamics of organization in higher education. Liberal Education90(4). 22–31.Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam.2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar

Kyratzis, Amy & TraciMarx.2001. Preschoolers’ communicative competence: Register shift in the marking of power in different contexts of friendship group talk. First Language21(63). 387–431.10.1177/014272370102106308Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C.1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In AnthonyWootton & PaulDrew (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, 161–227. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria. 2008. Real disorder in the court: An investigation of conflict talk in US television courtroom shows. Media, Culture & Society30(1). 81–107.10.1177/0163443708088613Search in Google Scholar

Magee, Joe C. & Adam D.Galinsky. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals2(1). 351–398.10.5465/19416520802211628Search in Google Scholar

Maschler, Yael.2004. Accepting while shifting: The discourse marker tov (“okay,” “fine,” lit. “good”) in Israeli Hebrew talk-in-interaction. Texas Linguistic Forum48. 216–228Search in Google Scholar

Mayer-Ahuja, Nicole & HaraldWolf. 2007. Beyond the hype: Working in the German internet industry. Critical Sociology33(1–2). 73–99.10.1163/156946307X168593Search in Google Scholar

Neill, Sean & ChrisCaswell.1993. Body language for competent teachers. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. & AliceSpitz. 2008. Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics40(10). 1661–1686.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Palacios Martínez, Ingacio M. (1996). Negative intensification in modern English. In S.Fernández Corrugedo (ed.), Some sundry wits gathered together, 183–196. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Search in Google Scholar

Portner, Paul.2007. Instructions for interpretation as separate performatives. In KerstinSchwabe & SusanneWinkler (eds.), On Information structure, meaning, and form, 407–425. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.100.22porSearch in Google Scholar

Reese-Miller, Janie. 2000. Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics32(8). 1087–1111.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Rubik.2005. Dictionary of Israeli slang. Jerusalem: Keter.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel AbrahamSchegloff & GailJefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics of the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4). 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel Abraham. 1987. Recycled turn beginnings. In GrahamButton & John R. E.Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization, 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel Abraham. 2000. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language in Society29(1). 1–63.10.1017/S0047404500001019Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel Abraham. 2001. Getting serious: Joke → serious “no”. Journal of Pragmatics33(12). 1947–1955.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00073-4Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah.1987. Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611841Search in Google Scholar